No, I'm claiming if you have the perks and the ebony mail, heavy armor is better for sneaking. Its inconvenient to sacrifice the 20% bonus, but it doesn't affect the game that much, you also get +100 carry capacity.
see now you are just being stuborn.... the simple debate is wich is better for sneaking... and light armor is the clear winner, BECAUSE it doesnt need a special stone or perks to work well with.
its not just incovinient to sacrifice a stone, its plainly BAD, it means that you wont be leveling as fast or worse, wont be having acess to neat offencive and defencive powers that other stones provide.
and its plainly and directly flatout BAD to use heavy armor BECAUSE you need to skill it to 70, AND perk it to be weightless to work anywhere near as good as using light armor, while light armor doesnt require any perks or leveling at all....
not to mention a sneak based char wont be hit very often and thus level slowly their armor skill, unless ofc, "artificially" leveled.
If you got the ebony mail early on, you would be able to do backstabs with heavy armor even without the perk. The effect isn't muffle, its some sort of sneak bonus.
no, you wont, I dont think you know what muffle is... and BOTH gale boots (light thieves guild special armor) and ebony mail (daedric quest heavy armor) have muffle effect -> fact
also you are NOT going to get that armor piece early on as its a daedric quest, and even if you somehow DO, it poisons nearby people so you CANT backstab with it.
Also remember he wants to be a warrior as well, heavy armor is stronger, looks better IMO and is more useful for companions.
not going to argue there, its flatout more protection, and looks, is a matter of taste really.
but its also important to note that IF perked and leveled BOTH armors have the same defence potential, while light armor has stamina regen perk.
but in terms of raw protection, especially while elveling, for direct melee combat heavy armor is best.
but NOT for sneak.
Not sure why I'm arguing for heavy armor, as I use light armor ha, also my next character after 1.3 will have no armor. But if you have the perks, sneaking in heavy armor will be better.
why are you so stubornly saying this... how is it better?
the sneak bonuses are the same... light armor can have backstab bonus while heavy cannot, heavy armor requires twice or more skill and perk points to get as good as light armor is naturally...
how is it better?
You don't need x30 sneak damage with daggers, as the weapons you get with heavy armor through smithing, are stronger than the light armor counterpart. Also most good unique weapons come under the heavy side of the smithing tree, most unique shields are heavy as well, useful for a warrior.
LOL
you have no idea what you are saying... base damage value between a daedric dagger and a glass dagger is neglectible when applied to the huge backstab multipliers...
also nothing prevents you from using daedric daggers if you are using light armor... if you cant craft them they are less acessible, but very much so, still attainable
the sneak bonus is BIG and you DO need it, especially in master difficulty.