Massive Credit Card Breach

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 1:29 am

Right... As you're taking in a hell of a lot of money... It will get suspicious
They didn't take any money, they took information (primarily in the form of credit card numbers).

You then sell off the credit card numbers and carefully use only a few to make money rather than just burning through them all. The other information stolen is sold on the black market.
User avatar
pinar
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:35 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 2:58 am

They didn't take any money, they took information (primarily in the form of credit card numbers).

You then sell off the credit card numbers and carefully use only a few to make money rather than just burning through them all. The other information stolen is sold on the black market.

I smell experience.. :stare:
User avatar
Danielle Brown
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:03 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 11:20 am

Right... As you're taking in a hell of a lot of money... It will get suspicious
:facepalm: Forgot about that side of it. However, the hacker responsible does not have to expose himself to that threat; it's easy enough to find buyers for such data. I'm sure there are also plenty of ways to shuffle the money around so as to obscure (or make outright untraceable) where it ends up.
User avatar
DAVId MArtInez
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:16 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 11:41 am

I'll be checking my bills very closely from now on. As soon as I see something remotely suspicious, it's time for a new card. I can't risk something going wrong, especially now.
User avatar
Georgia Fullalove
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:48 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:10 am

There's been big breaches before, but this is the biggest one in some time, potentially the biggest period. Since Global Payments still hasn't been exactly forthcoming about details yet, it's still not known the extent of the breach.
Yeah, I've read of some of the earlier ones...so far none have affected us, knock on wood. We're pretty careful. But this one does seem potentially a lot worse/scary because of the method/port of access. ie you can avoid buying online and signing up for stuff etc. etc. but I don't personally know anyone who never scans their cards into one of those machines to purchase stuff, these days. :confused:
User avatar
Fam Mughal
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 3:18 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 2:16 am

I smell experience.. :stare:
I make all my money dealing with confidential patient information :evil:

Of course I make it keeping the information confidential, not selling it. :P Gotta keep my office HIPAA compliant :)



I'll be checking my bills very closely from now on. As soon as I see something remotely suspicious, it's time for a new card. I can't risk something going wrong, especially now.
As I said in the OP, it's best to go back as the breach happened most likely some time in February, perhaps even January. It's only now being reported. Granted, stolen credit card numbers usually aren't used right away to allow for a cool-down period so they don't get caught as fast, but it's simple enough for most people to go back through last month's statement.
User avatar
Mark Hepworth
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:51 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 8:27 am

Just another planned step towards implanting identification and financial transaction chips in people.
User avatar
LuCY sCoTT
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:29 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 10:04 am

i assume an answer to the following isn't really on hand but i will ask any ways:

do we know if the hacking was done by a relatively large number of people who plan to use all of these card numbers, or just a small group or possible one person.

I am guessing its probably a small group if not an individual, in which case im not overly concerned as it was said that there were possibly millions of card info stolen. i think the odds of my card out of the others being used to drain my account is as good as me winning the lottery.
User avatar
Karen anwyn Green
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:26 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 10:07 am

i assume an answer to the following isn't really on hand but i will ask any ways:

do we know if the hacking was done by a relatively large number of people who plan to use all of these card numbers, or just a small group or possible one person.

I am guessing its probably a small group if not an individual, in which case im not overly concerned as it was said that there were possibly millions of card info stolen. i think the odds of my card out of the others being used to drain my account is as good as me winning the lottery.
People who steal credit cards on a large scale sell the numbers on the black market after a cool-off period, they don't use them themselves.
User avatar
CRuzIta LUVz grlz
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 11:44 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 4:13 am

I bet money in my compromised account that it was done by a massive sweatshop LAN party of MMO RMT in Asia.
User avatar
Charles Weber
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:14 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 9:33 pm

Well I dont have to worry.. Suntrust will flag my card if more than 1,000$ is used in a 24 hour period.. even then they sometimes do it if way too many transactions occur within a few hours. It pisses me off when it happens, but at the same time I'm glad they are so cautious.
User avatar
dav
 
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:46 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 1:59 am

People who steal credit cards on a large scale sell the numbers on the black market after a cool-off period, they don't use them themselves.
Same way that people who steal containers' worth of goods will not hit the street to market it, they'll sell it to bigger fish who then pass it on to smaller fish/consumers.

