They get free games and stuff nobody else can get their hands on, so it sounds pretty worth it to me.
Free games and swag are awesome, but given some of the things we put up with they alone don't make it worth it.
Now banning people? That's awesome

OT, bless all of your moderator souls for braving.... Skyrim General *shudders*
There are far darker places on these forums, trust me.

Wait... did I just get accused to being drunk while making this thread... o.0
I hope you were, because we'll be drunk when we respond.
And why isn't everyone [censored]ting on this guy the way everyone did when I started the same thread a few years ago

I agree, why aren't we complaining about JagarTharn12?
Whaaaaaat? They do what they're supposed to?

Let's go buy them a cake or something!
Yes.
There really should be a reward system for good people. Punishing bad people is pointless, but dangle a carrot in front of people and now you are their master.
And now you understand why we have a star system.
And since I've gotten all of the pithy replies out of the way. . .
Could we discuss the terrifying practice of making banned members un-persons? I don't really feel the need to discuss banned members, but a practice that mimics some of the worst forms of control from 1984 needs to be assessed.
We don't clamp down on any mention or aside, but it's a tricky subject to allow. The Terms and Conditions guarantee members a right to privacy, which means that mods and admin can't publicly discuss warnings, bans, or other disciplinary action. This makes any discussion of banned members potentially problematic as such conversations almost always turn towards question of how it happened, or why people feel it was unfair. In the former case anything could be said and we couldn't do anything to defend ourselves. Clearly a claim like, "XYZ was banned for improper verbal moods in conditional clauses," won't be taken seriously, but what about the claim that someone was banned for a minor infraction when this isn't true? Or a claim that someone never knew why they were banned when we had explained this to them.
If people want to discuss a banned member it really is best to keep it to PMs.