Regardless of whether or not the Bear of Markarth is factual, and I doubt it is, it doesn't at all show that the Empire is not so bad. Painting Ulfric in a bad light doesn't make the Empire not bad. The empire has been shown to not really care about Skyrim beyond what it can get from her. They do not have Skyrim's best interests at heart and do things that are just as awful. And if you're making your decision based on Jarls... the Empire's idea of the best Jarl of Riften is Maven Freaking Black-Briar. Come on.
Anyway, props for staying neutral. I personally side with the Stormcloaks, because despite some of the awful things Ulfric has done, in general he is right. Skyrim needs a high king who can put Skyrim's needs first. Torygg couldn't, Elisif won't be able to, because they are basically puppets of the Empire (no matter how nice they are/were). Maybe that king isn't Ulfric, but the Empire clearly has no idea how to govern Skyrim.
Anyway, props for staying neutral. I personally side with the Stormcloaks, because despite some of the awful things Ulfric has done, in general he is right. Skyrim needs a high king who can put Skyrim's needs first. Torygg couldn't, Elisif won't be able to, because they are basically puppets of the Empire (no matter how nice they are/were). Maybe that king isn't Ulfric, but the Empire clearly has no idea how to govern Skyrim.
How many of Skyrims civilians were killed just for being Nords? None.
How many Nords were forced into the Legion? None.
To say the Empire does not care about Skyrim is False. The Stormcloaks caused most of Skyrims current Problems, Including the Thalmor and the Forsworn.
