Give me one good reason why the emprie is better : V

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:37 am

does anyone realize bethesda tried to tell us that the stormcloaks were the good guys????

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:22 pm

No... They try to tell us there are no good or bad guys in this war. Only opinions.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:03 pm

Did you really make another thread?

Bethesda wouldn't make one side correct. They never do. War never has a correct side. You're just a really really really really really devoted Stormcloak supporter.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 11:33 am

*Laughs on the floor nearly breaking his head*

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:59 pm

No... They try to tell us there are no good or bad guys in this war. Only opinions.

that is a good point, but based on the beginning of the game, they implemented that the stormcloaks are good, lets face it

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:04 pm

Wow, spam much?

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 9:54 am

There are no good or bad guys in this war.

I will explain why I side with the empire.

The stormcloak jarls in my opinion are incomptent compared to imperial ones(The winterhold jarl wants to drive out the mages college and we will need mages for the war with the thalmor and after the college quest I think the college will hate the thalmor)

Economic issues if stormcloaks win.

Replacement of troops after the civil war.

An alliance with hammerfell is too much of a wild card and I doubt two provinces will be able to crush the thalmor completely. When hammerfell only stale mated with the help with imperial legion veterans who "deserted".

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:18 pm

Dude, I liked your "the stormcloaks are babies" thing, but please - there are like, 20 other threads about why one side is better than the other... no offense, really, but also... really? Also, your typo in your title - I mean, c'mon...

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:58 pm

*Laughs on the floor nearly breaking his head*

gonna tell us why buddy

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 11:25 pm

Because its supporters don't make pointless, antagonizing threads that make assertions with no evidence to back them up?

Sounds like a good reason to me.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:10 am

Because its supporters don't make pointless, antagonizing threads that make assertions with no evidence to back them up?

Sounds like a good reason to me. :tongue:

Definitely this.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:31 pm

Dude, I liked your "the stormcloaks are babies" thing, but please - there are like, 20 other threads about why one side is better than the other... no offense, really, but also... really? Also, your typo in your title - I mean, c'mon...

alright it's 10 at night here in ohio and im just having fun with my buddy, who apparently is a legionnaire!!!!

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:09 pm

There are no good or bad guys in this war.

I will explain why I side with the empire.

The stormcloak jarls in my opinion are incomptent compared to imperial ones(The winterhold jarl wants to drive out the mages college and we will need mages for the war with the thalmor and after the college quest I think the college will hate the thalmor)

Economic issues if stormcloaks win.

Replacement of troops after the civil war.

An alliance with hammerfell is too much of a wild card and I doubt two provinces will be able to crush the thalmor completely. When hammerfell only stale mated with the help with imperial legion veterans who "deserted".

I would rather say the Imperial Jarls are more competent. Most of them doesn't seem all that intelligent either.

OP; there is already more than one thread about the Skyrim Civil War and this forum doesn't allow duplicate threads of the same topic. This one if basicly the same as you other one and this is an argument you could have brought up there instead of possibly provoking the Moderators.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:44 am

You HAD to start the same thread on this area as well. I'll restat.

The Empire loses so do you. Get over yourselves. Thalmor win=Unmaking of Mundus=No petty rebellion much less people

Besides BOTH sides are equally bad when you start comparing things, that means no biased thoughts. But that isn't fair apparently cause both sides are better than each other because Xperson said so.

BOTH sides have their good points, BOTH sides have their bad points. Its all biased personal opinions. I'm sure the Devs made both equally good and bad.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 11:18 am

gonna tell us why buddy

How absurd and biased your posts are.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:10 pm

don't feed the troll

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 5:38 pm

You HAD to start the same thread on this area as well. I'll restat.

The Empire loses so do you. Get over yourselves. Thalmor win=Unmaking of Mundus=No petty rebellion much less people

Besides BOTH sides are equally bad when you start comparing things, that means no biased thoughts. But that isn't fair apparently cause both sides are better than each other because Xperson said so.

BOTH sides have their good points, BOTH sides have their bad points. Its all biased personal opinions. I'm sure the Devs made both equally good and bad.

look i get what your saying, if the thalmor win, were gonna out of the butt and into the [censored]!!!!!

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:05 pm

I don't think this guy can be convinced of anything.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 5:52 pm

that is a good point, but based on the beginning of the game, they implemented that the stormcloaks are good, lets face it

And let's face it, when you keep on playing, you'll discover that they weren't all that good after all. And the Empire wasn't completely evil. Why do you think people have a hard time choosing between them? Why do you think threads like these exists?

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 5:20 pm

I would rather say the Imperial Jarls are more competent. Most of them doesn't seem all that intelligent either.

OP; there is already more than one thread about the Skyrim Civil War and this forum doesn't allow duplicate threads of the same topic. This one if basicly the same as you other one and this is an argument you could have brought up there instead of possibly provoking the Moderators.

Yup when I did the stormcloak side I was facepalming at the stormcloak jarls. The riften one is so stupid/ignorant its disgusting and the winterhold one is just ugh. With maven in charge I understand she is corrupt but the thieves guild services can be used in the war. Stealing battle plans from the enemy? Sabotaging equipment? Stuff like that.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:54 pm

Nope. This seems to be a spam thread.

@Seranolover: You hear but you don't listen.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:46 pm

guys im just having fun, listening to your opinions, is that SO BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 5:20 pm

Yup when I did the stormcloak side I was facepalming at the stormcloak jarls. The riften one is so stupid/ignorant its disgusting and the winterhold one is just ugh. With maven in charge I understand she is corrupt but the thieves guild services can be used in the war. Stealing battle plans from the enemy? Sabotaging equipment? Stuff like that.

Personally I would say there are two competent Jarls in Skyrim: Balgruuf and Vignar, both in control over Whiterun and of them I think Balgruuf is the better one. How competent Ulfric is can be argued, so I won't include him here.

guys im just having fun, listening to your opinions, is that SO BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No, but spamming threads make the Moderators angry, which can be bad for you.

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:45 pm

I don't think this guy can be convinced of anything.

you got that right

» Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:53 am

you got that right

That also includes common sense.