I apologize for not having the direct link in my post, as I am posting from mobile.

You can find the Lens of Truth comparison by googling Head2Head Rage; or visiting LensOfTruth. Com


I just wanted to let you guys know, as well as discuss, the results.

LOT verdict: the console versions are EXACTLY the same. This is one of the closest comparisons I've seen on LoT.

I can now say with confidence that it doesn't matte which console version you get; both look identically amazing.

In my opinion PS3 looks a tiny bit better, like it would have a softener blurry shader.

Question is will pc copy look alot better or be a rushed port

PC venison? I have never eaten venison on the PC, how is it?

(sorry, couldn't resist)

This fad of calling every multiplatform game a "port" is pretty nerve wracking.

Of course it will look better on beefy PCs, gaming PCs have much better hardware than consoles.

Ehhhhhhh... Crysis is gettin an overhaul for when it gets moved to consoles tomorrow, granted is was the pinnacle of graphics for PCs for years, but it got updated to use Cry Engine 3. So now it looks more like Crysis 2, the graphics are still phenominal though.

No but im wondering will there be any effort in the game or will it be better in just fact its 1080p and has more aa or will there be better textures and effects and so on.

I've been waiting for this, but the site is down for me.

Oh well, the PC version is still the best.

FYI; the LOT site takes multiple attempt to load and it even takes a while when working; open a new tab and give it time

If it weren't for the console ports, the PC version would have looked ALOT better. Low res and blurry textures and lack of aliasing. This game looked mind blowing 1-2 years ago. But because of the consoles, they had to cut back quite alot.
It's a damn shame. Still looks amazing though.

I got the first page to load but it must be getting major traffic or taken down because now I can't access The Lens of Truth Rage comparison page 2 of 2.... Anybody else have problems?

1-2 years ago, it was being developed for consoles as well.

been follwing for some time.
one of the major points of the Tech5 is that it is supposed to make it easy for devs to develop cross platform. I am fairly certian they mention that in the 2007 QuakeCon demo.

Yes, that's true. But from where the decision was made to make it cross platform they came across problems through the development which was the result of more years into development as planned.
I didn't really mean the console port started 1-2 years ago. Just that time ran by and the game dosen't look that good today as it did those years ago cause' of drawbacks due to the limitation of the consoles.

Short story is LOT is trying to say both console versions look almost identical.

This is what id said about the game.


However, some have given a more indepth anolysis and said that the 360 version has little to no texture popup when moving forward, as if the game does a good job of predicting what will come up next. And that the PS3 version is not so good at this, likely because the install is limited to 8GB and some stuff needs to come off the optical disk which is slow in comparison to the HDD. But that otherwise, they look pretty much identical.

F that website

Indeed though. LOT is f'cked anyway you slice it, even when the website IS working.

They do stupid stuff, make stupid comparisons and have stupid policies. Like if a game comes out on PS3 with a mandatory install and on 360 without a mandatory install, they'll not install the 360 version and say the PS3 version loads faster. Even though the game would load faster if you DID install the 360 version.

That's stupid, they should compare the best possible config on both systems.