RAM: 3.8 vs. 4 (recommended)

Post » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:43 am

I am 0.2... units, I guess (I can't computer) below the recommended value of RAM; is it at all worth it to attempt to upgrade?
User avatar
Penny Flame
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:53 am

Post » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:14 am

If you run a 64-bit OS, then yes. It will give the other stuff running (the OS and/or any other stuff running along side) more room to work with without cannibalizing the available memory for Skyrim.
User avatar
Rodney C
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:54 am

Post » Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:32 am

Okey-dokey.

Since I'm using a laptop, is that at all prohibitive to upgrading? Like, for example, I know that I can't upgrade the graphics card without buying an entirely new laptop -- is the same true of RAM?
User avatar
Isaiah Burdeau
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:58 am

Post » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:50 pm

Not for RAM. You just need to check to see if your laptop supports more, like any computer. Once you do that, it's really a simple matter of opening the door on the bottom and dropping it in. :)
User avatar
Guy Pearce
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 3:08 pm

Post » Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:25 pm

The only reason for any computer to only have an odd number such a "3.8" GBs of RAM is when any part of the video graphics available is some sort of onboard entry level substitute for the real thing, most likely the smoke and mirrors trickery that Intel prefers to foist off on unwary shoppers. Intel doesn't give their integrated chip any memory of its own, so it steals from the main memory pool.

nVIDIA make a lot of laptop GPU devices that have had half of their functions either omitted or else deactivated. They use Intel's chips to take on the duties of the removed first stage graphics functions.
User avatar
leni
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:58 pm


Return to V - Skyrim