An idea on why Bethesda signed the Exclusivity Deal...

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:58 am

Does anyone remember that "interview" last year where Todd Howard and Notch from Minecraft sat down and talked about each other's games? Notch mentioned getting grief from Microsoft about Kinect, and You could see in Todd's face that Bethesda had too.

It might be possible that Bethesda talked Microsoft down from pushing Kinect into Skyrim at launch by agreeing to making the first two DLCs Xbox exclusive for a period of time.

Obviously there's holes with this idea, and there's no way, short of Todd himself revealing it, to tell if this was the case, but an idea, nonetheless.

As a side note, I'm hoping that Beth take a nice long time to make their next DLC smooth and creamy for all three platforms. Maybe get Dawnguard out on PS3, too.
User avatar
Flutterby
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:28 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:56 pm

Offered money, Sony would have done the same....
User avatar
Stephanie Valentine
 
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:09 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:07 am

why should sony waste millions just for 30 days?
i dont get this exclusivity stuff
User avatar
Ana
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:29 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:14 pm

why should sony waste millions just for 30 days?
i dont get this exclusivity stuff

People be more inclined to buy the game on a particular system, if they own multiple, simply to get ahold of the content quicker.
User avatar
sam westover
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:00 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:59 pm

Offered money, Sony would have done the same....
Good thing they didn't do that 30 day exclusive DLC thing with Bethesda or we would never see any Skyrim DLC withing or lifetime. For real, if they did do that. Would Dawnguard be already out for the PS3 or would it still be a work in progress?
User avatar
koumba
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:39 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:15 am

Good thing they didn't do that 30 day exclusive DLC thing with Bethesda or we would never see any Skyrim DLC withing or lifetime. For real, if they did do that. Would Dawnguard be already out for the PS3 or would it still be a work in progress?
Thats what Bethesda wants you to think...That they svck at coding ps3....
User avatar
electro_fantics
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:48 am

Why should Sony waste millions just for 30 days? I don't get this exclusivity stuff.
I think they are smart enough not to. Besides, the way Dawnguard is looking for the PS3. They would have wasted millions for exclusive day DLCs they would not be able to play.
User avatar
Sasha Brown
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:46 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:06 am

cause money, it runs the world man.
User avatar
Kevan Olson
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:09 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:16 am

That's what Bethesda wants you to think...That they svck at coding ps3....
Then why don't they get some game developers that have better experiences with it. To help them code it or even better. Have some of the people who designed the PS3 to help them code it?
User avatar
Kate Schofield
 
Posts: 3556
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:58 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:17 am

I know why the signed it Microsoft started throw money at their faces. Then they got drunk off of ms money and they signed the contract.
User avatar
naomi
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:58 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:20 pm

Then why don't they get some game developers that have better experiences with it. To help them code it or even better. Have some of the people who designed the PS3 to help them code it?
Simple, they dont really want to give it too much effort. It costs money to do patches and fix bugs, they dont feel like spending more of it on smarter people...at least thats my guess.
User avatar
nath
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:34 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:41 pm

...perhaps they did it for money? as all companies do?

just an uneducated guess.
User avatar
Thomas LEON
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:01 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:12 pm

Microsoft just gives bethesda an [censored] load of money (someone told me it was 3 million) just not to release it on ps3 for 30 days,sure it may be bad for the fans (which is why rockstar stopped doing it) but they aren't gonna turn down 30 million (and even if desginers do, it's up to the higher ups.)

Sure it might make a FEW buy the game on xbox if they have three console but people who have it on ps3 or pc aren't just gonna magically buy an xbox so they can get an dlc, no they will (annoying) wait 30 days or however long it is.

Overall I don't see it's worth money wise or result wises and is basically just microsoft throwing there money around to encourage people to buy xbox.
User avatar
Ash
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 8:59 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:51 am

Microsoft just gives Bethesda an [censored] load of money (Someone told me it was 30 million) .
If that is the right amount. I love how we have to pay for Xbox-Live, but they have enough money to do that. Maybe that's some of the money that got from all the advertisemants on their Billboard-box. Oops I mean Xbox.
User avatar
TOYA toys
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:24 am

Then why don't they get some game developers that have better experiences with it. To help them code it or even better. Have some of the people who designed the PS3 to help them code it?
Because Gamebryo- I mean the Creation Engine is such an advanced piece of technology.
User avatar
Christie Mitchell
 
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:44 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 1:51 pm

I know why the signed it Microsoft started throw money at their faces. Then they got drunk off of ms money and they signed the contract.

