I'm really confused as to where you're getting this "lawyer speak and politics" nonsense. Nor did I imply that you're the one who said anything about a guarantee. I was stating that nothing was guaranteed to us, at all, meaning; we were not told of any solid information outside of receiving (at an undisclosed time, only a rough estimate) DLC. That is it. They didn't promise to everyone we'd be getting it June 20th, or whatever date you wanna pick for the example. If they had told us it'd be out at that time, and it wasn't, then didn't say anything for a month... I'd get it. That's annoying. But that isn't the case.
There you go, confusion lifted. ( relevantly unnoticeable towards the masses vague wording so they can be all like "oh lulz we didn't say exactly that so we safe") The fact is it doesn't matter if they didn't promise a specific date. They stated a specific window of release (Early July) in one of their blog posts and when the time past, it took them a bit to respond to the community. That is bad handling of the situation. Although the DLC was already in Sony and Xbox hands, they "had" to at least say something on the matter, since that window was now... well out the window.
And it has nothing to do with it being free or "owed" to you.
My point being; this DLC is STILL a gift. It is free because the developers are SORRY for the community's disappointment in receiving a slightly broken game. My "Birthday Gift" example still holds its point, as well as the fact that was no specific time given.
And like I said it doesn't matter if it is free or not. It ain't about monetary value here, but their credibility on the matter.
As I said, I don't care if you're upset. That isn't the problem. The problem is the obscene reaction from the majority. Pure out-rage and cursing at the company.
It is not your problem to care if I'm upset or not. It is Bethesda or Splash Damage to care, since I'm not your customer, but theirs.
I honestly don't blame the company for taking their time with this... There are MANY reasons it could have been delayed, all to our benefit (with few exceptions). Maybe they wanted to take a bit more time to polish it up or squeeze in a bit more tweaks to the game. Maybe they DID finish it in June and throw it to Sony and Microsoft, but something went wrong with them. Maybe their agreement was somehow botched.
The company is working for us in this case, and a majority of the community is cursing them for that?
Ridiculous.
Like I said it was already in Xbox and Sony's hand. It is true that it was the console company's fault for not releasing it in the window, but it is ABSOLUTELY Splash damage and Bethesdas fault for not updating us on time when the window past by. I mean they did a good job of that during the first delay. Heck we even gpt a blog update telling us it will be in early July, instead of the June prediction. They just fell off the customer support wagon somewhere in July
My main points;
-Beyond the customer service of the store we purchased the game from, these developers and companies owe us NOTHING. You paid the price already, whether you agree with it in hindsight or not.
I thought you said this was nothing about owing us anything. (refer to blue above) So is it they owe us nothing or is the question of owing us nothing not even part of the equation?
-The DLC is a GIFT. And you're acting like children because you didn't get it when you wanted it.
Irrelevant towards the point I made.
-On that note, the DLC was never given a specific date of release, therefore - it was NOT a guarantee on the company's part when they could get it out.
It was given a specific window (Early July) which is restricted by an actual date (July 15).
-This gift is free to us - as in; YOU HAVE NOT PAID FOR ANYTHING YET. You are NOT entitled to any services as of this point.
Just to repeat my answer above, since you basically repeated this point. This is irrelevant.
-I'm more than certain the developers busted their asses trying to get this to us. It has nothing to do with incompetence. (I challenge any of you to do it better.)
Irrelevant. Most devs bust their ass to get things done. This is a question of credibility on how they handled customer support after the release window.
-Most of these delays were more than likely for OUR BENEFIT.
The first delay was for our benefit. The second delay was because of Sony and Microsoft. Yet again it is irrelevant towards the credibility argument.
-I'm still confused about the "lawyer talk and politics" thing.
Refer above