» Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:21 am
X360 fanboy reads somewhere that the PS3 version's framerate dips more often than the 360 version's (it's a fact, but the drops are within like 3-5 fps, and anyone who's actually played the PS3 version knows it isn't noticeable), comes on here, starts this thread. Obvious troll is obvious. Yawn.
Believe me, I'm not an Xbox 360 fan. Literally every person I know who wins a 360 has had it dies at least once from RROD, I wouldn't dream of buying one. And from what I hear, the 360 version of Crysis 2 is basically just as bad as the PS3 in the graphics/framerate department (or with negligible differences). The problem is that Crysis 2 code is jsut porrly written for consoles. It's really sad, beause if they had this game optimized and running smooth on consoles, it would be a devastating COD killer, easily. Honestly, even if they could get it at a smooth 30 fps, it would still be the best first person shooter in the last ten yeas (maybe even better than COD4). Basically Crysis 2 is a damn good, amazing game, which is almost ruined and unplayable due to poor coding and low framerate. The game can still be fun, but it does not run smooth at all. Some maps are better than otehrs of course, and the really bad ones are literally so bad I can't play on them. I don't think Crytek can fix this problem, but I suspect Crysis 3 will be a groundbreaking COD killer it they get it sorted out by then.