Pure Mage kinda... svcks

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:27 pm

Beth has made it so that pure destruction is not a valid combat style, you'll have to utilize illusion and conjuration if you want to be an effective mage.


In other words... if you want to be a Mage you need to turn invisible, hide in a corner and watch as the AI plays the game.
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:30 pm

I think I figured out what the problem is here.

As a famous actor once said in his movie, "What we have here, is a failure to communicate."

In my previous post in this thread, I'm talking about problems at level 19-20, that spells aren't strong enough, and I'm owned in dungeons.

Most replies here are from mages at the much higher levels. I'm sure at level 45 with master or expert spells, I'd be doing fine, too.

Meanwhile, my destruction is at 35 (example only, I think it's lower) and I need 60 to get to the next higher level.

But you guys/gals that are doing fine, thanks for letting us know, but that really doesn't help much.
User avatar
Campbell
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:54 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:43 pm

In other words... if you want to be a Mage you need to turn invisible, hide in a corner and watch as the AI plays the game.


False. If I feel like it, I DH up, whip up some bound swords (I am weak there because hardly any 1h perks) and make a fair reproduction of a tanked up Nord. If I want to, that is. Much more fun for me to paralyze a bad Guy and bathe 'em in wall of flames.
User avatar
*Chloe*
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:34 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:57 pm

And we're telling you that Destruction is still broken. It's only less noticeable at lower levels. It's not just you.
User avatar
Channing
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:05 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:11 pm

Some of my responses are copy/pastes from the http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1313820-am-i-the-only-one-who-think-destruction-is-fine/. I suggest people read it to. I keep seeing the same weak reasons Destruction is fine. "Use minions", "exploit the system", "use stunlock", "yadda yadda yadda".

All things equal (<--See this?) again, all things equal, the mages "weapons" are severly gimped compared to the warrior type.


I would have to reduce difficulty as well, if I relied only on one handed. If destruction alone was able to kick ass like that, how easy wouldn't it be for combination mages?

You have to compare these:
One handed vs Destruction
Fighter vs Mage


Well then your one-handed character svcks.

When my Destruction skill is 3 times higher than my One-handed, and it takes 8x longer to do the same amount of damage, something is wrong, in my opinion.


My character can wipe the floor with a one-handed bound sword. Destruction just tickles them to death. Knowing the above, does that make sense to you?

Destruction only becomes viable - not competitive, viable - with the -100% magicka cost enchant and stunlock spam. Beth should've let Destruction scale and nerfed stunlock into a percentage chance.

EDIT: The issue is that Destruction is crippled due to reliance on other skills to even be viable. It's a damage tree, not a support tree, but it might as well be a support tree for all the damage it does. Destruction doesn't stand alone as a damage tree.


Agreed. Stunlock is so weak. Weak meaning stupid as is! PC users, save yourselves the time and just use the console to kill them. <_< It really is the same thing! You just save the time, that's it.

In other words... if you want to be a Mage you need to turn invisible, hide in a corner and watch as the AI plays the game.


Correct.


Play a warrior. But imagine when your stamina bar runs dry, you are forced to stop swinging while you "catch your breath". I mean nobody can swing a sword forever right? Your arm has to tire at some point. So what do you do now? Use magic? With your warrior build? I thought you wanted to play a warrior, not a battle-mage? Run away? What?

Destruction cost too much mana for the damage it does leaving mages completely weaponless and forced to rely on fleeing every battle, companions, or summons.There is no cost to the warrior to keep swinging. So what if he can't power attack, at least he can attack.

Destruction is broken.


Lets see how much fun warriors have then.

I just want to see Destruction scale properly like physical weapons do. Destruction is the mages weapon, why gimp it?

[snip].....I'm castling lower level spells because the higher ones make the game "take my sword away". (Run out of mana.)

At least with physical weapons I can keep swinging.

And before anyone brings up "drink mana potions to replenish it", I say, then sword bearers should have to drink stamina potions when they run out just to swing!!

Same poop different pile.

User avatar
Gemma Flanagan
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:34 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:20 pm

False. If I feel like it, I DH up, whip up some bound swords (I am weak there because hardly any 1h perks) and make a fair reproduction of a tanked up Nord. If I want to, that is. Much more fun for me to paralyze a bad Guy and bathe 'em in wall of flames.


Conjuring swords once in a while is fine, but when there is a weapon [bound or otherwise] in my hand at the end of [well] over 50% of the fights I actively participate in... then I come to the realization that I'm not really playing as a Mage anymore.

