Get someone to sign a contract whereby a person agrees to be your slave. Yes, they signed away their rights in a mutually agreed upon contractual obligation. The court will then nullify it because it is ILLEGAL. It was made illegal because it is WRONG. Just like a EULA is.
The EULA should not be signing away our rights WHILE GRANTING video game publishers the right to sell us products that are BROKEN, INCOMPLETE, AND DECEPTIVELY MARKETED.
Unfortunately for EA, this whole Crysis 2 fiasco is about to bite them in the ass.
There is a legitimate claim for a class action lawsuit against EA.
After months of promoting the game and demonstrating it as a DirectX11 title, these flaunted features were "silently" removed from the game, with no explanation or confirmation to consumers whatsoever.
These advertised features that were promoted for years/months within the gaming community, and the resulting silent removal, therefore has resulted in fraudulent advertising and promotion of a product.
Let's not even mention the plentiful amount of broken features in the game such as Multiplayer, Limited Edition Download Content, etc. etc. Or shall we?
Unfortunately for EA, despite the fact that DirectX 11 support isn't explicitly stated on the box, convincing a judge in a public trial that PC customers were not being led to believe that the said platform was going to be supported is going to be one hell of a struggle given the reputation that the Crysis brand name is built on and the MONTHS of VAST AMOUNTS of evidence that can be freely found on the internet and various other media publications.
It's time to set the wheel in motion, if this class action lawsuit is successful - We might be entitled to full refunds of our purchase, but there's something greater at stake... The full-blown exposure of the video game industry's greed and corruption, and the potential to never see another blatant console port again.
If you know of any lawyers, please share the details of this situation with them. Please share this on other forums. EA's negligence is so utterly blatant and arrogant. This is a case that even a green straight out of law school could win.
This isn't about money. $60 is worth far less than the end of EULAs that allow greedy global corporate entities to engage in blatantly anti-consumer activities for their own gain.
The way CryTek has been responding, no doubt by order of EA, has just left such a sour taste in my mouth.
Have you played Crysis 2?
It's incomplete and broken in so many different ways.
The fact that EA had the BALLs to release a game in this condition just goes to show how arrogant they are and how they don't give a damn about the consumers that put money in their coffers. It's disgusting, really.