I like how people think that Microsoft shareholders would accept them just throwing unlimited amounts of money at game companies for a 30 day exclusivity deal. The fact is that during the previous generation, PS2 beat everything else so badly, that they got cocky and ruined a lot of their relationships by being less accessible then before, assuming everyone would just have to "fall in line". Couple that with a game system (PS3) which is a major pain in the neck to program for, and you wonder why people are willing to lean Microsoft's way. People at Microsoft know they are percieved as the 'evil empire' and bend over backwards in their business dealings in order to buck this stereotype.
User avatar
Damien Mulvenna
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:44 am

Microsoft just gives bethesda an [censored] load of money (someone told me it was 30 million) just not to release it on ps3 for 30 days,sure it may be bad for the fans (which is why rockstar stopped doing it) but they aren't gonna turn down 30 million (and even if desginers do, it's up to the higher ups.) Sure it might make a FEW buy the game on xbox if they have three console but people who have it on ps3 or pc aren't just gonna magically buy an xbox so they can get an dlc, no they will (annoying) wait 30 days or however long it is. Overall I don't see it's worth money wise or result wises and is basically just microsoft throwing there money around to encourage people to buy xbox.

30 million dollars? Get real, the entire Skyrim budget was 85 million. They're willing to subsidize a third of a third-party developer's game just for an exclusivity on some expansions?
User avatar
leigh stewart
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:59 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:48 am

30 million dollars? Get real, the entire Skyrim budget was 85 million. They're willing to subsidize a third of a third-party developer's game just for an exclusivity on some expansions?

oops I mean to say 3 million :facepalm: although wahtever the price was it had to be worth to Bethesda since they WILL lose money from PS3 and pc players who don't by the dlc's and move onto new games or such.
User avatar
Rachyroo
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:23 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:59 am

oops I mean to say 3 million :facepalm: although wahtever the price was it had to be worth to Bethesda since they WILL lose money from PS3 and pc players who don't by the dlc's and move onto new games or such.

Oh, okay lol. I think the exclusivity deals are probably more around letting the 3rd party guys have a slightly larger share of profits, and I think it only makes a difference at the point of purchase, for people who have multiple consoles and a computer that can run the game, they decide to go 360 since they'll get it a little sooner.

I think its a gimmick honestly, I'm not trying to defend microsoft or anything, I think they need to develop more franchises in house instead of this kind of BS, what other series besides Halo and Gear of War does Microsoft own that matter these days? Fable? Some old Rare owned franchise that a handful of people are awaiting a sequel for?
User avatar
Ron
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:34 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:52 am

I'd pin the blame more on the publisher Bethesda rather than the developers. Unfortunately that's what many publishers seem to do: effectively accept money from Microsoft.

Just how thick does MS thing people are? If anything, I'd rather wait until the DLC has been patched rather than spen £160 on a new console for the sole purpose of slightly earlier DLC. I hope Bethesda realises what a complete mess the DLC period turned because of the exclusitivity deal: hopefully after Hearthfire, things will be a little more stable.
User avatar
christelle047
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:28 pm

why should sony waste millions just for 30 days?
i dont get this exclusivity stuff

Some people even buy a new platform just for that, which means in this case, Microsoft will sell even more Xbox'es. And the money isn't wasted at all, they makes loads of money from it otherwise it would be bad for business, don't you think? :)
User avatar
scorpion972
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:20 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:12 pm

Don't know why they signed anything since Skyrim was a massive success :shrug:
User avatar
Emily abigail Villarreal
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:38 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:20 pm

I'd pin the blame more on the publisher Bethesda rather than the developers. Unfortunately that's what many publishers seem to do: effectively accept money from Microsoft.

Just how thick does MS thing people are? If anything, I'd rather wait until the DLC has been patched rather than spen £160 on a new console for the sole purpose of slightly earlier DLC. I hope Bethesda realises what a complete mess the DLC period turned because of the exclusitivity deal: hopefully after Hearthfire, things will be a little more stable.

Where is the proof Microsoft is paying out a ton of money for these exclusivity deals? Other then just assumption. Seriously, I searched for articles about microsoft and these payouts and can't find anything about this.
User avatar
Emily abigail Villarreal
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:38 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:59 am

Don't know why they signed anything since Skyrim was a massive success :shrug:

It all comes down to coin, thats how the world works as im sure you are aware.. They get a good deal with alot of money included, who wouldn't take it? and its only 30 days :smile:
Also keep in mind that even tho Bethesda has been very successful with Skyrim, they get even more money from this which means that their budget will be bigger in the future games :wink:
User avatar
LittleMiss
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:22 am

Post » Sat Sep 08, 2012 1:11 pm

Where is the proof Microsoft is paying out a ton of money for these exclusivity deals? Other then just assumption. Seriously, I searched for articles about microsoft and these payouts and can't find anything about this.

I think the only two games Microsoft does this exclusivity thing for is Elder Scrolls/Fallout and COD. Seems like people love to exaggerate on this
User avatar
Paula Rose
 
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:12 am


Return to V - Skyrim