Exactly.

And that svcks because I wanna get on here and talk about the game without having to sift through the endless complaints from the small percentage of people who are unhappy with it.

A game that is so good at letting you do whatever you want that you actually only notice what you CAN'T do is pretty impressive.

You do realize that gamers don't game all the time right? We take breaks from gaming, be it for showers, cigarette breaks, eating, stimulating ourselves or hanging out with friends.
And, we use the forums. So the gamers that enjoy Skyrim aren't too busy playing the game, they visit here too.

Like me, I enjoy Skyrim but I currently feel like utter [censored], so I won't play Skyrim. I'll slug around here instead to pass the time.

I do agree that most criticisms are valid. What I'm saying is that there should be a general awareness that criticisms only goes as far as in the way that its phrased. Its like reading the paper scanning for interesting articles to read, the ones that Bethesda reps will pay attention to are the ones that are well phrased, balanced, constructive critiques, not one liners like this game svcks because this feature svcks. I've seen more forms of the latter ways of complaining. And honestly, I think its really grade-schoolish to on one hand claim that you love the game but on the other put so little time and effort into formulating and backing up critiques into something that people will want to read and take away from. 'skyrim svcks because destruction is underpowered' is soo retardedly simple that it hurts my brain to read.

if people werent negative maiq the liar wouldnt have much to talk about

You can begin with the DID threat: http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1291778-the-skyrim-dead-is-dead-thread-iii/page__p__19474579#entry19474579.