---- PC SCREENSHOTS ----

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 2:44 am

not bad, but BF3 looks a littlebit more real.. or am i wrong?
The BF3 forum is that way > ( points to a bottomless pit )

Thanks for posting those screenshots, sweeeeeeet!!
User avatar
Albert Wesker
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:17 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 3:59 am

What a total waste of time and money, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

As long as i can take one sorry-ass PC elitist to school, it's all worth it. But, it's not a waste of time and money, please fill me in on how.
User avatar
Brentleah Jeffs
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:21 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 11:04 pm

Imagine how much better it would have been if the PC's have gone up a generation aswell?! :celebration:

You [censored] up, don't do that.

What? I [censored] up? Sorry?
I'm not really sure what your point is. But mine, to sum up very quickly, is that the current gen consoles are about 5 years old. Hardware has come a long way in that time. Current gen PC's are incredibly powerful compared to them. So.. yeh. I'm saying if they were up to scratch by today's standards, then it could've looked a lot nicer, I'm not saying "imagine if they had made Skyrim in 10 years, how much better it could've looked". You need more info than "You [censored] up, don't do that." to make a criticism to be honest...

EDIT: It's not being "elitist" to say PC's are more powerful these days, it's being objective, rational and reasonable.. I'm afraid it's simply a fact. That argument is so over baked. You can prefer consoles all you want and that's fine with me - it doesn't mean your PS3 can compare to my PC in terms of power, and that statement is in no way a slant against you, or even your preferred gaming method. Play on whatever you want, but don't pretend it's something it isn't.
User avatar
Euan
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 3:34 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 11:00 am

Glad PC gamers got something to look forward to.

You deserve to have your investments rewarded, you just don't deserve to be the center of the universe.


So by saying we don't deserve to be the center of the universe you are implying we are the center of the universe? Awesome! I had no idea!

...silly console player trolling in a PC thread.
User avatar
Lewis Morel
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:40 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 1:47 am

Imagine how much better it would have been if the PC's have gone up a generation aswell?! :celebration:

You [censored] up, don't do that.
Hah, that's why i can play right now and mod later. Im downloading it from steam in 10 hours. Playing the MQ right now on the PS3.

Cheap bastards will stay cheap. Buy multi-console next time, homie. Laugh it. :toughninja:
Now I know its not allowed to be offensive towards anyone, but Im getting a feeling that youre a complete and utter moron.
PC's gone up a generation? We are generations ahead of the consoles.
Buy multi-console next time? What? Dude.. Did you hit your head 15 times too much or what? That makes no sense, PC still looks better than any console, still runs smoother than any console, and WILL ONLY GET BETTER WITH TIME. Why would anyone waste money like that?

Pure idiocy.
User avatar
El Khatiri
 
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:43 am

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 11:31 am

Now I know its not allowed to be offensive towards anyone, but Im getting a feeling that youre a complete and utter moron.
PC's gone up a generation? We are generations ahead of the consoles.
Buy multi-console next time? What? Dude.. Did you hit your head 15 times too much or what? That makes no sense, PC still looks better than any console, still runs smoother than any console, and WILL ONLY GET BETTER WITH TIME. Why would anyone waste money like that?

Pure idiocy.


It's called Sarcasm. What the [censored] is wrong with people.

My point is that if they wanted to make the PC users incredibly happy, they could have made it Aka BF3 or something in graphics, but they didn't. They made it for all the consoles. God.. The people here are some freak-bags.
User avatar
Rhiannon Jones
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:18 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 10:06 pm

Honestly, I'm sure most people are worried if their current rig will even RUN the game and less about textures.
User avatar
FITTAS
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:53 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 5:58 am

Updated. Check original post.
User avatar
Sara Lee
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:40 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 3:56 am

They look great. But im mroe worried about PERFORMANCE

Fast load times 5 seconds versus 15-20 seconds, better FPS and draw distances...

