GamesRadar Talks PS3 lag...

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 8:54 am

Just thought I'd point this out...

http://www.gamesradar.com/high-horse-broken-ps3-skyrim-was-inevitable-inexcusable-and-may-be-your-fault/

What do you think? I think the cake anology is pretty funny...
User avatar
Chenae Butler
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:54 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 8:07 am

I say we get Todd at Bethesda to play the PS3 version and see how he likes it!!! Maybe just maybe he'll make the PS3 version the top priority for future patches in the weeks to come.
User avatar
Umpyre Records
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:19 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:50 pm

As I pointed out in another thread, it's funny they gave the game a 10 on PS3 then write an article a week later biatching about it (the biatching part is credible) but tt def places the review in doubt. They must not have played it for very long before they wrote it which puts their review credibility into question, along with every other review that gave the PS3 version glowing marks.
User avatar
Eric Hayes
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:57 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 8:13 am

As I pointed out in another thread, it's funny they gave the game a 10 on PS3 then write an article a week later biatching about it (the biatching part is credible) but tt def places the review in doubt. They must not have played it for very long before they wrote it which puts their review credibility into question, along with every other review that gave the PS3 version glowing marks.

i was reading some of the comments below that article, and some one said how they would of been playing the 360 version for the review, and since both games are meant to be the same the same score could be given
so maybe they had spent alot of time playing on the 360 before the review, and then when they got it for the ps3 and started a new character they seen the issue
User avatar
T. tacks Rims
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:35 am


Return to V - Skyrim