Beginning of the end of Hulu?

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 7:41 am

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2403773,00.asp

Apparently sometime in the future Hulu may require you to be a cable subscriber in order to use their service. At this news (even if it's just speculation) I canceled my Hulu subscription and listed this story as my reason. I enjoyed Hulu, but they need to know this isn't going to fly. The standard cable package here is $75 a month. Hulu is $7.99 a month. I'm not going to pay $80+ just to watch TV.
User avatar
Roanne Bardsley
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:57 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 9:09 am

Remember the Qwikster debacle with Netflix? Hulu will realize this is a [censored] idea and abandon it if they know what's good for them (read as: money).
User avatar
MR.BIGG
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 1:24 am

Remember the Qwikster debacle with Netflix? Hulu will realize this is a [censored] idea and abandon it if they know what's good for them (read as: money).
Thing you're not realizing is that they may not have a whole lot of choice, if they wish to retain their variety of available programming. Hulu is in part owned by Comcast, after all. So complain to Comcast if you want to complain.
Even if Comcast doesn't follow through with this, the notion is out now and it wouldn't surprise me to see owners of other station programming doing something similar...some kind of way to cripple places like Hulu's ability to show content (for super cheap) online that people are actually interested in. If nothing else, they could put a much longer delay before stuff is available to watch.

That said....I don't like it, of course. Even tho I pay for cable. Hulu is not Comcast's personal Xfinity website....they're supposed to be separate. Otherwise what's the point.
User avatar
Emily Rose
 
Posts: 3482
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:56 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 6:42 am

Thing you're not realizing is that they may not have a whole lot of choice, if they wish to retain their variety of available programming.

...Why? It's doing just fine how it is now. Any influence by Comcast is, evidently, illegal.
User avatar
Anthony Diaz
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:24 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:14 pm

...Why? It's doing just fine how it is now.
I mean that the cost or conditions of being able to show many shows could become prohibitive in some way, as networks/copyright owners start to find ways to slow things down/find profit on their own away from the original starter site services.

Any influence by Comcast is, evidently, illegal.
Possibly. That's for a court to decide, if it goes there. I'm sure Comcast has lawyers etc. that think they've found loopholes around the merger legal stuff or they wouldn't have tried.
User avatar
Vahpie
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:07 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 8:16 am

Hulu is $7.99 a month.
I thought Hulu was free.
User avatar
Anna Kyselova
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:42 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 3:53 am

I thought Hulu was free.

Hulu+ costs $7.99 per month. The difference is that it provides access to streaming certain episodes and shows that are not available with a free Hulu account.

Sadly, you still have to watch commercials with a paid Hulu+ subscription. I think this is critical error on the part of Hulu's executives, although I can understand why it was implemented.
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 9:57 am

Sadly, you still have to watch commercials with a paid Hulu+ subscription. I think this is critical error on the part of Hulu's executives, although I can understand why it was implemented.

this is why i don't use hulu at all. when i stream shows online the single most important thing is that my experience not be interupted, buffering or other wise.
User avatar
Mariaa EM.
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:28 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 4:11 am

Meh, never liked Hulu's selection anyway. Stuff disappears too fast from there, even from Hulu+

There was a time when Hulu was useful, but the networks have been stripping it of shows and putting all sorts of dumb time restrictions on it for too long now.
User avatar
HARDHEAD
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 9:02 am

I wrote off Hulu quite a while ago. Initially it was great, but then the amount of commercials started increasing significantly, fewer episodes were available to watch, and so forth. Basically it was easy to see the writing on the wall (considering that Hulu is owned by cable companies and TV networks), and so far my expectations have pretty much all been born out. It's unfortunate, but the legacy content providers seem intent on trying to turn online content distribution into mirror of cable TV, even as people are expressing their displeasure with cable TV by cancelling the service in increasing numbers. The sooner they all die out the better.
User avatar
Stephanie Valentine
 
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:09 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 5:34 am

I really liked Hulu when it first came out. Though now it doesn't include enough of the shows that I like and the ads have become increasingly intrusive. I haven't actually gone to Hulu in a long while.

