» Sat Mar 09, 2013 2:18 am
Yeah, a set host rotation doesn't cut it... It wasn't really the case before, it's just that there were more stalwarts, and since some of them stalwart hosts were quite competent, it was easy to slot them in ahead of a fresher face. Variety is the spice of life, though, and newer hosts can bring with them fresh perspectives on evidence or game mechanics. It doesn't always work out, but that's part of the process. Besides, waiting on experienced hosts would hardly be feasible these days... Doing so would decrease the likelihood of getting a game started even moreso.
Frank, I paid only passing attention, but from what I saw you were a capable host and dealt with the many facets of hosting well. The evidence may have been straightforward, and with relatively few posts day-to-day, it led to quite little in the way of argument or obfuscation. Part of that would fall upon the short and simple write-ups, but part is due to the attitudes of the individual players, and you can't really control that.. Still, it did take several days for the innocents to catch on, which isn't a bad thing at all. Overall, well done.