Time Travel, what do you think?

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:15 pm

Didn't want to read through the whole thread, so I'm not sure is this has been posted; It's impossible to travel back before the time machine was created, you can only go forward, or to the original creation date.


---------------------- :bunny: ---------------------

The bunny is the date the time machine was invented, you travel in time from that point onward.

And I'm not just pulling this out of my ass, it was on some show I watched. And it's the reason we don't see people from the future.
User avatar
cassy
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:57 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:44 pm

Who said we haven't? :shifty:

I see time travelers every day :shrug:
User avatar
Joanne
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:08 am

Didn't want to read through the whole thread, so I'm not sure is this has been posted; It's impossible to travel back before the time machine was created, you can only go forward, or to the original creation date.


---------------------- :bunny: ---------------------

The bunny is the date the time machine was invented, you travel in time from that point onward.

And I'm not just pulling this out of my ass, it was on some show I watched. And it's the reason we don't see people from the future.


that's how I see it & seen it described similarly on the science channel
User avatar
KiiSsez jdgaf Benzler
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:10 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:14 am

3.) A person doing this would die during the process and it would be too expensive to run again since we can't utilize a better fuel than fossil fuels

Or we could go back to the dinosaurs, kill them, plant them in the ground, collect fuel, go back and do it again. It's like an extremely dangerous gold farming.
User avatar
Robert DeLarosa
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 3:43 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:25 pm

Time doesn't slow down for the traveler. As you approach the speed of light, you achieve http://www.thebigview.com/spacetime/timedilation.html. So time elsewhere is stretched (from the travelers' frame of reference), but it can't be infinitely so. If faster than light travel in the conventional sense (straight from point A to point B ) were possible, time elsewhere might be wrapped around so that it would reverse. Look at the link and view the formula. For reverse time to happen, you would need to make the denominator negative, which means Velocity (v) would have to be greater than the Speed of Light ( c ). It can't divide by zero or else the whole universe blows up :P


Good point...Now I remember why I stopped thinking about this stuff. Back to the kitchen where I still know how things work I go!
User avatar
Darrell Fawcett
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:34 pm

first off how do we know there haven't been time travlers, i mean if i was hopping thru time i wouldn't want to advertise it, i mean everyone would probably ask questions and what not.

Also could you really change time? seems like if you went back in time you would...crap how to say that? It would be like you always went back into time, that you couldn't change things becuase if you did then you would cease to live in the reality you came from...and then you couldn't have traveled time...paradoxes make my head hurt
User avatar
Taylah Haines
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:10 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:52 am

Also could you really change time? seems like if you went back in time you would...crap how to say that? It would be like you always went back into time, that you couldn't change things becuase if you did then you would cease to live in the reality you came from...and then you couldn't have traveled time...paradoxes make my head hurt

Check my post (#7) in this thread. If time travel were only possible by moving to another universe (like a copy), then that would take care of any paradoxes.
User avatar
Umpyre Records
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:19 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:15 pm

Time doesn't slow down for the traveler. As you approach the speed of light, you achieve http://www.thebigview.com/spacetime/timedilation.html. So time elsewhere is stretched (from the travelers' frame of reference), but it can't be infinitely so. If faster than light travel in the conventional sense (straight from point A to point B ) were possible, time elsewhere might be wrapped around so that it would reverse. Look at the link and view the formula. For reverse time to happen, you would need to make the denominator negative, which means Velocity (v) would have to be greater than the Speed of Light ( c ). It can't divide by zero or else the whole universe blows up :P
If they're right about neutrino's going faster than light, this whole theory is thrown out the window.

