I just have to say I think the ending of Crysis 2 was extremely weak compared to the ending of Crysis 1. I mean In Crysis 1's ending the military nuked the island, which led to a suprise attack by the aliens, you get the TAC cannon and have to fight that giant 4 legged Hunter, and THEN you still have a giant alien warship to destroy before it crashes into the aircraft carrier. Not to mention how visually stunning it was, with the tracers flying through the air and the thousands of aliens flying overhead. Then in Crysis 2 we get a dumbed down version of central park, floating above the city in little chunks (no doubt because the consoles couldn't render the massive scope of central park and the number of trees). Then we fight some normal aliens and a few small cloaked aliens that have ridiculous health for some reason before entering the alien structure, which somehow causes a magic cloud that evaporates all the aliens in New York within seconds. Then we get the whole "we won the battle, but the war's not over". Give me a break. I don't know whether it was richard morgan or EA but crysis 2's story was a joke. I'll still play crysis 2's multiplayer since it's decent and I'll install the dx11 patch, but I doubt I'll ever buy another crytek game again.

C1's ending was cool, but I prefer the cliffhanger of C2's ending; I like how it doesn't reveal anything useful

C1's ending was cool, but I prefer the cliffhanger of C2's ending; I like how it doesn't reveal anything useful

I like how the eintire game doesnt reveal anything usefull lol.

Far Cry was cryteks best game ever!
No crysis can reach up to that playability that FC had big maps not linear, i played it several times all in different ways.
Crysis was also good in thos ways to play, Crysis 2 was good and fun so game was worth the money in single mode only, BUT to linear.

Far Cry was cryteks best game ever!
No crysis can reach up to that playability that FC had big maps not linear, i played it several times all in different ways.
Crysis was also good in thos ways to play, Crysis 2 was good and fun so game was worth the money in single mode only, BUT to linear.
If you really care about an open world I can only say one thing... play S.T.A.L.K.E.R, it destroys ANYTHING that Crytek has ever made

Wow... Search th forums dude... There are over 9000 topics on this

Far Cry was cryteks best game ever!
No crysis can reach up to that playability that FC had big maps not linear, i played it several times all in different ways.
Crysis was also good in thos ways to play, Crysis 2 was good and fun so game was worth the money in single mode only, BUT to linear.
If you really care about an open world I can only say one thing... play S.T.A.L.K.E.R, it destroys ANYTHING that Crytek has ever made


Im on metro now , but i recently bought the whole stalker serie;-)

Im on metro now , but i recently bought the whole stalker serie;-)
They're completely different games but they both have the Russian/Eastern European atmosphere
Metro isn't free roaming but Stalker is

I love Crysis 1 ending, because it is more dramatic... Crysis 2 ending is good, but still, Crysis 1 has a better ending!

STALKER is an RPG, you cant compare that to FC or Crysis. in matter of fact, would FC2 be an RPG?

STALKER is an RPG, you cant compare that to FC or Crysis. in matter of fact, would FC2 be an RPG?
Dude Stalker is NOT an RPG, it's FPS with some RPG elements, but mainly FPS

C1's ending was cool, but I prefer the cliffhanger of C2's ending; I like how it doesn't reveal anything useful

They probably did it so that they'll make a "Crysis 3"... Then they'll actually have some kind of real story to the game, while just making sixty extra bucks off of us poor svckers.

Don't get me wrong though, I love the ending of C1, but I also like the ending of C2, a "real cliffhanger"...