Conjuration question.

Post » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:58 am

I have never made a build that uses conjuration until now. I made a warrior that uses conjuration to back up. My question is, which side is better the atronachs or the zombie(?) route?
User avatar
John Moore
 
Posts: 3294
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:18 am

Post » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:11 am

atronachs still the best way....
User avatar
Rachel Eloise Getoutofmyface
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:20 pm

Post » Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:20 pm

Both work very well.
Don't use the atronach stone if you plan on summoning your own atronach's,it will absorb half of your summoning spells.
By absorb I mean it will not actually make the summons appear but it will use the required magicka.

Zombies are a lot of fun but there main weakness is that you need to either find or create a dead body in the first place.
To help with this I use a stealth,Illusionist,archery and alchemist character.
There is lots of offense to this character but no defense,it's fun ffor me.

Since you are a warrior,I would go with summoning atronachs.It's easier to do and faster,wich could help the faster paced warrior character.
But as I suggested,just stay away from the atronach standing stone.
User avatar
Rachael
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:10 pm

Post » Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:01 am

Necromancy vs Atromancy(Daedramany)

Necromancy Pro: Less point investment.

Necromnacy Con: You need a dead body to use it.

Atromancy(Daedramancy) Pro: Can use it anytime you want.

Atromancy(Daedramancy) Con: More point investment.

Also summoning is unreliable with spell absorbtion buffs.
User avatar
Elizabeth Lysons
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:16 am


Return to V - Skyrim