As I pointed out in another thread, it's funny they gave the game a 10 on PS3 then write an article a week later biatching about it (the biatching part is credible) but tt def places the review in doubt. They must not have played it for very long before they wrote it which puts their review credibility into question, along with every other review that gave the PS3 version glowing marks.
i was reading some of the comments below that article, and some one said how they would of been playing the 360 version for the review, and since both games are meant to be the same the same score could be given
so maybe they had spent alot of time playing on the 360 before the review, and then when they got it for the ps3 and started a new character they seen the issue