As long as I get that im happy
User avatar
Isabella X
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:44 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 8:48 pm

I am surprised that some of you are not seeing much difference in these screenshots. I am seeing quite a lot more in the way of better shadowing and textures. Those kinds of things tend to really become much more noticeable when in motion, that is why high quality video footage is the only true indicator of where a game stands graphically. I am not seeing any ugly textures here, while in numerous screenshots in the past I have seen quite a few. And although the shadowing looks simple, it still looks good too.
User avatar
Stay-C
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 2:04 am

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 7:13 am

It's called Sarcasm. What the [censored] is wrong with people.

My point is that if they wanted to make the PC users incredibly happy, they could have made it Aka BF3 or something in graphics, but they didn't. They made it for all the consoles. God.. The people here are some freak-bags.

How on Earth was that your point? Would you stop flaming please? You haven't made sense in any post yet.

Honestly, I'm sure most people are worried if their current rig will even RUN the game and less about textures.

I disagree, anyone who has bought a moderate PC in the last 3 years can run it no problems going by the specs.
User avatar
Cccurly
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:18 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 10:47 pm

The textures don't look very good. :shakehead:
User avatar
Sun of Sammy
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:38 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 9:17 am

I am surprised that some of you are not seeing much difference in these screenshots. I am seeing quite a lot more in the way of better shadowing and textures.

The shadows are much improved. Like, day and night. According to IGN, the draw distance is much better as well. It'd be interesting to see how far you can see details on the PC. I saw some console footage where ground details disappeared rather quickly with distance. Looking forward to see how much I can get out of it on my PC.
User avatar
Ludivine Poussineau
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:49 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 5:59 am

Alduin. Looks. Freakin'. Epic.

One of the only bosses in video games that actually have the ability to make me fear them just by looking at them. o.O
User avatar
Emily abigail Villarreal
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:38 am

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 3:01 am

On one of the most recent screenshots the draw distance looks like it goes to the edge of the playing map! Looks epic.
User avatar
Crystal Clarke
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:55 am

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 7:18 am

I expected more from the PC. Todd said the 360 was low and the PC Ultra. Looks more like High-Ultra to me. But anyway I guess it might be different when you actually play.
User avatar
Adam Kriner
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:30 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 9:59 pm

Looks beautiful.
User avatar
Miguel
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:32 am

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 2:22 am

Updated again. Check original post.
User avatar
Bambi
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:20 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 8:39 am

those 2 screens in the first post? i didnt read all but my xbox version looks same , i think even better in details !!!!!!!!!!!

i thought about buying an superb pc just for skyrim but now seen those pics i am very glad with my xbox360 version, deatils full, HD graphics full, Anti Alisijng, fog, weather, gras, plants, leaves everything full and smooth
User avatar
Oscar Vazquez
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:08 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 10:42 am

Looks absolutely amazing
User avatar
SaVino GοΜ
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:00 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 3:46 am

Looks the same as console versions to me, no offence to you pc buffs.

It's in 2560x1440.... That's more than DOUBLE the consoles resolution.... oh yeah, I'm on Bethesda forums.
User avatar
Horse gal smithe
 
Posts: 3302
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:23 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 1:49 am

http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6239/6331413399_88ec41763c_o.jpg

I hope we can change foliage distance....... maybe in the .ini file?
User avatar
JD bernal
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 8:10 am

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 11:14 am

is it really THAT much better than the PS3?
User avatar
Ria dell
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:03 pm

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 11:07 am

The UI still looks way too big for the PC. I thought that Bethesda said they would tweak the UI for the PC?
I hope we don't have to wait too long for UI mods, like Darnified UI.
User avatar
Solina971
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:40 am

Post » Wed May 16, 2012 12:59 am

*UPDATE TWO =======================================*
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6040/6332164100_6e74f66560_o.jpg
*==================================================*


If this didn't have the compass it would make a great wallpaper. Just incredible.
User avatar
Kahli St Dennis
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:57 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim