» Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:51 pm Gordon Freeman
That isn't how being the arch works. Either of the lackeys become the arch once the arch dies (as is evident), and it only makes sense that it goes by rank. Therefore, if you were second in command, you'd become the arch regardless of your size. Besides, Noelle was only 6'1". Somewhat tall for a woman, sure, but only slightly above average for a man. Therefore, your size argument falls apart.
Second, yes, I am ignoring the fact that the wolf hissed, and that it was probably directed at the other wolf. Frankly, though, that point is microscopic in comparison. It was a single out-of-character moment that we NEVER saw before that day, and have NEVER seen since from the wolf. Am I supposed to assume that that moment is a regular part of that wolf's character if it's never done similar otherwise?
If ANYONE can fit the bill better than you, then why don't you assemble some sort of case for one of these supposedly much better-suited people, rather than making up traits about yourself that were never included in your initial self-description to hopefully get yourself off the hook? So far, you say that you listen to directions well. You never stated that initially, though you claim that it's "implied." Guess what? Your competitiveness when you're having fun IMPLIES that you can become aggressive in any given situation. Don't you just love implications?
That isn't how being the arch works. Either of the lackeys become the arch once the arch dies (as is evident), and it only makes sense that it goes by rank. Therefore, if you were second in command, you'd become the arch regardless of your size. Besides, Noelle was only 6'1". Somewhat tall for a woman, sure, but only slightly above average for a man. Therefore, your size argument falls apart.
Second, yes, I am ignoring the fact that the wolf hissed, and that it was probably directed at the other wolf. Frankly, though, that point is microscopic in comparison. It was a single out-of-character moment that we NEVER saw before that day, and have NEVER seen since from the wolf. Am I supposed to assume that that moment is a regular part of that wolf's character if it's never done similar otherwise?
If ANYONE can fit the bill better than you, then why don't you assemble some sort of case for one of these supposedly much better-suited people, rather than making up traits about yourself that were never included in your initial self-description to hopefully get yourself off the hook? So far, you say that you listen to directions well. You never stated that initially, though you claim that it's "implied." Guess what? Your competitiveness when you're having fun IMPLIES that you can become aggressive in any given situation. Don't you just love implications?
Alice Edvige
Let me restate your argument in less words for the people:
Part 1: I'm assuming the wolf magically grows when some artificial title is put on it.
Part 2: I'm ignoring evidence to the contrary because I don't like it.
Part 3: I know my case svcks, go make a better one! I didn't get to know you well enough, but now let me say you got aggressive because you got competitive even though you weren't competing with anyone.
Comon now. Put some effort into it. That whole last monologue was a defeated effort.
