If (the inevitable) crysis 3 can manage the detail seen in t

Post » Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:54 pm

Thats what i call grfx boys and girls.. look at the faces... no more puppet looking charackters..no .. real photrealism:

http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,655592/AMD-Cinema-20-Photorealistic-characters-with-Radeon-HD-4800/News/
User avatar
Brian Newman
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:36 pm

Post » Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:45 pm

But unfortunatly.. i think the hardware will need 15-18 years from now, till we will see this facial animation and detail on charackters in such a detailed enviorement as shown in the ruby demo.
Like 30 Gtx 480 and a 25 GHZ Octacore..and were there ;-)
Its a mix of voxel and and polygon, raytraycing tech used for the demos.

Some Crysis employees have seen them live ;-)
User avatar
sw1ss
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:02 pm

Post » Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:55 pm

Sorry i ment Crytek employees... my fault ;-)

PS: add an edit button!
User avatar
Victoria Bartel
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:20 am

Post » Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:54 am

Good luck getting at least 10fps in that benchmark even with a gtx 480.

The gameplay matters most for me , seriously I'd play Crysis even if it had DOOM graphics.
User avatar
Susan
 
Posts: 3536
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:29 am

[quote]But unfortunatly.. i think the hardware will need 15-18 years from now, till we will see this facial animation and detail on charackters in such a detailed enviorement as shown in the ruby demo.[/quote]
No way, i give it 5 years. Look at the character graphical difference between Farcry and Crysis and that was just 3 years, now look at Starcraft II another 3 years on and the character detail in that game (engine cinematic) is second to none. I'd say 5 years from now and we'll be pushing enough poly's to do photo-realistic faces.
User avatar
Kaley X
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:46 pm

Post » Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:10 am

Excuse me for being a newbie retard,but can these benchmarks actually harm hardware?Whenever I max out a game(I don't have the best PC out there)and it runs at 25-30 fps,i feel like the computer is overheating and damaging itself.I might be crazy but still.
User avatar
Josh Trembly
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:25 am

Post » Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:05 am

[quote]Excuse me for being a newbie retard,but can these benchmarks actually harm hardware?Whenever I max out a game(I don't have the best PC out there)and it runs at 25-30 fps,i feel like the computer is overheating and damaging itself.I might be crazy but still.[/quote]

The benchmark will only harm your computer if you have insufficient cooling systems... Benchmarks are meant to strain your system 100%, which is why they are really good for testing a new overclock or hardware to make sure it is stable.

If you have sufficient cooling, the worst that can happen is a complete lockup of windows or a bluescreen...no hardware damage is caused by benchmarks, but they do find any hardware issues. So if your computer bluescreens from it, then your computer has a hardware problem.
User avatar
louise tagg
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:32 am

Previous

Return to Crysis