I would think so; I mean its not his fault he got cursed. Besides if you wanna sate your hunger just kill bandits. They were gonna try to kill you anyway.

Well i think its a no brainer, if you are out minding your own in the wilds and a werewolf decides to take a chunk out of your arm, you had no say and your a werewolf, and if Bethesda used their brains in bringing werewolfs to life, guards, citizens etc wont even recognize you once you return to human form... So i dont see how you cant carry on your good deeds once you are human, once a werewolf what you do shouldnt affect it to be honest. unless of course you wake up after a night ripping townsfolk and guards to pieces and your in the middle of the town naked?

nope, komodo dragons are some of the most violent animals in the world, they dont feel threatend. I suppose you could call them highly territorial, like you could call a grizzly bear mauling at you highly playfull

but yes, there is evil in elder scrolls, we have been beating tons of evil things since the start of the game series.

edit : and no, im not going to debate wether M.D. prince of destruction is just being highly playfull/teritorial, thats just silly

There's nothing inherently wrong with being a werewolf. Just like there's nothing evil about being a vampire. If you want to be good, that shouldn't stop you from having werewolf fun.

this

Eh? Bethesda put werewolves in an Elder Scrolls in 1997, then in 2003 for the Bloodmoon expansion. Twilight, the book itself, came out in 2005. Two years after Bloodmoon. That is eight years AFTER we've seen werewolves in Daggerfall, two years AFTER Bloodmoon. Bethesda most likely did not copy from Twilight.

Well, as an assumption I would say yes. You could go off playing the good guy in IV and be a vampire, so I would assume the same for having lycanthropy.

:reload: lol