Much like legal industry, there is a chain of supply: producer (thief) -> wholesaler -> retailer -> consumer. Small quantities can bypass it all and go straight to the end user, but the larger you get the further up the chain you have to go.

'Course, the anology needs some bending to fit digital goods, but the principal is more or less the same :hehe:.
User avatar
kelly thomson
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:18 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:28 pm

Well my account is safe for now. Hope it remains so.

If I have to get a new debit card issued from my American bank to Asia, that may be a problem. :confused:
User avatar
lucile
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:37 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 4:04 am

As I said in the OP, it's best to go back as the breach happened most likely some time in February, perhaps even January. It's only now being reported. Granted, stolen credit card numbers usually aren't used right away to allow for a cool-down period so they don't get caught as fast, but it's simple enough for most people to go back through last month's statement.

I wonder if this was the reason that the bank my family uses issued us new cards around that time even though the time on the old cards wasn't up yet?
User avatar
Emily Shackleton
 
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:14 pm

Credit card companies disgust me. I will never get a credit card. I'm glad Obama passed that law that puts some restriction on the credit card companies.
Credit cards are useful for certain things, they are safer for buying online and you seem to have more protection than if you used a debit card.
User avatar
RAww DInsaww
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:47 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 10:29 am

http://online.wsj.com/video/visa-says-15m-accounts-were-hacked/54B4ABBC-1430-4945-8ABF-1D20CB3F319D.html

Global Payments says they doubt it's more then that, but then again, this is the same company that took a month to tell us they got hacked. Also Global Payments have to recertify for Visa, and probably MasterCard. Two of the last 3 times this happened the company ended up flopping a few years down the road.
User avatar
The Time Car
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:13 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 1:50 am

Security through obscurity (which we all know is not security at all) is very popular in the financial and health sectors.

What I particularly enjoy is "3D secure", where they seem to imply that the more third parties there are who have access to your information, the better. Especially if they use embedded iframes and operate from websites you've never heard of. I asked to opt out of the scheme on the basis that it was a security liability. They refused and said it was compulsory. :rolleyes:

Combine that with my card provider's online presence that doesn't even use a password to login, and the utter disinterest I've been faced with when my card details have invariably been leaked (at least I got refunded, but that was all), it's not surprising that fraud is such a major problem.
User avatar
X(S.a.R.a.H)X
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:38 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 2:08 am

The 21st Century svcks :(
User avatar
kiss my weasel
 
Posts: 3221
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:08 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 1:54 am

The 21st Century svcks :(

Bits of it are okay, but I'm frankly disappointed by it. Back in the 1970s, I was promised nuclear-powered hover cars, robot butlers, silver-coloured space suits as everyday clothing, day trips to Mars and teleportation. Instead I have a diesel-powered car (albeit quite nippy, but it doesn't fly), an argument over who makes the coffee, jeans, day trips to Abingdon and walking. The 21st century has been a total let-down so far.
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:22 pm

What I particularly enjoy is "3D secure", where they seem to imply that the more third parties there are who have access to your information, the better. Especially if they use embedded iframes and operate from websites you've never heard of. I asked to opt out of the scheme on the basis that it was a security liability. They refused and said it was compulsory. :rolleyes:

Combine that with my card provider's online presence that doesn't even use a password to login, and the utter disinterest I've been faced with when my card details have invariably been leaked (at least I got refunded, but that was all), it's not surprising that fraud is such a major problem.
Did you try a new card company? Because I'd sooner shoot myself in the foot than trust a card company that gives my information to unheard of companies as 'security'.

Bits of it are okay, but I'm frankly disappointed by it. Back in the 1970s, I was promised nuclear-powered hover cars, robot butlers, silver-coloured space suits as everyday clothing, day trips to Mars and teleportation. Instead I have a diesel-powered car (albeit quite nippy, but it doesn't fly), an argument over who makes the coffee, jeans, day trips to Abingdon and walking. The 21st century has been a total let-down so far
I feel the 40s-70s had such a strong social/cultural imagination in the realm of ideas. But in the 80s, we kind of went down hill and started being rather bland in our ideas of 'The Future'. :(
User avatar
Nicole M
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:31 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 11:12 am

I was hoping for Sandra Bullock and three seashells in the bathroom.
User avatar
BRIANNA
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:51 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:10 pm

Did you try a new card company? Because I'd sooner shoot myself in the foot than trust a card company that gives my information to unheard of companies as 'security'.

