I'm really disappointed at apple, I wanted an iPhone 5, 4S, to me, is just an overpriced add on, much like MW3. I've never had an iPhone and have been saving forever for #5. what a letdown... :bolt: :ahhh:

So buy an Android phone?

Get the Samsung Galaxy II S

I've been hearing people say this all day. What are these amazing features that the iPhone 5 was supposed to have that the 4S won't?

Hasn't that always been the case?

Don't get it then if you don't like it. Just stick with your iPhone 4 or whatever and know how lucky you are to have one of those.

Sleeker, slimer, sixyer. You know, apple magic.

Read the OP, I have NO iPhone and never have

Ooh, a slimey phone? Sounds awesome.

Don't worry, they'll be happy to take your money later. Besides, they're too busy suing people for stealing ideas that they stole fair and square to release an iPhone with a whole new number on it right now. Just buy some really fancy, overpriced new shoes. It'll have the same effect.

Oh, then get the newest one if you can... or something equivalent. I've always wanted an iPhone... or an iPod.

So even though it has a dual core processor, an 8 megapixel camera and can record 1080p videos, it still svcks because it's not smaller? :shakehead:

Honestly, it's not even that people think it's not worth the price, because it probably isn't. It's that they think the iPhone 5 would have any better features than the 4S just because it's called the iPhone 5.

Do I hear sarcasm???......

Spoiler alert:
peace bullet dies at the end of this thread... .. .

Aww. You should've put a spoiler tag.

Yeah, I don't see what all the hype is over the Iphone anyways.

This.

I don't like Apple. I got rid of my ipod and never looked back. My Motorola Triumph does everything I need and a lot more.

So, if they slapped a 5 onto it instead of an S you would like it more? Because it'd be no different.

Repost:

iPhone 4S: No HSPA+, no LTE, no WiMAX, no NFC. Barely does anything better than the iPhone 4 ( http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/iphone-4s-vs-iphone-4-the-tale-of-the-tape/ )... how on earth is this thing considered better enough to warrant an extra $100 over the iPhone 4? How can it not support the leading technologies that are in pretty much every high-end android phone being sold at the same price points? How can idiotic Sprint customers even consider it a good buy when EVDO on Sprint is horribly slow, and web browsing is only enjoyable on their WiMAX network?

Galaxy S II (a phone going on 3/4 yr old) beats the iPhone 4S in almost every category http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/iphone-4s-vs-the-smartphone-elite-galaxy-s-ii-bionic-and-tita/

Don't know how....

And let the Android revolution continue.