Why should forgive the empire?

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 7:44 pm

Regardless of whether or not the Bear of Markarth is factual, and I doubt it is, it doesn't at all show that the Empire is not so bad. Painting Ulfric in a bad light doesn't make the Empire not bad. The empire has been shown to not really care about Skyrim beyond what it can get from her. They do not have Skyrim's best interests at heart and do things that are just as awful. And if you're making your decision based on Jarls... the Empire's idea of the best Jarl of Riften is Maven Freaking Black-Briar. Come on.

Anyway, props for staying neutral. I personally side with the Stormcloaks, because despite some of the awful things Ulfric has done, in general he is right. Skyrim needs a high king who can put Skyrim's needs first. Torygg couldn't, Elisif won't be able to, because they are basically puppets of the Empire (no matter how nice they are/were). Maybe that king isn't Ulfric, but the Empire clearly has no idea how to govern Skyrim.
How many of Skyrims citys were taken in the Great war? None.
How many of Skyrims civilians were killed just for being Nords? None.
How many Nords were forced into the Legion? None.

To say the Empire does not care about Skyrim is False. The Stormcloaks caused most of Skyrims current Problems, Including the Thalmor and the Forsworn.
User avatar
Saul C
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:41 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 7:07 pm

How many of Skyrims citys were taken in the Great war? None.
How many of Skyrims civilians were killed just for being Nords? None.
How many Nords were forced into the Legion? None.

To say the Empire does not care about Skyrim is False. The Stormcloaks caused most of Skyrims current Problems, Including the Thalmor and the Forsworn.

None of the things you listed above disproves my statement that the Empire does not care for Skyrim. It's true that the soldiers weren't forced into battle. They willingly joined, including soldiers such as Ulfric and Legate Rikke, etc. They fought hard, and many were killed and tortured. And then the war ended, and their way of live was outlawed. Because the Empire really cares about them and their service.

The Thalmor captures Skyrim's citizens and tortures them, and the Empire does nothing and even sanctions it. The empire makes sure that a young, impressionable high king is chosen and then sends lots of advisers to steer him towards what is best for Cyrodiil. When he dies, they put his young wife in power and do the same thing. I am very interested to hear your theory on how the Stormcloaks went back in time and made the Thalmor a problem for Skyrim, though. As for the Forsworn, they were a problem before the Stormcloaks existed.

I supported the Empire at first, I joined them on my first character, I hated Ulfric, blah blah blah. But after playing through the game and seeing all of the evidence, this is the conclusion I have come to. If you want to come up with some evidence that I haven't seen that the Empire truly cares for Skyrim and its people, go for it, I'd be glad to be proven wrong. But at almost 300 hours of playtime, it's very scarce.
User avatar
Lexy Dick
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:15 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 9:33 pm

None of the things you listed above disproves my statement that the Empire does not care for Skyrim. It's true that the soldiers weren't forced into battle. They willingly joined, including soldiers such as Ulfric and Legate Rikke, etc. They fought hard, and many were killed and tortured. And then the war ended, and their way of live was outlawed. Because the Empire really cares about them and their service.

The Thalmor captures Skyrim's citizens and tortures them, and the Empire does nothing and even sanctions it. The empire makes sure that a young, impressionable high king is chosen and then sends lots of advisers to steer him towards what is best for Cyrodiil. When he dies, they put his young wife in power and do the same thing. I am very interested to hear your theory on how the Stormcloaks went back in time and made the Thalmor a problem for Skyrim, though. As for the Forsworn, they were a problem before the Stormcloaks existed.