When I can handle three Falmer with just Destruction spells, let me know as I'd really like to play Mage with real offensive capabilities.
User avatar
(G-yen)
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:10 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:37 pm

Conjuring swords once in a while is fine, but when there is a weapon [bound or otherwise] in my hand at the end of [well] over 50% of the fights I actively participate in... then I come to the realization that I'm not really playing as a Mage anymore.

When I can handle three Falmer with just Destruction spells, let me know as I'd really like to play Mage with real offensive capabilities.


Strange thing to say. Wall of flames is a destruction spell.

Also, do you use 1h only no block no shield bash no armor no smithing no enchanting no potions nothing else at all?
User avatar
sara OMAR
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:18 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:18 am

look early on or later on the only reason to lvl dist magic is for enchantments that are the school house rock, ring the bell for my firey soul trap lighting bow, school is now in session, and named it "The Fate of Hus"
Hus was the guy that the pope had burned at the steak for translating the bible from Latin to english because "Its is only mint to be in God Lengo" for getting the fact that the bible's canon comes from hebrew and greek so it was only transcribed in Laten after around 150 ad and was changed in that translation, ex "though i walk through the valley of the shadow of death i shall fear no evil" in the old hebrew writings it really says " though i walk through the valley of darkness i shall fear no evil", also any time you see fool in the it is meaning wickedness because to be a fool back then was to not know about YHWH aka God, and to not know God was to be wicked, so any time you see Fool in the bible think Wicked, Its funny how things get changed over time.
back on topic
being a mage svcks 1st thing i did was max out distruct and was pissed at the skill points i wasted for it, its like putting points in lock pick why when you can buy 30 at a time from the furry kitty cats out side the towns,
also i was thinking on my next char to be a kj... i cant spell it kitty cat werewolf, but if that is so would i always be trying to kill my self.................. because cats and dogs dont like each other..... oh the questions and ideas for skyrim dev.'s
User avatar
Louise Dennis
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:23 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:29 pm

Strange thing to say. Wall of flames is a destruction spell.

Also, do you use 1h only no block no shield bash no armor no smithing no enchanting no potions nothing else at all?


I do wish people would stop this ridiculous argument. Do you use Heavy Armor to deal damage?

EDIT: The argument here is that Destruction does not stand as an efficient way of dealing damage.
User avatar
Racheal Robertson
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:03 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:43 am

I've really enjoyed being a mage as it happens. I've also perked up one handed which is a helpful addition, but actually I've really enjoyed it
User avatar
Vincent Joe
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:13 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:58 pm

I do wish people would stop this ridiculous argument. Do you use Heavy Armor to deal damage?


No, but my understanding is that you do use block to deal damage. Not true?
User avatar
Marquis T
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:27 pm

If you max out Alteration and Restoration you can take a few hits, max out enchanting so you're not out of magicka 99% of the time and max out conjuration to basically double your damage and triple your survivability.

Pure Mages take a lot more work to be overpowered but you can definitely get them there.
User avatar
J.P loves
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:03 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:12 pm

Im a pure Mage this playthrough and I'm only level 5 and I'm loving It.

Cheers
User avatar
Kirsty Wood
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:47 am

IMO, the argument is a non-starter. Sure, pure mages are viable. Pure Destruction mages (which is what many of us mean when we mean when we say 'pure mage') are not, or at least are not enjoyable for many of us.
User avatar
Silvia Gil
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:31 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:53 am

You basically want to listen to most people here. The two best magical schools(in terms of combat) are illusion and conjuration. Destruction IS something i do use....but it really is just support for your atronarchs. Hide behind frosty and spam blizzard, or just frenzy and summon two of anything turn invisible....presto! Everything is dead.
User avatar
Lexy Corpsey
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:39 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:45 am

You just need to work out good spell combos. Here's mine...


Mage's BBQ: Mass Paralysis + Wall of Flames :flame:

Drinking Buddies: Conjure Dremora Lord x2 :evil: :evil:

Perfect Storm: w/ 2 Storm Thralls, Storm Call (shout), Lightening Storm :shocking:

Hello Goodbye: Paralyze + FUS RO DAH :wave:

THO: w/ 2 Frost Thralls, Blizzard, liberal application of Ice Spear. :cold:
User avatar
Je suis
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:44 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:28 am

I'm playing almost all mage with some sneak and rare archery. Playing on expert, with destruction around 65 I have no problems. Boss fights are tough but they're supposed to be, because otherwise why bother?