A time traveler would be immensely powerful. They'd have access to any point in time; one example of the repercussions is that they would able to use tanks in the Stone Age. No, I don't think we'll ever invent the time machine. Upon its creation, there would undoubtedly have been someone who would abuse the technology of the future such that we would see evidence of futuristic technology used to gain someone great power. Be it militarily or otherwise. Unless there are some benevolent time traveling police who can stop all of this, therefore, if it is created, it doesn't serve much of a purpose other than historical accuracy. I'm of the opinion that humans cannot create everything they can imagine. All of our technology has been based off of natural occurrences; so, should there be no natural occurrence which presents itself or exists regarding time travel, it would be beyond our grasp to fabricate one.
User avatar
Pawel Platek
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 2:08 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:59 pm

If they're right about neutrino's going faster than light, this whole theory is thrown out the window.

Not necessarily. Neutrino's are sub-atomic particles (the smallest single object we know of) with nearly zero mass. Therefore, sub-atomic particles moving through space and time would likely have little or no effect on the universe. Theories also don't get thrown out because one instance contradicts it. It may change our understanding of neutrinos, but for everything else, General Relativity remains valid.


To everyone asking where are all the time travelers? Here is a possible answer: The technology doesn't exist yet :P
User avatar
Hayley Bristow
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 12:24 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:25 pm

One day man will understand the workings of the Universe in exact detail.

That day isn't now.

At one point flight wasn't possible,or a cure for Polio,or any number of things..so why not time travel?
User avatar
Stefanny Cardona
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:08 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:28 am


To everyone asking where are all the time travelers? Here is a possible answer: The technology doesn't exist yet :P


Or they all wanted to save the Titanic, dooming the ship with all the extra weight
User avatar
Stephanie Kemp
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:39 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:46 pm

If they're right about neutrino's going faster than light, this whole theory is thrown out the window.

A time traveler would be immensely powerful. They'd have access to any point in time; one example of the repercussions is that they would able to use tanks in the Stone Age. No, I don't think we'll ever invent the time machine. Upon its creation, there would undoubtedly have been someone who would abuse the technology of the future such that we would see evidence of futuristic technology used to gain someone great power. Be it militarily or otherwise. Unless there are some benevolent time traveling police who can stop all of this, therefore, if it is created, it doesn't serve much of a purpose other than historical accuracy. I'm of the opinion that humans cannot create everything they can imagine. All of our technology has been based off of natural occurrences; so, should there be no natural occurrence which presents itself or exists regarding time travel, it would be beyond our grasp to fabricate one.

Not necessarily. Neutrino's are sub-atomic particles (the smallest single object we know of) with nearly zero mass. Therefore, sub-atomic particles moving through space and time would likely have little or no effect on the universe. Theories also don't get thrown out because one instance contradicts it. It may change our understanding of neutrinos, but for everything else, General Relativity remains valid.


To everyone asking where are all the time travelers? Here is a possible answer: The technology doesn't exist yet :P

While it impossible to accelerate to or past the speed of light, traveling faster than the speed of light or accelerating from there is not an impossibility. Just really frolicking impossible.
User avatar
Invasion's
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:09 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:07 am

I dont believe it is possible in the sense that it is believed to be possible. One could however time travel to the future but not the past as time is man created so therefore it does not exist outside man's realm.

Time wasn't created by man, timekeeping was.
User avatar
Stephy Beck
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:33 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:13 am

Check my post (#7) in this thread. If time travel were only possible by moving to another universe (like a copy), then that would take care of any paradoxes.

Couldn't that also mean infinite resources, if taking something back from a copied universe was possible? :celebration:
User avatar
[ becca ]
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:59 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:58 pm

Time dilation is a well understood and measurable phenomenon. However, to experience significant time dilation relative to the rest of the species would require either a very fast spaceship, or traveling to a region of space with a gravitational field much stronger than that on earth. (e.g. near a black hole)

Traveling backward in time is impossible according to current theory, as it would require infinite energy.
User avatar
X(S.a.R.a.H)X
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:33 am

Well I'm younger now than I was when I was 7.


Take that science! :flamethrower:

This is true for me too, I'm said to be more of a 3yr old now than I was when I was actually 3 :dance:
User avatar
BethanyRhain
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:50 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:02 am

Let's assume someone actually created a time-machine, right now. He was drunk, so he doesn't actually know how it works, only that it does work.. Somehow. He does know it can take us back in time and forward in time, but that's about it. Would we evgen consider using it? We can't know if it creates a copy of the universe, or if we actually go back in our time or what. We might end up destroying something significant in the past, altering our present time in a way of no-one could even imagine. A time machine without 100% knowledge of what actually happens, is a dangerous machine and shouldn't be used even if it was invented.

____________________________________


Why we haven't seen any time travelers makes perfect sense when countered with the theory that you can't travel back in time further than to the point at which it was created, as some of you have pointed out :)
User avatar
Eileen Müller
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:06 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:55 pm

and time is more accuratly a measurement of distance and gravity than it actually is common mistaken for a physical "train track" that can be rode forwards and backwards upon.

One of the clearest ways to describe time: It's like the other (physical) dimensions, except completely different.

Not necessarily. Neutrino's are sub-atomic particles (the smallest single object we know of) with nearly zero mass. Therefore, sub-atomic particles moving through space and time would likely have little or no effect on the universe. Theories also don't get thrown out because one instance contradicts it. It may change our understanding of neutrinos, but for everything else, General Relativity remains valid.

If you could control it well enough, you could create a communication device. Unfortunately you'd only be able to communicate with people who knew your standards/protocols and had the technology to monitor what you're sending... in other words, you'd be restricted to any point after the thing was invented.

Even that could have some challenging hurdles, since even if you sit dead still, you're still moving at hundreds of kilometres per second. In other words, if you changed your time-location by half a minute without adjusting you space-location, you'd find yourself a quite long way from home.

EDIT: "other (physical) dimensions", not "other (physical) dimension", ijit :rolleyes:.
User avatar
Robert Jr
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:49 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:38 am

Couldn't that also mean infinite resources, if taking something back from a copied universe was possible? :celebration:

You know, now that you mention it, Adding matter/energy to a universe could have unforeseen effects. I learned something interesting in my Physics class this term. Every particle in the universe has a gravitational effect on every other particle. Of course for most particles, that effect is so minuscule, but a strand of hair for example has a gravitational effect on Jupiter.

This is the gravitational formula: g = G(m1*m2)/r^2, where big G is a gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are separate non-zero mass particles and r is the distance between them.

Now here is the biggest mystery. Does gravity have a speed? If something were to pop into existence in this universe, say a time traveler, how long would it take for the gravitational effect to be measured on something else? Would it be instant? Would it completely mess up everything?

Also, think about this: If someone were to time travel to this day and age, they would likely bring other travelers as well, like disease. Going back in time could introduce pestilence to an ecosystem that could potentially destroy it. Perhaps it would be best to never use the technology even if it's possible.


One of the clearest ways to describe time: It's like the other (physical) dimensions, except completely different.


If you could control it well enough, you could create a communication device. Unfortunately you'd only be able to communicate with people who knew your standards/protocols and had the technology to monitor what you're sending... in other words, you'd be restricted to any point after the thing was invented.

Even that could have some challenging hurdles, since even if you sit dead still, you're still moving at hundreds of kilometres per second. In other words, if you changed your time-location by half a minute without adjusting you space-location, you'd find yourself a quite long way from home.

EDIT: "other (physical) dimensions", not "other (physical) dimension", ijit :rolleyes:.

You should read the book "The Light of Other Days" by Arther C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter. It's about using worm-holes to transmit information through time.

As for moving in space, it might depend on your frame of reference. Since we all have the same frame of reference here on earth (we are moving at a non-accelerating rate) it might be able to adjust by itself. Communication from other FoRs would definitely be trickier.
User avatar
Hannah Barnard
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:42 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:26 pm

Maybe in the future the US or Japan or some other super advanced nation made a time machine, but they bred agents specifically for going back into time so they were never to be detected, and maybe each agent is assigned a year and that is their whole life, continously going through the same year over and over discovering new things everyday, that would be fun.
User avatar
Jessica Lloyd
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:11 pm

Previous

Return to Othor Games