I know crysis is working on it and i'm being patient but i

Post » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:08 am

First guy got turned on so bad lol, yeah we're all TRYING to be patient waiting for Crytek to address some of the issues with the game. We know it takes weeks to come up with a patch and after that dealing with all the red tape Microsoft has. I just hope most of the community will be patient and that Crytek will do the right thing.
User avatar
Claudia Cook
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:22 am

Post » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:23 am

Wow This show how people dont turn on there armor.
i bet if you did you would of killed him but since you did not have your armor on theres no point to even post this video and the dude you shot at the end is smart i wonder why u didn't kill him it look like he had armor on
Closed/

User avatar
Klaire
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:56 am

Post » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:25 am

I think the point of the video was to reiterate how bad the lag is on the game, depending on the opposing players sensitivity they really shouldn't be able to turn around and kill a player to whom they have their back to. But I do understand where you're coming from with the Armor comment, I try and Armor up before any engagement. But sometimes forget in the heat of battle lol
User avatar
NIloufar Emporio
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:18 pm

Post » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:55 am

Its mostly your aim im sorry... not the game but you
1st guy the reason you did not kill him was because you have to be at an extremely close range to kill someone with the marshall... he killed you for a reason you did not have a chance of killing him from that range, you could have just went up to him an shot him since he had his back turned but i guess you were just testing the range on the marshall it happens to everyone ;)
2nd guy had armor mode on and you didnt aim slighty ahead of him but a little behind and thats why you missed so many shots always aim ahead of the moving target for the best results
but idk it could have been the game im not the one to judge :)
User avatar
Mike Plumley
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 10:45 pm

Post » Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:08 pm

Right in dealing with these situations im a complete asshole..........

let the assholing commence.


NUMBER 1: WHY OH MOTHER MARY OF GOD would you use a shotgun at that distance to try and take down an armoured foe?

NUMBER 2: That is Maximum nanosuit a killstreak which overcharges nanosuit armour and allows you to sustain massive damage from enemies highlighted by the flashing of the enemy armour.

You may now face plant the desk.......
User avatar
patricia kris
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:05 am

1st Clip shows the Appauling Range of the marshall and lack of one shot kill damage, the second clip shows the usefulness of armor mode and what happens when you odn't use it.
User avatar
Quick Draw III
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:27 am

Post » Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:44 pm

1st Clip shows the Appauling Range of the marshall and lack of one shot kill damage, the second clip shows the usefulness of armor mode and what happens when you odn't use it.

And having the marshall with more range would be considered good? lets not have COD style shotguns here, this game is enough of a spray and pray fest already.

It needs a damage boost, what I find funny is I can go right up behind an armoured enemy with an underslung shotgun and kill them in one hit but when I use the marshall it always takes 2 hits.

Strange really, such a pointless weapon, why compromise range or close range damage when you can have both?
User avatar
Matthew Warren
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:37 pm

Post » Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:24 am

1st Clip shows the Appauling Range of the marshall and lack of one shot kill damage, the second clip shows the usefulness of armor mode and what happens when you odn't use it.

And having the marshall with more range would be considered good? lets not have COD style shotguns here, this game is enough of a spray and pray fest already.

It needs a damage boost, what I find funny is I can go right up behind an armoured enemy with an underslung shotgun and kill them in one hit but when I use the marshall it always takes 2 hits.

Strange really, such a pointless weapon, why compromise range or close range damage when you can have both?



Well The only reason you would choose a pump is for one shot kills, since you're chances of dieing while pumping increase dramtically.
User avatar
Sophh
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:58 pm

Post » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:05 am

Thanks for the criticism but i know the first guy had armor on however even with the misses and the armor i think he should have went down. I got a few head shots in there. Also if that shotgun is that short range then what's the point of it being in the game? I'm not great at this game. I do like it a lot but wtf? Idk i quit life. Lol. Thanks.

Like people have said, in the first clip you're way out of range and actually miss him once. Two patial hits at extreme range will not kill someone with the shotgun, and neither should they.

Second one, he's using Maximum Nanosuit. It'd take about 3-4 people doing the same thing you did to kill him. You're almost invincible with that on.

Personally I think you should take the video down as it's unfair to the developers. There are problems, but these aren't ones, though I appreciate your intentions are good.
User avatar
Crystal Birch
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:34 pm


Return to Crysis