First off he might actually mean Dual casting like say the same as dual wielding, ie casting a spell in each hand. Secondly its a 20% boost in damage over simply casting a spell in each hand.(and if you have a lot of cost reducers the extra magicka cost is slim to nothing.) You at least remembered the main point of dual casting is to take advantage of the impact perk.
If you plan on using destruction as an offensive weapon you take dual casting and impact period. If your just trying to level destruction then you can just cast a spell in each hand which is probably what he's asking.
Firstly, if he was just trying to level it, the point still stands in that taking DC is not a terribly good idea since it eats magic. Could just do as you said and just spam Flames or something on someone essential and it's cost less magicka. As for the actual usefulness of Dual Casting, while magicka regen and Fortify Destruction stuff does factor in, unless you're covered in six pieces of Fortify Destruction/Improve Magicka Regen stuff that's maxed out, it's usually not so beneficial to dual cast Destruction past the lower levels unless you're REALLY into Destruction. Which is totes fine if you are, just strikes me as a bit bland once you get past the initial jolt of setting everything on fire.
This actually.
Impact is SO powerful of a tool to have for such a small investment. I have it for my nightblade. Whenever I need a stun-lock, I put away the sword and I throw some dual-impacts. They take so long to recover I can pull the blade and finish.
What I am saying is just the occasional use is worth the perk, just having a stun-lock ability at a moments notice is very powerful.
You could also just use Ice Form shout, then they're frozen solid and even if you attack and break them free, they take a while to get back up.