I supported the Empire at first, I joined them on my first character, I hated Ulfric, blah blah blah. But after playing through the game and seeing all of the evidence, this is the conclusion I have come to. If you want to come up with some evidence that I haven't seen that the Empire truly cares for Skyrim and its people, go for it, I'd be glad to be proven wrong. But at almost 300 hours of playtime, it's very scarce.
The Banning of Talos? Talos the Founder of the Current Empire, The Nord who killed Bretons and his Kinsman with his Cyrodilic army at Sance tor and the Most revered of the Nine divines?
To say that the Nords way of life was outlawed is not the whole story. The Empires way of life was outlawed, But not enforced. That his until Ulfric and his "Stormcloaks" started to kick up a fuss and The Empire as well as the Thalmor had to get involved. Because of Ulfric, Nords are now being imprisoned by the Thalmor and the Empire cannot act unless They want to cause the Great war two, Which they don't, Not because it will Devestate Cyrodil(again) or Skyrim or even Hammerfell, But because it will Devestate the Empire and Indeed all of Tamriel. Countless unecessary lives will be lost. But the stormcloaks don't care about everyone else, They care about themselves and Skyrim alone. The rest of Tamriel can burn by the Thalmor for all they care.
User avatar
Joe Bonney
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:00 pm

Post » Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:05 am

Who was this innocent man? There was a thief that was slain but he was hardly innocent, in fact he probably would have been executed the next time he was caught stealing. The Empire didn't mean to kill you, your papers were lost, you weren't on the list and you were in the same cart as the leader of the rebels. Wrong place at the wrong time, while I don't really agree with the spineless Imperials, they're far better than the bigot Stormcloaks.

Why would he be executed for stealing? Whenever a player character is caught stealing, they just have to pay a fine, and have any stolen goods in their possession confiscated.
User avatar
Amber Ably
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:11 am

Why would he be executed for stealing? Whenever a player character is caught stealing, they just have to pay a fine, and have any stolen goods in their possession confiscated.
The player character is never sentenced to death even if he put an entire city to the sword, and the fine for murder is less than a good strong potion. I'd call it player lenience than canon
User avatar
STEVI INQUE
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:19 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 11:44 pm

While I was in Oblivion I supported the Empire, in this game, they can go to well Oblivion and rot.


*They accused me of a crime, no trial, just wanted to lop my head off. Then later General Tullus tells me, "Oh it was probably just a misunderstanding." Um, wanting me dead is not a misunderstanding a**hole.


*The Emperor is a moron. He refused to sign the Treaty before the Thalmor invaded the Imperial City. Then he ran off like a scared cat, then came back and then signed the same terms he rejected before hand.


*Giving up Talos. He founded the Empire and was the first Emperor. He threw not the religious beliefs away but the founding of the Empire away-history. Titus Mede would not be on the throne if it was not for Talos.


*Millions of Nords helped fight in the war and a lot lost their lives. They fought believing Talos was with them, they fought to preserve their beliefs, traditions, home; and and families. Only to have it stripped away from them because the Emperor is a coward. It like a slap in the face.


*The Blades have become ruthless savages bent on revenge more then logic.


*The Emperor is more worried about preserving Skyrim as apart of the Empire then worried about trying to pull a double cross on the Thalmor. OK, you signed the treaty and just F'ed you and your kingdom. Fix it by going behind the Thalmor's back and making em eat it.


At least the Redguards and Nords have enough backbone to stand up and say enough is enough.
User avatar
Glu Glu
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:39 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 2:57 pm

D'jinn does not pick sides in these matters. She cares mainly for what benefits her, be that working for the Imperials or for the Stormcloaks. However, D'jinn does not like that her head was almost chopped off for no good reason, or that the worship of Talos was outlawed. D'jinn asks, why not allow others to exercise their faith as they please? D'jinn feels that both sides are right in their own ways, and wrong in their own ways. But these things are not for D'jinn to decide. She simply focuses on her magic in the college. No politics there.
User avatar
Alisia Lisha
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:52 pm

