New Vegas: The Real Fo3?

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:52 am

So there's been a bit going around where people, like myself, think that FoNV will be the true Fo3. So I just wanted to know what you think about it all. This is being developed by some of the main people that started on VB. This looks like A new and improved Van Buren to me.

Just want to know what the public thinks.
User avatar
Natasha Biss
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:47 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:40 pm

This thread just REEKS of 'elitism' over just accepting what the Actual canon is. :facepalm:

Edit-fixed so I dont get yelled at for saying 'fanboyism'
User avatar
Alan Whiston
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:07 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 1:42 pm

I think Fallout 3 can be Fallout 3, It takes place on the East coast of the United States so it can do its own separate thing.

Now I do think New Vegas would technically be more of sequel considering its continuing what was going on in Fallout 1/2 and its one the West coast so they can bring over a lot of stuff from the older games.
User avatar
IM NOT EASY
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:41 am

Fallout 3 is Fallout 3, and nothing will change that.
User avatar
Hannah Whitlock
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:21 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:09 pm

I'm not saying Fo3 isn't cannon, I'm just saying Fo3 didn't really go with the stories from the other 2. It was a reboot of the series, but I'm just wondering what people think is a true-er sequel. I liked loved Fo3. To be honest it's what got me started. I'm just saying this looks more like a Fo3.
User avatar
Project
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:30 am

This doesn't seem like a constructive discussion.
User avatar
Emmie Cate
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:01 am


Return to Fallout: New Vegas