For my TV needs I rely on my trust TiVo to record what I want. Been thinking about setting up an HTPC, but not sure how much effort I want to put into it.
User avatar
cosmo valerga
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:21 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 10:31 am

I never used Hulu that much....but that's probably because I have cable. :P For the big screen TV, I much prefer seeing shows/movies in higher quality HD than what the internet calls "HD".

And I definitely wouldn't pay Hulu to watch commercials. I can see commercials for free using a roof antenna.
User avatar
dav
 
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:46 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:14 am

Sadly, you still have to watch commercials with a paid Hulu+ subscription. I think this is critical error on the part of Hulu's executives, although I can understand why it was implemented.

This is also the case with Sky, who spam you with the maximum legally permissible amount of adverts on most of their channels in spite of charging an arm and a leg for the service. Which is why we're looking to cancel our subscription.
User avatar
SUck MYdIck
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:43 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 10:43 pm

Please, please, for the love of everything, give me an actual option to download shows, on the day they are released (also, worldwide releases), without subscribing to something that has nothing to do with the internet. And why do I even have to subscribe to something? I want to watch Game of Thrones - why can't I go to the HBO website, click "buy episode" and watch the damn thing?

Its 2012. The internet is not a new invention, I don't have a landline anymore, I don't even use SMS anymore, I don't watch TV anymore, so why the [censored] [censored] [censored] are you holding on to these relics of the past?

This is also the case with Sky, who spam you with the maximum legally permissible amount of adverts on most of their channels in spite of charging an arm and a leg for the service. Which is why we're looking to cancel our subscription.

And this too ^

We cancelled our Sky subscription when every channel started showing nothing but repeats, Discovery, NatGeo etc all became endless reality series, and we still get way too many ads.

I would happily pay the BBC a liscening fee if they would broadcast their channels here.
User avatar
Carlos Rojas
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:19 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:20 am

And I definitely wouldn't pay Hulu to watch commercials. I can see commercials for free using a roof antenna.
Isn't it the same with cable TV? They overcharge you and still have tons of commercials.
User avatar
Melly Angelic
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:11 pm

I've never paid for cable There's a couple channels I want, but I cant just get those couple channels.. for some odd reason. Everything Id watch I can watch on YouTube and the bandwidth use is reasonable with YouTube.
User avatar
alyssa ALYSSA
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:36 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 5:02 am

Isn't it the same with cable TV? They overcharge you and still have tons of commercials.
Yes but they have tons of channels that I can't get solely with a roof antenna. Most of these channels are utter crap of course, but there are several that I still want/like having around. I tend to view cable these days more as a method to get access to other stuff, tho...sports packages and such, and of course, commercial free movie channels and pay-per-view rentals. Their free HD on-demand has become about as good as Hulu, really, which means I don't even need a DVR to keep up with most series.

Edit: not that I would've paid for cable when I was 18. Or if I only cared about watching CSI and NCIS or something. :)
User avatar
Rebecca Clare Smith
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:13 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 4:27 am

Does having Directv mean that I am out of the loop for this conversation?
User avatar
Marion Geneste
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:21 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 1:12 am

Good to know, I almost got Hulu but now that they are thinking of doing things like this I am not going to unless the speculation goes away.
User avatar
Brandi Norton
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:24 pm

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 2:33 am

Does having Directv mean that I am out of the loop for this conversation?

Not sure. I know in your Hulu settings now it asks you to link either a Dish Network account or Verizon account for additional access. So if they have some kind of deal with Dish Network, maybe they wouldn't honor Direct TV subscriptions?
User avatar
Nuno Castro
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:40 am

Post » Fri May 04, 2012 1:34 am

Please, please, for the love of everything, give me an actual option to download shows, on the day they are released (also, worldwide releases), without subscribing to something that has nothing to do with the internet. And why do I even have to subscribe to something? I want to watch Game of Thrones - why can't I go to the HBO website, click "buy episode" and watch the damn thing?

Its 2012. The internet is not a new invention, I don't have a landline anymore, I don't even use SMS anymore, I don't watch TV anymore, so why the [censored] [censored] [censored] are you holding on to these relics of the past?
We should go into business and start a streaming service for New Zealand.
User avatar
Dustin Brown
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:55 am


Return to Othor Games