Post » Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:51 am

The Banning of Talos? Talos the Founder of the Current Empire, The Nord who killed Bretons and his Kinsman with his Cyrodilic army at Sance tor and the Most revered of the Nine divines?
To say that the Nords way of life was outlawed is not the whole story. The Empires way of life was outlawed, But not enforced. That his until Ulfric and his "Stormcloaks" started to kick up a fuss and The Empire as well as the Thalmor had to get involved. Because of Ulfric, Nords are now being imprisoned by the Thalmor and the Empire cannot act unless They want to cause the Great war two, Which they don't, Not because it will Devestate Cyrodil(again) or Skyrim or even Hammerfell, But because it will Devestate the Empire and Indeed all of Tamriel. Countless unecessary lives will be lost. But the stormcloaks don't care about everyone else, They care about themselves and Skyrim alone. The rest of Tamriel can burn by the Thalmor for all they care.
That's not what the Thalmor embassador says. She complains that the war is impeding thalmor executors work of finding (,torturing and executing) Talos Worshipers. I wouldn't say that she is suspicious of supporting stormcloacks.
User avatar
Blessed DIVA
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:09 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 3:04 pm

That's not what the Thalmor embassador says. She complains that the war is impeding thalmor executors work of finding (,torturing and executing) Talos Worshipers. I wouldn't say that she is suspicious of supporting stormcloacks.
What I meant was the Thalmor would not even be in Skyrim if it were not for the Rebels.
User avatar
jaideep singh
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:45 pm

Post » Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:20 am

What I meant was the Thalmor would not even be in Skyrim if it were not for the Rebels.

The thalmor wouldn't be in any provinces if it were not for the WGC.
User avatar
djimi
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:44 am

Post » Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:27 am

The thalmor wouldn't be in any provinces if it were not for the WGC.
The Thalmor would be in Every province were it not for the Empire.
User avatar
Chantel Hopkin
 
Posts: 3533
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:41 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 6:00 pm

The Thalmor would be in Every province were it not for the Empire.

The Thalmor already are in every province because the Empire agreed to the WGC.
User avatar
Wane Peters
 
Posts: 3359
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:34 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 1:46 pm

I'm saying this as someone who doesn't care about the civil war. Not only did they try to execute prisoners without a trial, but due to their incompetence and their blood lust, an innocent man who had nothing to do with the rebellion ended up getting killed, and they almost killed me without getting the facts straight.

While leaving the keep....I've seen their torture room, with dead prisoners....I found that even more messed up.

And the general of the Legion was watching the whole thing. Why should I forgive a bunch of corrupt murderers? I honestly wish their was a way of taking out the legion without joining the stormcloaks, since I'm not interested in the war.


soo... the innocent man was a thieve.

tullius didn't even know who you are. since you was there, he was sure that you belong to the stormcloaks. remember? only this female officer wanted you dead.

and this torturing guy was obviously a little bit sick.

stormcloaks don't torture and execute, because they are too busy calling every non-nord milkdrinker. they kill first and ask questions second. not better at all.
User avatar
john page
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:52 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 1:41 pm

If you go with the imperial at the start, he tries to talk to the stormcloaks and get away from the town peacefully... but they attack. That's 2 stormcloaks that tried to kill you, and 1 imperial that tried to kill you.
Yes, after he sent them to be executed. I'd attack him too if I were in their shoes. You, on the other hand, were completely innocent and about to be executed merely for convenience on their part.

Who was this innocent man? There was a thief that was slain but he was hardly innocent, in fact he probably would have been executed the next time he was caught stealing. The Empire didn't mean to kill you, your papers were lost, you weren't on the list and you were in the same cart as the leader of the rebels. Wrong place at the wrong time, while I don't really agree with the spineless Imperials, they're far better than the bigot Stormcloaks.
Assuming he would have done it again and simply executing him to save time doesn't sound very "just" to me. And the Empire did mean to kill you. You weren't with the leader of the rebellion when you were caught. You were simply rounded up by the same people who ambushed the rebels. Wrong place at the wrong time? Hardly. It'd be like the US grouping illegal immigrants with terrorists and executing them all at once.

