Skyrim's successor

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:37 pm

I have read many times that bethesda spend most of the time that they had available in the detail and graphics of the game, that is why so many other features were left unfinished. I recently started learning about euclideons unlimited detail and started to wonder, what if bethesda did not have to worry about the graphics, what else could they add or rather what else could they improve in their games that have always been left out do to graphics restrains. If they didn't have to worry about the graphics than i think that they should focus on the AI and how it reacts toward you, what about you guys, what do you think that bethesda should improve if they didn't have to worry about the graphics.
User avatar
Lady Shocka
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:59 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:01 am

I personally don't trust that unlimited detail thing. It just seems too much like a hoax to me.
User avatar
YO MAma
 
Posts: 3321
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:24 am

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:09 am

i would rather they put equal parts in everything tbh, the time they spent on gfx and the world is all great and everything but i would like equal parts devoted to story and other fun mechanics that could (should) have gone into the game
User avatar
Queen
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:00 pm

Post » Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:01 am

If you wish to discuss future games please use http://www.gamesas.com/topic/1311878-official-beyond-skyrim-tes-vi-4/.
User avatar
lucile davignon
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:40 pm


Return to V - Skyrim