Well. Considering police are training in CQC to detain and disarm suspects if they don't pose an immediate lethal danger [i.e pointing a gun at you and shooting], my guess is wait for the guy who is charging, and whom is probably not thinking and going to do an obvious jab or strike with the knife, when he swings, move, grab his arm, twist his wrist, put it to his back and drop him on his face on the ground.
:lol:
That there is a fantasy. Did you read that http://www.nononsenseselfdefense.com/knifelies.html I gave you earlier? To sum it up: controlling someone else's knife is very difficult, getting hurt by a knife is very easy, every knife wound reduces your ability to do anything, even one knife wound can put a person into shock (a physical state that is difficult to overcome), a knife is an
extremely deadly weapon within it's range.
The article states
The police may or may not have been aware of the homeless man's mental illness, BUT, he was threatening someone he knew with that knife. The job of the police is to protect the populace. That includes making sure that a knife wielding mentally unstable homeless man does not incapacitate them and obtain their weapons, which would further endanger others. It is sad that the homeless man died, and it is even more tragic that an innocent bystander was killed. It could have been worse. The homeless man could have gotten hold of their guns. Mentally ill people can exhibit tremendous strenght and cunning. Mental illness does not equal physical weakness or lethargy.
True, though I don't think there have been any statements regarding the bloke's health (he may not have been ill). Drug/alcohol use is a strong possibility (sadly), with similar results.
Great. Officers with the mental capacity of a chicken infront of a meat grinder, that fire weapons off in such as fashion they can't hit their target <_<
You try hitting a fast moving target every shot in a high stress situation. It could well be that the stray bullet was the only one out of half a dozen, which would be hitting the target more than 92% of the time. All it took was
one stray bullet, not a storm of them. But we have no such statistics whatsoever, which means we can't make any proper conclusion one way or the other.
As for the suspect being under a narcotic. I don't expect a homeless guy to have much drug use in his system [obviously. this could easily be untrue], but if a guy is cutting open garbage bags for tin cans to sell... you think he's got money for a drug strong enough that he's going to pull a Rodney King? Lol.
If someone has 24 hours a day to scraqe up the money for one high and doesn't 'waste' any money on things like food, they will get high at least once. I'm not familiar with the prices, but I'm pretty sure $20 will get you at least one dose, and that isn't
too hard to scraqe together. Alcohol, too, can be had fairly easily (in this part of the world, you can pick up a 4L (~1gal) cask of goon for $15 without shopping around).
Also. By your logic, anyone who poses a threat should be shot on sight to avoid confrontation. If I have the training to break someones arm who is coming at me with a knife, then i'd preferably break their arm to shooting them. Why? Well, for one. I shoot him, and my plea of self-defense turns into man-slaughter and I go to jail for 10-15 years.
A knife at two feet is
at least as deadly as a gun at twenty. Knife wounds can be messy in a way that lower calibre full jacket bullets can't match, knives can be pretty fast in
any hands, almost any part of a knife will hurt you... knives are not to be underestimated. The only sane way of dealing with a knife is to either 1) Run the bloody hell way 2) If you're absolutely forced to, use a weapon with more range (longish stick will do) and keep enough distance to maintain your advantage.
Anyone more experienced in dealing with knives
in real life see anything to contradict?