Ubisoft scraps always-on DRM

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:29 am

In part two of our series of "Robbio Reposting News from his RSS feed", it appears as though dear old Ubisoft is truly scrapping their always-on DRM for games.

http://www.playerattack.com/news/2012/09/05/ubisoft-scraps-always-on-drm/

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/09/05/ubisoft-drm-piracy-interview/

In an apparently positive, but nonetheless rather surprising step, Ubisoft says "We’ve heard you," and has announced plans to change its "always-on" DRM policy.

Since the beginning, Ubisoft has copped a lot of flak from customers over its DRM implementations. Ranging from the simple, always online model which required a high-speed internet connection for even single player games, Ubi also introduced a strict activation policy, limiting the number of PCs a game could be installed on.

Both styles lead to problems, when authentication servers crashed or wouldn't respond, or - controversially - when relatively minor hardware changes were recorded as an additional activation, meaning that games like Anno 2070 were potentially unplayable once you installed that new graphics card.

Stephanie Perotti is worldwide director for online games at Ubisoft, and she explains that the decision was actually made quite a while ago:

We have listened to feedback, and since June last year our policy for all of PC games is that we only require a one-time online activation when you first install the game, and from then you are free to play the game offline.

In an interview with Rock, Paper, Shotgun Perotti and corporate communications manager Michael Burk acknowledge that the publisher has made a number of "unfortunate comments" relating to piracy, activation limits, and whether or not the whole thing was working as intended.

Perotti explains the new situation, using Assassin's Creed III as an example:

Whenever you want to reach any online service, multiplayer, you will have to be connected, and obviously for online games you will also need to be online to play. But if you want to enjoy Assassin’s Creed III single player, you will be able to do that without being connected. And you will be able to activate the game on as many machines as you want.

Neither Perotti nor Burk are willing to discuss piracy figures in any detail, explaining that the information is competitive, and internally confidential ("not necessarily that we’re breaking anyone’s confidentiality," explains Burk). The pair acknowledge that by not acknowledging the numbers, they're weakening their own argument.

However, one number that Burk is willing to hand over is the fact that all of this fuss over PC gaming really is just a small chunk of Ubisoft's market. Consoles still reign supreme at the French publisher, with PC sales making up roughly 10% of revenue (7% last full fiscal year, 12% in the last quarter).

The whole thing is very PR-talk in reading the full interview. Neither of the Ubisoft employees will openly acknowledge that always-on-DRM was a god-awful failure that just made PC Gamers get peeved, but at least this is a sign that someone at that company has some sort of cognitive activity going on.
User avatar
Michelle Serenity Boss
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:49 am

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:08 am

So they don't have potatuhs in their ears after all. Huh.
User avatar
Valerie Marie
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:29 am

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:48 pm

+1 Ubisoft
-1 EA

Is today a good or bad day for gaming?
User avatar
Marine x
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:54 am

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:54 am

I'll believe it when I see it.
User avatar
Cayal
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:24 pm

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:08 pm

+1 Ubisoft
-1 EA

Is today a good or bad day for gaming?
At least one publisher surprises, in a positive manner. That's good in my book.
User avatar
Jack Walker
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:25 pm

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:21 am

In the end, I don't really care. These companies [censored] up, pretend they give a [censored] every once in a while, and then go back to [censored] up. They can do whatever the hell they want, because I can't bring myself to care anymore.
User avatar
Maya Maya
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:35 pm

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 7:13 am

I'll believe it when I see it.
this. although i don't have any ubisoft games for the pc. the only games of theirs i forsee my self playing are the assasin creed ones, and i will be getting those for console.
User avatar
luis ortiz
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:21 pm

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:42 pm

Its good to know that I won't have anymore DRM on those Ubisoft games I don't play anyway.
User avatar
sam smith
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:55 am

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:00 pm

+1 Ubisoft
-1 EA

Is today a good or bad day for gaming?
Nothing but a reckoning.
User avatar
teeny
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:51 am

Post » Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:32 am

I think I have owned 1, maybe 2, Ubisoft games in my 25 years of gaming... maybe if they made something I would enjoy I would buy it.
User avatar
Paula Ramos
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:43 am


Return to Othor Games