Page 4 of 5

is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 7:51 pm
by ~Amy~

Wasteland workshop offers tamings creatures and NPC's to fight in arena death matchs, nixie tube lighting, letter kits, taxidermy and more. Horse armor adds horse armor. I don't see the comparison.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 1:40 am
by Cash n Class

People compare it because it doesn't add much content. What you described is not much content at all.



There should be new quests at least 10 hours long and some of the vanilla video game world map of Fallout 4 to be extended and then there wouldn't be a comparison at all.



Adding new items or customizable robots or a arena, letter kits, and taxidermy or whatever should just be a free DLC.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:21 pm
by Jodie Bardgett


True indeed. I can relate to settlements kind of being counterproductive outside of storing junk and taking a nap, since settlers don't even interact with most furniture pieces. They don't even converse among each other like NPCs did in Skyrim. Settlers could at least play a game of pool, shoot some hoops or flip through some of your magazines. Some of my settlements don't even sleep period, ever since the latest patch 1.4 update.



One of the most backwards things about settlements is that annoying 'Please Stand By' signal broadcasted on TVs. There should be a way to disable the signal and at least get some SPECIAL videos, in-game ads or the pre war news speech about the bombs dropping shown on the TVs. I even saw the doctor in the Memory Den typing on a terminal with a 'Please Stand By' signal on her monitor, lol


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 2:18 pm
by Blessed DIVA

Would you please stop saying "smaller dlc's should be free"?

Do you also go to the store and tell them that single cans of soda should be free because they are not as big as a twelve-pack?

is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 4:58 pm
by SEXY QUEEN

I'm against DLC's like this being sold. I will not let go without a fight, even if nothing ever happens.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:41 pm
by chirsty aggas
How is getting new workshop content plus the ability to capture enemies and use them for our amusemant even remotely the same thing as ONLY getting horse armor??

is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 2:16 pm
by SUck MYdIck
Nah, it's all good.


Don't know why people have to complain about everything.

is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:43 am
by Penny Flame

El Che would be proud?


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 2:13 pm
by Ricky Meehan


Don't forget your sword of capitalist smiting +15




But seriously, maybe actually try playing the game before complaining about it? Automatron was well worth the cost and i bet WW will be too.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:34 pm
by Erin S



you can use a "glitch" to decrease the cap


drop any weapon (the more complex the better) and then put them back to the workshop or just scavenge them


i did this a lot and it really helps


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:37 pm
by Claire

Did you seriously have to bring that up?



Is it a problem that I am part socialist?


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:57 pm
by Scared humanity


Wait, what? i didn't even know you are Socialist until you just brought it up, i was making a joke.




I am Socialist for crying out loud.




And please, do not let my attempt at a joke turn this into a political thread, that is the last thing we need.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:32 am
by Ricky Meehan





So, you are saying that people/companies should have no right to chose the size of the things they create, and charge a price for them still?

So, soda companies should not be allowed to sell single cans of soda...since they should only sell full cases of it?
So, tire companies should not sell tires...since they should only sell WHOLE cars?
So, a movie company should not sell single movies...since they turn out to be part of a trilogy?

Sorry, to say it, but, you seem to be...ummm...something.

is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:28 am
by Cccurly


You do know that small DLC were supposed to be the entire point? "Microtransactions"? Small bits of stuff, for small amounts of money? And then it got out of control, the prices started going up, and we got piles of articles/threads moaning about how these transactions weren't all that "micro" anymore?




If people want to compare DLCs, why aren't they comparing WW to Hearthfire? Both $5, both having to do with building stuff, both from relatively close eras (instead of the stupidity of comparing a failed experiment from the dawn of DLC to modern stuff), etc. WW compares quite favorably, I think.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 1:58 am
by Dewayne Quattlebaum

Soda companies should be allowed to be able to sell single cans of soda. Tire companies should be able to sell individual tires if they want to. Movie companies should be allowed to sell single movies.



Those are physical manufactured items requiring factories and tens of thousands of people if not hundreds of thousands of people who need to get point.



Video games are developed by hundreds of people as well who should get paid, but that's not the point I'm trying to make at all.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:51 pm
by Len swann

So, in your opinion Software Developement is the only business that creates a product and should be forced to give it away for free?

Business is business, and product is product.
If you create, you set the price you want.
If the customer doesn't think it is worth that price...they vote with their wallets.
It really is a simple concept...that you seem to "just not get".

is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 5:21 am
by James Baldwin

I'm VERY interested in this DLC.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:43 pm
by Nymph

I'm not saying people in the software development business should develop software to give away for free.



I'm talking about giving VALUE to your customers who purchase your video game(s).



Believe it or not it has been a proven fact that if you release DLC"s for free for your video games, and keep updating your video games with patches, and sell expansion packs the video game(s) will sell more copies on that day than on a regular day.



If Bethesda Game Studios said they would give Automatron and Wasteland Workshop away for free for Fallout 4 I guarantee you sales of Fallout 4 would of gone even higher than what they are going up right now.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:35 am
by Bloomer


You



Have



Not



Played



The



Game


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:27 pm
by Romy Welsch

The worst is that no one has even played it yet and there's still one or two people talking about it's "value".


No actually, the worst is Ballowers who hasn't even played the game, let alone purchased it, who has said he expects "rewards" from developers for purchasing their games HAHAHA


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:40 pm
by Matt Fletcher

Laugh if you want, but there are some video game developers who say we should be rewarded with free content for purchasing their video game(s) and should only be charged money to purchase content when there's lots of it like expansion packs.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:45 pm
by naome duncan

I'd like to see your source on this "proven fact"




I'll wait.


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 5:36 am
by Stryke Force

"Value" is decided by the customer.
Again, they (customers) have the right to "vote with their wallets".

And, if you are so worried about how a company chooses to do it's business...either get a job running said company, or buy said company.
Otherwise, it is the company's choice of what product they offer and at what price they offer it.
Again: "Vote with your wallet".
Nagging on a forum, saying that "this should be free", and kicking a dead horse, only makes you look bad...not the company which is acting within it's rights.

is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:41 pm
by loste juliana


And you would know that Bethesda has added free stuff, if you had bought the game...


is there a danger WW could become the new Horse Armour?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 7:40 pm
by Kim Kay

I already "vote with my wallet" I still haven't purchased Fallout 4 to this day today. The reason I made this account in 2011 is to criticize Bethesda Softworks and Bethesda Game Studios.



Just not purchasing and not saying anything won't really do anything.