I think all the card providers in the UK use this ridiculous 3D secure system, unfortunately (variously known as "Verified By Visa", I forget Mastercard's name for it) and they make it mandatory: a typical rollout is that you're invited to opt in, and the third time you use your card after the invitation you're forced to opt in. It reminds me of the "chip & pin" system where signing for stuff was replaced by entering a PIN instead; the card issuers claimed it was infallible, which was quickly demonstrated to be as ludicrous a claim as it sounded. The obvious intent of the banks was to shift the liability from themselves to their customers, but in a rare case of legislation being passed to protect the general public they were essentially forbidden from doing just that. It does seem that banking security is more about pointing the finger of blame at someone else rather than actually being secure, though.

I feel the 40s-70s had such a strong social/cultural imagination in the realm of ideas. But in the 80s, we kind of went down hill and started being rather bland in our ideas of 'The Future'. :(

Yeah, I noticed that. Growing up in the '70s, things were still exciting, the view of the future still optimistic, but by about the mid '80s everything had become cynical and money-obsessed and the hopes and dreams I remembered from my youth largely snuffed out.
User avatar
Sakura Haruno
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:23 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 4:41 am

I think all the card providers in the UK use this ridiculous 3D secure system, unfortunately (variously known as "Verified By Visa", I forget Mastercard's name for it) and they make it mandatory: a typical rollout is that you're invited to opt in, and the third time you use your card after the invitation you're forced to opt in. It reminds me of the "chip & pin" system where signing for stuff was replaced by entering a PIN instead; the card issuers claimed it was infallible, which was quickly demonstrated to be as ludicrous a claim as it sounded. The obvious intent of the banks was to shift the liability from themselves to their customers, but in a rare case of legislation being passed to protect the general public they were essentially forbidden from doing just that. It does seem that banking security is more about pointing the finger of blame at someone else rather than actually being secure, though.
Though I'm not UK, the way so much of our global world is tied into mandatory use of a credit card. I'd like to own a house one day, but the fact I NEED a credit score is just silly. If someone manages life well without a credit card, it should show they're much better at finances than with one. I know a lot of people have one on a 'just in case' basis, but I'm pretty much king of paranoid. For me, when a company offers 'Our security is infallible' tells me they're to secure in themselves and are more vulnerable than the obscure guy with the great protection.

Yeah, I noticed that. Growing up in the '70s, things were still exciting, the view of the future still optimistic, but by about the mid '80s everything had become cynical and money-obsessed and the hopes and dreams I remembered from my youth largely snuffed out.
Yeah, I love the corporatisms of today, but I also like to see some life. But world of today is lacking more and more in creativity of ideas. Take gaming, back in its conception, it was about entertaining and games that people will like as a whole, servicing niche genres. Today it's about making a return on the investment, selling it to the masses, and ignoring/silencing the people who point out the game's faults.
User avatar
Alisha Clarke
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:53 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 8:12 pm

The 21st Century svcks :(
Hubs constantly rages against how tech is being used today, often put in use long before it's likely tested well/proven, in the name of profit. The decline/fall of the famous old empires are going to seem paltry in comparison. But maybe we'll work it out first. Maybe.

I was hoping for Sandra Bullock and three seashells in the bathroom.
:rofl:
Every time I muse on what people might do if toilet paper was a very expensive luxury, hubs brings that up.
User avatar
Anthony Rand
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:02 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 4:45 am

They didn't take any money, they took information (primarily in the form of credit card numbers).

You then sell off the credit card numbers and carefully use only a few to make money rather than just burning through them all. The other information stolen is sold on the black market.
Or rather, uses the numbers to reverse engineer the algorithm that creates the credit card numbers to begin with -using a million+ existing number I can back engineer a pretty convincing CC number -using the right software.. then simply sell the generated numbers..


..the original CC information (name, address, zip code, town) is then sold to a data broker.

this way you're not actually using the stolen numbers directly, and the personal info could have been acquired by many different legal means..
:shrug:
User avatar
Jake Easom
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:33 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games