So we got the new patch...

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:24 am

Now we are just awaiting new drivers and a 64 exe correct? Just out of curiosity, what does the 64 exe do? Also, is there any definitive knowledge and not rumors on a texture pack?
User avatar
WYatt REed
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:06 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 5:57 am

The 64-bit exe is the one the developers used which should include some form of "idStudio", so basically what was used to create the game. As far as what normal people are actually going to be able to mod without the resources of an entire studio, it might be somewhat limited just in terms of what is reasonable to do.
User avatar
Kelly Upshall
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:26 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:54 am

the 64bit exe will actually help allot to improve performance and make better use of 4GB+ ram and multi-threading. The overall game performance should really benefit of running in "native"x64 it's not about the Tools/Editor at all I don't care about that at all tbh. All i want is a more stable game and imho x64 can help @ that department

I'm not really enjoying my RAGE Anarchy "hard copy" edition at the moment as It's simply unplayable even after the new patch and "AMD 11.10 Battlefield3/Rage v2 preview" drivers (still have to mod the drivers myself)
User avatar
Naomi Ward
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:37 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:31 pm

the 64bit exe will actually help allot to improve performance and make better use of 4GB+ ram and multi-threading. The overall game performance should really benefit of running in "native"x64 it's not about the Tools/Editor at all I don't care about that at all tbh. All i want is a more stable game and imho x64 can help @ that department

I'm not really enjoying my RAGE Anarchy "hard copy" edition at the moment as It's simply unplayable even after the new patch and "AMD 11.10 Battlefield3/Rage v2 preview" drivers (still have to mod the drivers myself)



Try this helps you maybe too.http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1239310-ati-hd-4980-or-4xxx-and-intel-core2duo-c2d-fix/
User avatar
chinadoll
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:09 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 1:08 am

patch didnt do squat.. still have tearing and poping in areas
User avatar
LijLuva
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:59 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 8:04 am

patch didn't fix my ugly textures. the only thing i want is textures that at least look like they're not from 1999. i mean... doom 3 looks 10 times better... heres even http://i.imgur.com/UoJ0r.jpg for you
User avatar
Nicola
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:57 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:49 am

patch didn't fix my ugly textures. the only thing i want is textures that at least look like they're not from 1999. i mean... doom 3 looks 10 times better... heres even http://i.imgur.com/UoJ0r.jpg for you

I agree with you on that. It is like it is half beautiful and half dog sh*t ugly. The skies look amazing... maybe I should just play the game looking up.
User avatar
katsomaya Sanchez
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:03 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 2:15 am

patch didn't fix my ugly textures. the only thing i want is textures that at least look like they're not from 1999. i mean... doom 3 looks 10 times better... heres even http://i.imgur.com/UoJ0r.jpg for you

lol true that.

I think they screwed them up with they compressed them.

They really need to address this.
User avatar
Kayla Oatney
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:02 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 6:52 am

Are the PS3 and 360 graphics like that too or is it just PC?
User avatar
John Moore
 
Posts: 3294
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:18 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 7:31 pm

think its just pc, lets have a http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI3FuL27mho

edit: seems to me they look just about as bad on the consoles, but maybe just a little bit better.
User avatar
Rude Gurl
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:17 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 4:08 pm

think its just pc, lets have a http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI3FuL27mho

edit: seems to me they look just about as bad on the consoles, but maybe just a little bit better.

looks just a touch better on consoles texture-wise.

can't believe a piece of crap 200 dollar noob-box looks slightly better than my pc. I mean my graphics card alone cost me 630. lol... fail.
User avatar
C.L.U.T.C.H
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:23 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 1:03 am

looks just a touch better on consoles texture-wise.

can't believe a piece of crap 200 dollar noob-box looks slightly better than my pc. I mean my graphics card alone cost me 630. lol... fail.

Heh, yep they def didn't give the PC gamers what we paid for.
User avatar
Elena Alina
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:24 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 9:41 pm

they inevitably knew that the textures were so fukt up when they released the game, i wonder why they didn't just delay the game an extra month and use some less destructive compression method...
User avatar
benjamin corsini
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:32 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 1:56 am

they inevitably knew that the textures were so fukt up when they released the game, i wonder why they didn't just delay the game an extra month and use some less destructive compression method...

That's the billion dollar question my friend.

It's what happens when developers get lazy and try console porting instead of optimizing the game for pc.

This is a classic case console porting at its finest.
User avatar
Czar Kahchi
 
Posts: 3306
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:56 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 11:37 pm

Yea textures look like [censored]. thats my only problem. Ugly as hell! I want some sixiniess when I look at a damn wall.
User avatar
Joanne
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 11:02 pm

They should just let the texture packs "leak" into the community so I can just torrent it.
User avatar
Alexandra Louise Taylor
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:48 pm


Return to Othor Games