In a war, if you are found in the same party as enemy number one when he gets caught, are they gonna be friendly?
You weren't caught with them. If you were, they wouldn't have had to explain that they were ambushed -- you already would have known.
User avatar
Amanda savory
 
Posts: 3332
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:37 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 7:10 pm

I respect what the Stormcloaks are trying to do, but it is short sighted. They are not seeing the bigger picture. The Thalmor absolutely wasted the Empire in the war. The Empire is all the kingdoms united. How the hell could just Skyrim stand up to them? Answer is they can't. If the Empire couldn't do it, how the hell is Skyrim going to do it? Ulfric has allowed his emotions and passion to overrule his judgement. The Empire had to surrender to live to fight another day. They hate the Thalmor just as much as Ulfric and his Stormcloaks. The worshiping of Talos was still going on all through out the Empire, until Ulfric started making noise and brought the worshiping of Talos under a Thalmor magnifying glass. Then the Empire had no choice but to enforce the outlawing of such worshiping. Notice however that the statue of Talos still stands in Whiterun. The Yarl there is a Empire supporter and they are still worshiping Talos.
Skyrim belongs to the Nords. If they want to fight the Thalmor on their own, why not let them? Because the Empire needs them? Yeah, that's not a justification for anything. The Empire stripped the Nords of their religious freedom. They ignored their beliefs and customs, likely kill many other innocents for the sake of convenience, and wish to control the High King as though he were a puppet. They're clearly in the wrong, despite their intentions. Would you justify America taking control of, say, Japan in order to defeat China? Or vice versa?

As far as the Empire trying to execute you in the beginning of the game. Your identity was not known. You were on a wagon with the leader of the rebellion. The Empire HAD to assume you were with them. Wrong place wrong time.
The Empire put you on that wagon with the leader of the rebellion. They knew you had nothing to do with it, and the guy in the beginning thinks you're returning to Skyrim or just another foreigner. There isn't a single accusation of you being part of the rebellion. Not one, and yet you were to be executed with them.
User avatar
rebecca moody
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:01 pm

Post » Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:40 am

Skyrim belongs to the Nords. If they want to fight the Thalmor on their own, why not let them? Because the Empire needs them? Yeah, that's not a justification for anything. The Empire stripped the Nords of their religious freedom. They ignored their beliefs and customs, likely kill many other innocents for the sake of convenience, and wish to control the High King as though he were a puppet. They're clearly in the wrong, despite their intentions. Would you justify America taking control of, say, Japan in order to defeat China? Or vice versa?


The Empire put you on that wagon with the leader of the rebellion. They knew you had nothing to do with it, and the guy in the beginning thinks you're returning to Skyrim or just another foreigner. There isn't a single accusation of you being part of the rebellion. Not one, and yet you were to be executed with them.
If Skyrim belongs to the Nords, tell me whats going to happen to the other races that call Skyrim home? Kick them out or do the same thing the Thalmor did with its non-Altmer citizens which is kill them. As others have said Talos is the Imperial's god as well and the Nords ain't the only ones suffering due to the WGC. Killing innocents? When and where did the Legion slaughter innocents? The only one who is truly innocent in the beginning is you(which might change later in game), the rest deserved to be on the chopping block to ensure a quick end to the war.
User avatar
Assumptah George
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:43 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 6:23 pm

Kick them out or do the same thing the Thalmor did with its non-Altmer citizens which is kill them.
Where does it say the Thalmor killed all their non-Altmer citizens? - And define "their citizens". The thalmor is the ruling body of the Aldmeri Dominion. The Aldmeri dominion makes up Summerset isle (Altmer), valenwood (Bosmer) and former Elsweyr (Khajiit), given valenwood and Elsweyr are still full of Wood Elves and Khajiit respectively, it's apparent the Thalmor have not killed all the "non high Elf citizens"
User avatar
Eric Hayes
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:57 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 8:20 pm

It says that the thalmor killed all non altmer citizens in the summerset isles in the book called Rising threat vol. 4
User avatar
Laura Simmonds
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:27 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 3:50 pm

