Someone agrees with Bethesda wars svck

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:40 am

i have completed both sides of civil war in skyrim i don't know about you guys but an army don't have in TOTAL 100 soldiers and same thing Fallout NV war in the end
User avatar
Yvonne
 
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:05 am

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:51 am

so that an Xbox or a Ps3 couldnt handle the game ? so that when you play in an xbox or Ps3 you started playing with 5 FPS, yeah that sounds really good :yes:
also why do people blame Bethesda when NV was made by Obsidian!
User avatar
Felix Walde
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:50 pm

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:53 am

well i prefer the dynasty warriors wars to me only problem was the passivity of the soldiers
User avatar
Evaa
 
Posts: 3502
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:11 am

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:10 am

http://lparchive.org/Suikoden-IV/Update%2045/52-s4-45-129.jpg

Why could it? It was in 2D. I know it is possible for some 3D games on current consoles to have tons going on, but none of Bethesda's games can due to how it is made. Ever got to that one part of Fallout 3's Broken Steel add on that had tons going on all over the place. Guns shooting, over 20 turrets it seemed were trying to blast the character apart. I don't know if this was just an issue for the PS3, but the game was on the verge of locking up on me due to how much slowdown it was struggling with during that.

Oblivion had a similar problem, but it wasn't as bad.
User avatar
Madeleine Rose Walsh
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:07 am

Post » Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:51 pm

If I wanted large, strategic battles I'd play Total War, not Skyrim.
User avatar
rheanna bruining
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:00 am

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:38 am

my had no prob at all
a dual core 4gb with 1gb video

well now already has quad or more core
User avatar
Gwen
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:34 am

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:11 am

If I wanted large, strategic battles I'd play Total War, not Skyrim.

but the skyrim war is not a war in max a skirmish
User avatar
Eliza Potter
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:20 am

Post » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:47 pm

http://lparchive.org/Suikoden-IV/Update%2045/52-s4-45-129.jpg

Why could it? It was in 2D. I know it is possible for some 3D games on current consoles to have tons going on, but none of Bethesda's games can due to how it is made. Ever got to that one part of Fallout 3's Broken Steel add on that had tons going on all over the place. Guns shooting, over 20 turrets it seemed were trying to blast the character apart. I don't know if this was just an issue for the PS3, but the game was on the verge of locking up on me due to how much slowdown it was struggling with during that.

Oblivion had a similar problem, but it wasn't as bad.

And then they went full 3D for their battles in Suikoden III but there still wasn't any lag because each fight was 6 on 6 lol.
User avatar
Luna Lovegood
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:45 pm

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:17 am

that's sad
User avatar
Tom
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:39 pm

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:32 am

Personally, I think for this kind of game, they actually pulled off the Civil War battles pretty well.

If I want something better, i'll play Mount & Blade.
User avatar
Ashley Tamen
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 6:17 am

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:21 am

if they want to make a war at least make it right if the consoles don't keep up they should make it kinda strategic like missions on assassins revelations or missions to kill generals or steal supplies
User avatar
Siobhan Wallis-McRobert
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:09 pm

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:46 am

And then they went full 3D for their battles in Suikoden III but there still wasn't any lag because each fight was 6 on 6 lol.
Haven't finished Suikoden 3 yet, so didn't know of that. Oops...

*gives thread shield in case it suffers from platform wars*
User avatar
Yama Pi
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:51 am

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:31 am

i have completed both sides of civil war in skyrim i don't know about you guys but an army don't have in TOTAL 100 soldiers and same thing Fallout NV war in the end

The Wars in Skyrim V mod seems to have disappeared, but Warzones 5 claims more than 7,000 npcs and 400 battles.
User avatar
Lawrence Armijo
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:12 pm

Post » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:22 pm

i saw but i don't like mods skyrim has enough bug by it self and mod are untrusty
User avatar
electro_fantics
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:13 am

You could use Warzones, if your rig is badass enough.

i saw but i don't like mods skyrim has enough bug by it self and mod are untrusty

:facepalm: Nvm. Your loss, don't complain about the game if you are too lazy to fix it yourself with a few clicks of the mouse and a first grade education.
User avatar
Dean Brown
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:17 pm

Post » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:02 pm

if they want to make a war at least make it right if the consoles don't keep up they should make it kinda strategic like missions on assassins revelations or missions to kill generals or steal supplies
This is actually a good idea. When doing the Imperial questline, I felt that all I ever did was taking over forts. Civil War could use more quests like A False Front and Compelling Tribute.


The Wars in Skyrim V mod seems to have disappeared, but Civil Unrest in Skyrim claims more than 7,000 npcs and 400 battles.
Yes, it's a good mod, so is Warzones (is it still around?). It also made me understand console limtiations better, because my two years old non-gaming laptop chokes even when I try to sneak by one of those battlefield, let alone take part in the skirmish :wink:


i saw but i don't like mods skyrim has enough bug by it self and mod are untrusty
Nah. Mods are necessary to save your game from bugs :smile: I mean Unofficial Skyrim Patch of course. But other mods, if they're popular and their author keeps updating them, are unlikely to break your game. Mod conflicts is what you should be wary of, that's why it's so important to read all instructions.
User avatar
Tiffany Castillo
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:09 am

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:45 am

Is it not more due to console limitations (maybe even more so for PC) you may notice a similar thing with Assassins Creed-although the impression is given there are lots of characters when you examine carefully its probably no mor e than 20 or so and most with little or no interaction.
Until everything games wise is beefed up (give it 10 years at current progress) nothing much will change-software developers are far more interested in gimmicks to try and sell dumbed down games en masse, console developers are under pressure if some of these threads are anything to go by just to churn out dlc or develop true hd capability or maybe even 3D-so who would committ to a thousand strong army
User avatar
LijLuva
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:59 am

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:54 am

Although a little more variety to the civil war would have been ideal (such as that cut content), I don't think large battles are needed for a game like Skyrim.

i saw but i don't like mods skyrim has enough bug by it self and mod are untrusty
:facepalm: Perhaps try out a few proper mods before judging them all as buggy?
User avatar
Chica Cheve
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:42 pm

Post » Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:16 am

Yes, it's a good mod, so is Warzones (is it still around?).

Whoops - meant Warzones 5, not Civil Unrest :facepalm:

WZ5 was updated on 1st of November, so still current..
User avatar
Prohibited
 
Posts: 3293
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:13 am


Return to V - Skyrim