whats the best anti aliasing to use

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 12:38 pm

ive never really bothered with it as i never notice much difference in most games, but when i tried super sampling aa with mass effect2 it looked amazing, does it make a big diff with skyrim, whats the best one to use that gives best picture, also whats the difference between fxaa in the skyrim settings and the fxaa post process injector are they the same thing

thanks
User avatar
Invasion's
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:09 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 8:49 am

The FXAA injector lets you tweak it to you liking and add sharpening. Supersample AA is if you want the best fidelity but comes at a massive cost in GPU performance. A lot of games use a lot of post processing or a rendering method that doesn't support MSAA in DX9 and that's where FXAA comes in.
User avatar
I love YOu
 
Posts: 3505
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:05 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 11:31 am

ok cheers mate, what do you think is the best aa for skyrim, should i use just skyrims fxaa, or use ccc adaptive or what? the reason i ask rather than check in game is that most time i cant tell any differnt, so im just wondering if im doin it wrong or not using the best settings, do you notice a big diff wen using aa in skyrim as to other games
User avatar
Paula Ramos
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 5:45 pm

i use http://mrhaandi.blogspot.com/p/injectsmaa.html
User avatar
james kite
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 8:52 am

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 11:02 am

i use http://mrhaandi.blogspot.com/p/injectsmaa.html

yeah i
i use http://mrhaandi.blogspot.com/p/injectsmaa.html

think thats nvidia isnt it? ati and nvidia use diff version i think, do you see a noticible difference with it on or off??
User avatar
Rachel Cafferty
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:48 am

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 11:43 am

SMAA isn't compatible with Skyrim, it makes it's all bright. FXAA and SMAA cause a lot of texture shimmering. it's really down to what GPU you have, supersample if your GPU can take it and you like the quality, since there is really not better AA method and SGSSAA is a hit and miss affair.
User avatar
Amie Mccubbing
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 11:33 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 11:44 am

SMAA isn't compatible with Skyrim, it makes it's all bright.

works absolutely fine with me.

i dont know how it fairs with ati, but it works great on my AMD Radeon HD 6970 2GB with the AMD Catalyst 12.2 Preview Drivers. ;)
User avatar
Chris Cross Cabaret Man
 
Posts: 3301
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:33 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 4:29 am

Strange, could be some NVIDIA issue then because it's like the gamma has been turned up twice as high for me when I tried it. :P
User avatar
Lady Shocka
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:59 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 7:25 am

think thats nvidia isnt it? ati and nvidia use diff version i think, do you see a noticible difference with it on or off??

I want to add, NVIDIA developed FXAA themselves...
I think SMAA was developed by a third party. Could be wrong there.
User avatar
dav
 
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:46 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 5:51 am

Yep, welcome to the world of even more AA modes to confuse everyone, FXAA, SMAA, MLAA.
User avatar
Astargoth Rockin' Design
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:51 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 1:01 pm

Yep, welcome to the world of even more AA modes to confuse everyone, FXAA, SMAA, MLAA.

yeah i dont get that at all, really confusing.
i just prefer smaa over fxaa because fxaa messes with the texture filtering...
User avatar
Emilie M
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:08 am

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 3:59 pm

hang on now im confused whats SMAA , i thought it was SSAA, super sampling aa, and adaptive and another one for ati, am i wrong?
User avatar
rheanna bruining
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:00 am

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 6:04 pm

yes.

smaa = http://www.iryoku.com/smaa/
User avatar
Isabella X
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:44 am

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 1:59 pm

For Skyrim and other games generally if it's supported, use MSAA and SSAA as it's the best quality, even more so as FXAA, SMAA are really equivalent to MSAA 4x. Some games use both because MSAA doesn't do a very good job in pure post processing, Battlefield 3 is a good example and why you can use both MSAA and FXAA and the fact that MSAA is supported in DX11 deferred rendering.
User avatar
Mackenzie
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:18 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 2:53 pm

MSAA *8 from the launcher with bTransparencyMultisampling=1 setting in the ini
User avatar
Jonny
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:04 am

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 6:43 pm

No because transparency mulitisampling is buggy in Skyrim, supersample is fine.
User avatar
Jose ordaz
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:14 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 1:39 pm

SMAA is the best AA I think when it comes to quality and performance. However, it is not compatible if you use the FXAA injector mod.

I also like FXAA. Does a really good job on foilage.

SSAA is very good quality but KILLS your performance. Not worth it.

MSAA (the AA in Skyrim) is OK, but imo it has too little effect for too much performance hit.
User avatar
Hazel Sian ogden
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:10 am

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 5:00 pm

It's all in the detail, FXAA and SMAA, LMAA tend to soften the image too much and don't do very well on distance objects, fences and wires. Supersample pretty much does everything pin sharp, SGSSAA does a better job on shaders so you don't get texture shimmering on the decal snow and such, hence why they cost GPU power so much.

As I remember, SSAA up scales and then downscale the image to achieve it's superior quality, pretty much what they do in game promo shots where the image looks so perfect. SSAA does that in real time on the GPU and why it's so costly in performance.
User avatar
Trent Theriot
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:37 am

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 1:10 pm

No because transparency mulitisampling is buggy in Skyrim, supersample is fine.

after figuring out how to do SSAA with skyrim with my 7970 crossfires, and having a test, your right SSAA is superior.

Seems you have to enhance the games AA not disable it otherwise it wont work at all with ATI/AMD. Enabling enhanced though the CCC, MSAA*4 in the launcher with the CCC AA type slider to SSAA = a more stable image than msaa*8 + transparency AA from the ini , foliage is highly stable

edit: changing AA amount on the launcher resets shadows to 4096, it wasn't SSAA doing it

8* adaptive MSAA or 4*SSAA and 8192 shadows seems to fix every shadow related issue in skyrim. foliage is also stable, the outdoors 8000 distance shadows are ultra stable and look like high def shadows, instead of a mass of flickering microblocks.

GPU shadow filtering FTW.
User avatar
Maya Maya
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:35 pm

Post » Wed May 30, 2012 6:02 am

MSAA is best of the 2 default options. 4x is a good compromise between quality and performance.

FXAA blurs the crap out of this game, I did not notice until I turned it off after having it on for 150 hours lol.
User avatar
N Only WhiTe girl
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:30 pm


Return to V - Skyrim