If Bethesda delayed the PC version... : V

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:16 am

If Bethesda delayed the PC version, to bring it up to current hardware level ie full quad core support, full DX11 features, SLi and Xfire support out of the box etc... would you mind?

Personally I wouldn't be bothered much, if it makes the game better for your platform then I say go for it.

Thoughts?

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:07 pm

Add PC unique UI into that mix and 64 bit support

Not at all i would LOVE IT

But ya thats me...

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:29 pm

I wouldn't mind, as long as it's not like super long. Although with all the people on the forum talking about the PS3/360 version it be kind of hard.

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:41 am

Would give me more time to get everything ready for my mod

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:51 pm

Then I'd ask: Why not patch it in? Seriously, they'd only lose money that way, by people migrating to consoles to play earlier.

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:12 pm

If Bethesda delayed the PC version, to bring it up to current hardware level ie full quad core support, full DX11 features, SLi and Xfire support out of the box etc... would you mind?

Personally I wouldn't be bothered much, if it makes the game better for your platform then I say go for it.

Thoughts?

Well, i think i would mind

Considering i have a Dual core and a single dx10.1 compatible video card.. so i wont be able to reap the benefits anytime soon.. :wink_smile: But for all those who don't mind: Aww heck.. what's waiting a few weeks/month longer after waiting the previous months? (i guess an eternity for some

)

Edit: typo's

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:37 am

11/11/11 is the set release and pete said that they're happy where they are with the game considering it's only 1 month and 20 days away. PC will have patches, possibly in the first week of it's release.

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:11 am

I would spray my brains all over the wall if I had to wait longer than 11/11/11.

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:04 am

I'd like it a lot. It would make the game look not so outdated already.

However, we all know something like that would never, ever happen.

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:42 pm

If Bethesda delayed the PC version, to bring it up to current hardware level ie full quad core support, full DX11 features, SLi and Xfire support out of the box etc... would you mind?

Personally I wouldn't be bothered much, if it makes the game better for your platform then I say go for it.

Thoughts?

I would GLADLY wait a while for a more refined version of the game. But they can always patch it to do that... not that I expect them to.

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:04 am

I'd like it a lot. It would make the game look not so outdated already.

Wow, what are you playing right now that makes Skyrim look outdated? :blink:

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:04 pm

Wow, what are you playing right now that makes Skyrim look outdated? :blink:

He plays too much Crysis.

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:12 pm

Id' be quite happy if it was a proper PC port. I don't mind waiting, I have other things to do after all.

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:50 pm

or witcher 2 or Lord of the Rings online even..

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:06 am

Then I'd ask: Why not patch it in? Seriously, they'd only lose money that way, by people migrating to consoles to play earlier.

Yup, use the internet to update it. Cmon it's the future after all.

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:22 pm

If Bethesda delayed the PC version, to bring it up to current hardware level ie full quad core support, full DX11 features, SLi and Xfire support out of the box etc... would you mind?

Thoughts?

As someone who just built a new gaming PC, so that I can run stuff at higher quality?

Yeah, I'd be annoyed by that. I'm fine with how Skyrim is shaping up.

:shrug:

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:30 pm

I'd wait a month for DX 11, tessellation and that kinda thing, yeah. No more than that though.

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:12 am

If Bethesda delayed the PC version, to bring it up to current hardware level ie full quad core support, full DX11 features, SLi and Xfire support out of the box etc... would you mind?

Personally I wouldn't be bothered much, if it makes the game better for your platform then I say go for it.

Thoughts?

I don't think full DX11 features are needed, SLI/CF optimization usually comes about quick enough through driver optimization and if Bethesda can code for the 360's tri-core and the PS3's multiple cells, but can't plan to manage utilizing more than two cores of a PC's CPU... then that's just epic fail in 2011.

Would like to see a 64bit .exe, which is something that can be offered after as well.

I'd accept a delay for including Spell Making though.

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:00 am

Full blown DX11 support (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uavLefzDuQ is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ABeq7PEdRc&feature=fvwrel) could be patched in later, as could a 64 bit .exe, but if waiting for the game were the only way to get tessellation, I'd gladly wait. Hopefully, Skyrim eventually gets all of the above with patches and we'll not have to wait.

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:54 am

well since my gaming rig wont be built by then and ill end up getting it on the 360 till i can get it built it wouldnt bother me... in fact it would be more incentive to get it built :woot:

» Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:16 pm

Make it a patch. I'd rather wait to get more content for the game.

» Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:43 am

I seriously doubt there will be even a 64bit exe or any real graphics update coming from bethesda. They want (and are payed by M$) to deliver a game that looks just about the same on console as on PC. The "experience" has to be the same you know.