I have 400 magicka and gear to regenerate it about 300%. It doesn't take that long to regen in combat. Throw a few fireballs. Hide, run, and heal. Repeat. Don't let them get too close. Use shouts strategically.

it's fine with me.
User avatar
Liv Brown
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:44 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:08 pm

No, but my understanding is that you do use block to deal damage. Not true?

yes and you can stagger people and get shields that rest. magic (or make them) for a magi a light armor shield is a good way to go............... until you realize that magi are week like i did and just use con , wards are ok but man they kill your mana and im not going to waist chant spots to have free alt, and 60 sec of dragon/eboney skin really at that mana cost??? who here plays on the higher difct. and has battles that last only 60 sec. with foes you need that with all you mana is spent healing and reapplying it. i tell you from over 150 hours as a pure magi....... i svcks no if ands or buts, if some one says it is distructor then they are playing on "my 60 year old neighbor beat a dragon and she never played a video game in her life" lvl.

she was wondering why i was screaming Foo Ken Hors (sound it out and you will understand) with my turtles on they cant hear it, so i bosted up the ol 5.1 and sub and let her fight a dragon she liked it.
User avatar
Amy Smith
 
Posts: 3339
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:04 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:43 pm

No, but my understanding is that you do use block to deal damage. Not true?


...

...

...

Jesus Christ.

Destruction is a DAMAGE tree. Block is NOT a damage tree. ONE-HANDED, TWO-HANDED and ARCHERY are DAMAGE trees. The latter three can stand by themselves as efficient methods of doing damage. Destruction does not. The only purpose of Destruction is to DEAL DAMAGE. Not to BLOCK. not to DEFEND. Not to CC. Not to BUFF. But it is an inefficient method of actually DEALING DAMAGE.

It CANNOT stand by itself as a primary method of dealing damage. ONE-HANDED, TWO-HANDED and ARCHERY do NOT rely on other trees to be good at what they do. DESTRUCTION does.

EDIT: In short, if you want to play a spellcaster, ignore Destruction and go straight for the other schools of magic. Conjuration's your best bet.
User avatar
Yama Pi
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:51 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:13 pm

...

...

...

Jesus Christ.

Destruction is a DAMAGE tree. Block is NOT a damage tree. ONE-HANDED, TWO-HANDED and ARCHERY are DAMAGE trees. The latter three can stand by themselves as efficient methods of doing damage. Destruction does not. The only purpose of Destruction is to DEAL DAMAGE. Not to BLOCK. not to DEFEND. Not to CC. Not to BUFF. But it is an inefficient method of actually DEALING DAMAGE.

It CANNOT stand by itself as a primary method of dealing damage. ONE-HANDED, TWO-HANDED and ARCHERY do NOT rely on other trees to be good at what they do. DESTRUCTION does.

EDIT: In short, if you want to play a spellcaster, ignore Destruction and go straight for the other schools of magic. Conjuration's your best bet.


Oh. Ok.
User avatar
Jerry Cox
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:21 pm

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:14 pm

Destruction only becomes viable - not competitive, viable - with the -100% magicka cost enchant and stunlock spam. Beth should've let Destruction scale and nerfed stunlock into a percentage chance.


This is pretty much what http://skyrimnexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=2275# does. If you play on the pc, and are frustrated with having to play a magic user within such narrow constraints, then you're the sort of person I made the mod for! I'm always looking for feedback on how I can make things better.

If you're on the console... I'm afraid there's nothing I can do to help. :(
User avatar
Patrick Gordon
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 5:38 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:12 am

Balanced Magic :celebration:
User avatar
Ice Fire
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:27 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:23 am

...

...

...

Jesus Christ.

Destruction is a DAMAGE tree. Block is NOT a damage tree. ONE-HANDED, TWO-HANDED and ARCHERY are DAMAGE trees. The latter three can stand by themselves as efficient methods of doing damage. Destruction does not. The only purpose of Destruction is to DEAL DAMAGE. Not to BLOCK. not to DEFEND. Not to CC. Not to BUFF. But it is an inefficient method of actually DEALING DAMAGE.

It CANNOT stand by itself as a primary method of dealing damage. ONE-HANDED, TWO-HANDED and ARCHERY do NOT rely on other trees to be good at what they do. DESTRUCTION does.

EDIT: In short, if you want to play a spellcaster, ignore Destruction and go straight for the other schools of magic. Conjuration's your best bet.

what book is that prayer in the bible
is it niv, or is it the living bible "the we are going to tell you what to think" version i would like to learn how to say it in hebrew or latin
User avatar
Scott
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:59 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:21 pm

Its a challenge, but fun
User avatar
Marguerite Dabrin
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:33 am

Post » Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:38 pm

I've really enjoyed being a spellsword as it happens. I've also perked up one handed which is a helpful addition, but actually I've really enjoyed it


Fixed.

Im a pure Mage this playthrough and I'm only level 5 and I'm loving It.

Cheers


Come back after level 40, see what ya think then.
User avatar
Marie
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:05 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim

cron