Well, it's the 1&2 supporters that are always saying that stuff "isn't true to the game". The vaults are a big part of the story line. So how would you stay true to the game with very few vaults? I don't think it's good to base the future design of the games, on the assumption that people have played all of them. Because a lot of people haven't. Probably the majority. There's probably going to be a lot of people that will play 4, that haven't played any of the old ones.

So what? Is it false to say that? Is your stance still that vaults are there... so fallout? I do not know where youre getting all this, but it certainly isn't in the games. At all. And it's not whether I like the originals more than the new ones at all, or any of that [censored].

I don't have a "stance". All I'm saying is that people often use the fact that they've played all the games, and because they are personally bored with a particular element of the game... they think that meets some sort of logical criteria that it should be removed from future games. And I'm saying that (A) Many people haven't played past games, so they never experienced it in the first place... and ( I doubt the developers are going to start eliminating stuff that has been a large part of the game, just because some people who have played past versions are tired of it. I'm just looking at it realistically. If game development used that criteria to create new versions of games each time, then COD would have been turned into football or something by now.

I personally don't like going in them because I never know what to expect plus to me they are giant mazes.