Where does it say the Thalmor killed all their non-Altmer citizens? - And define "their citizens". The thalmor is the ruling body of the Aldmeri Dominion. The Aldmeri dominion makes up Summerset isle (Altmer), valenwood (Bosmer) and former Elsweyr (Khajiit), given valenwood and Elsweyr are still full of Wood Elves and Khajiit respectively, it's apparent the Thalmor have not killed all the "non high Elf citizens"
http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Rising_Threat,_Vol._IV, I should have specify this was in Summerset Isle at first and the Thalmor killed any citizen without Aldmer blood and of course political dissidents as well.
User avatar
Nick Swan
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:34 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 9:01 pm

If Skyrim belongs to the Nords, tell me whats going to happen to the other races that call Skyrim home? Kick them out or do the same thing the Thalmor did with its non-Altmer citizens which is kill them. As others have said Talos is the Imperial's god as well and the Nords ain't the only ones suffering due to the WGC. Killing innocents? When and where did the Legion slaughter innocents? The only one who is truly innocent in the beginning is you(which might change later in game), the rest deserved to be on the chopping block to ensure a quick end to the war.
There are Dunmer refugees living inside Windhelm, which is under the control of Ulfric. And yes, killing innocents. If they were so quick to send you to the chopping block, what makes you think they haven't done the same elsewhere? Like I said earlier, Ulfric challenged High King Torygg to a duel and defeated him. He did not murder him, and yet the person who allowed him to flee Solitude was executed for allowing him to leave. I'd say he was innocent as well.
User avatar
Laura Samson
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:36 pm

Post » Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:19 am

The torture thing definitely bothers me. Is the Empire guilty of this on its own or by the orders of the Thalmor? Are the Stormcloaks caught doing this? Thalmor and torturers are two kinds of NPCs my character will assassinate at the first realistic opportunity. Otherwise he's pretty goody-goody. In fact when I ran into a torturer at the beginning of the game I immediately killed him and the people with me ignored it and it didn't count as murder. :thumbsup:
User avatar
R.I.p MOmmy
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:40 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 11:32 pm

The torture thing definitely bothers me. Is the Empire guilty of this on its own or by the orders of the Thalmor? Are the Stormcloaks caught doing this? Thalmor and torturers are two kinds of NPCs my character will assassinate at the first realistic opportunity. Otherwise he's pretty goody-goody. In fact when I ran into a torturer at the beginning of the game I immediately killed him and the people with me ignored it and it didn't count as murder. :thumbsup:

I haven't seen the Empire or the Stormcloaks torturing anyone, and I played through both questlines. But the fact that the Empire lets the Thalmor capture and torture Skyrim citizens and does nothing about it pisses me off. Not to mention the fact that they have the habit of just executing anyone they come across without any kind of due process. At least Ulfric consistently gives his opponents a choice. He challenges Torygg to a duel, Torygg could have backed out but didn't. He asked Jarl Balgruuf to make a choice, Balgruuf could have sided with him but he didn't (and though Galmar Stone-fist said that Ulfric should kill him, Ulfric didn't want to). Even at the end, in Solitude, he gives Legate Rikke the option to leave because he knows that she is honorable and fight with him in the war, though she would rather fight to the death. And finally, he gives Elisif the option of staying Jarl of Solitude and swearing fealty to him, which she does.

I'm not saying all of these choices are great. It really svcks to have to choose between dying and possibly being forced to abdicate your throne. But at least there's a choice. The Empire doesn't tend to grant that courtesy.
User avatar
Carlitos Avila
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:05 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 5:54 pm

Really? Cause when it comes to being bigoted, I noticed the nord in that book admires the dunmer of Riften for actually doing work and assimilating into the nord's city.

Whereas in that other book, the dunmer calls all nords cattle waiting to be slaughtered by their true masters, the elves.

What, he was just being honest.

But seriously, that's just that one guy. The owner of the New Ginis Corner Club has stated that he has tried to appeal to Ulfric personally, but his holiness could not be bothered. Do you hear or see any Dunmer in Windhelm doing anything but trying to make an honest living? No. One bigoted Dunmer doesn't justify hundreds of bigoted Nords. I can only think of one Nordic Dunmer sympathizer, but even he is dismissed by Ulfric.
User avatar
Kevin S
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:50 pm

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim