This is not Tim Willtis was talking about in his promotion t

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:15 pm

Hello Doom fans and lazy bfg edition team.

Are you disappointed as I am ? Tim Willits in his promotional campaign of Doom 3 BFG did not mention bugs, dropping framerate, online lags, lack of effects present in the 2004 doom 3 orignal, painfull menus with lacking options present in orignal doom 1, doom 2 and all the other annoyances.
Tim Willtis was talking about POLISHED, BETTER, REMASTERED doom experience. I have clearly heard that. This is why I have bought the damn BFG edition.

Why nobody from ID or Bethesda is respoding to the posts about serious game bugs and countless problems doom fans are experiencing. "We" have paid you money and it is expected of "You" to fix the problems if you could not find them yourselves before releasing the BFG edition.

What is the release date of the patch I ask you ? :swear: Tim, where is my remastered doom experience you have talked about ?
User avatar
Jerry Cox
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:21 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:23 pm

Well said dude, I'm also a bit disappointed and hope in a reply from the team soon, the game is already good but it can really become a masterpiece with the right fixes, I've made a topic with my requests but no one has seen it apparently...
User avatar
Shannon Lockwood
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:17 pm

Now jmarshall's gonna walk in and say that we should enjoy this [censored] on its own.
User avatar
maddison
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:22 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:10 pm

Who is Jimmy Shelter ? I don't get it.

But I get one thing, that bfg crap is sloppy beyond belief, such product should not be sold. They said about better lighting ? They have removed a lot of it. Hell my doom 2 in this pack slows down sometimes, what the hell, I mean... Am I dreaming ? I want my money back you liars ! Watch the trailer: "REMASTERED" . it should say half-assed.
User avatar
CHangohh BOyy
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:12 pm

Post » Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:36 am

..., lack of effects present in the 2004 doom 3 orignal, ...

The only effect missing seems to be the shadows casted by the flashlight.
I haven't noticed anything else yet. All the shaders of the pc original seem to be there.
But i play on 360. Haven't seen the PS3 version yet.
User avatar
C.L.U.T.C.H
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:23 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:56 pm

Things that are lacking:

- imp's fireballs don't cast shadows
- firing a weapon doesn't cast any light/shadow
- textures are compressed so damn much, they're ugly
- when u fire a shotgun one third of the decals appear on the wall
- there's no original flashlight (I used like a weapon)
- fov is just bad
- in doom 3 idle plasma gun would illuminate walls with some blueish light, now it is gone
- blood stains are gone as well, when they do appear they are sparse, last a second, are ugly and so on, just sloppy work.
- some places in doom 3 were full of smoke effects from the pipes, the full room was foggy (awesome), in doom 3 bfg there is a little fart of fog - just a downgrade


I bet there is more of downgrading, it does not appear to be REMASTERED at all. I loved the original doom 3.
User avatar
Rob Smith
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:41 pm

@kingky: Some of the points you make seem to be related to a bug that makes decals disappear after reloading a savegame.
Blood splatter, bulletholes and stains on the walls/ground are there at first and disappear after loading a savegame after dying.
Try booting up the game and look for these effects.
Then load a save game and try again.

This effect is reproducable.

As for texture compression artefacts:
They seem to be less in your face in the BFG edition than with the old 2004 release when playing on "high" quality settings.
Compared to "ultra" settings in the 2004 release (which uses no compression) you may be right.

The smoke and fog from the pipes is there. At least in the 360 version.

About the lighting: Turn down the brightness to minimum. BFG edition is way to bright and less contrasty as a default to make those effects perfectly visible.
But to a certain point you're right. Lighting is different in BFG edition to the original.
Will have a final opinion on this after some additional testing.
User avatar
Naomi Ward
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:37 pm

Post » Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:26 am

They actually did say we'd be getting this stuff and it is dissappointing that we didn't. Most criminal is lack of muzzleflash lights IMO.
User avatar
Kira! :)))
 
Posts: 3496
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:07 pm

Post » Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:02 am

Most criminal is lack of muzzleflash lights IMO.
You may be right. Seeing a little fire image just "glowing" in the dark feels so... unnatural. A light-less fire... very odd, like something from an early 90's game, a fire sprite.
User avatar
Agnieszka Bak
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:27 pm

They actually did say we'd be getting this stuff and it is dissappointing that we didn't. Most criminal is lack of muzzleflash lights IMO.

I can't tell how it's on PS3 but strangely enough, the BFG projectile lights up the whole area on 360. But the BFG only.
All other gunshots don't cast any light. Maybe that's why it's called BFG edition... :biggrin:
User avatar
Jade MacSpade
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:53 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:25 pm

Now jmarshall's gonna walk in and say that we should enjoy this [censored] on its own.
Fixed it.
User avatar
Sarah Bishop
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:59 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:44 pm

On PC the BFG, Rocket Launcher and Grenade explosions cast dynamic lights, but the muzzleflashes are still absent. I haven't double-checked monster projectiles (Imp, HK, etc).
User avatar
XPidgex Jefferson
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:39 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:56 pm

Fixed it.

LOL :biggrin:
User avatar
Ymani Hood
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:22 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:42 am

Fixed it.

More like he's going to tell us that this is somehow a good thing and that all the things that were removed were causes for complaint in the original (and then talk about how he hacked extra lighting into the original code and provide a link to it).
User avatar
louise fortin
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:51 am

Post » Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:01 am

On PC the BFG, Rocket Launcher and Grenade explosions cast dynamic lights, but the muzzleflashes are still absent. I haven't double-checked monster projectiles (Imp, HK, etc).

On 360, imp and hellknight fireballs cast light but the illumination radius is smaller than in the old 2004 pc release.
Or it just appears to be smaller due to different overall lighting.
Turning down brightness to 0 looks different to the 2004 original. Specular highlights are more intense in BFG for example.

Lack of plasmagun projectile light is the most obvious. But i remember that this was frameratedropping in the original.
Seems like they used a single light source for every plasmaball fired.
User avatar
Tinkerbells
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 10:22 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:40 pm

More like he's going to tell us that this is somehow a good thing and that all the things that were removed were causes for complaint in the original (and then talk about how he hacked extra lighting into the original code and provide a link to it).

I bet 500 bucks that jmarshall is Brian Harris... :biggrin:
User avatar
Jack Walker
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:25 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:42 pm

I bet 500 bucks that jmarshall is Brian Harris... :biggrin:

I'll take that bet and give you - Tim Willits.
User avatar
James Hate
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:41 pm

I bet 500 bucks that jmarshall is Brian Harris... :biggrin:
My money's on Tim. Brian doesn't look like a stupid guy.
User avatar
Jason Rice
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:42 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:06 pm

LOL, undercover in the forums...
User avatar
Ymani Hood
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:22 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:21 pm

Now jmarshall's gonna walk in and say that we should enjoy this [censored] on its own.

My money's on Tim. Brian doesn't look like a stupid guy.

I take both as a compliment thanks :).

More like he's going to tell us that this is somehow a good thing and that all the things that were removed were causes for complaint in the original (and then talk about how he hacked extra lighting into the original code and provide a link to it).

I actually find all this very interesting, and for the life of me I can't fathem why you guys are complaining so much over stuff that is just fluff. I'm not telling you guys how to think, I'm just trying to pry into the why behind your complaints.

I can't understand for the life of me understand why Tim Willits didn't design Doom 3 to be a scary game. A lot of people(including myself), thought the Doom 3 alpha maps were the best, those maps had awesome cinematics(pinky and the zombie), I used to watch that scene over and over. It felt more like a story driven fps with unique non-repeatable events. Tim designed the game as a standard fragfest style game which was in my opinion what killed the game, and I remember at the time Carmack saying he didn't want Doom 3 to be a "playable movie", which is probably why they took some of those scenes out.

Don't think I don't have critiques of Doom 3 :).

Fast forward to the bfg edition, take a step back and look at the game as a fragfest instead of a scary game, a simple mindless shooter like the original, does that make the game any better or worse?

I'm not just justifying anything, I'm just trying to get a deeper understanding of your complaints, and see if you guys truely understand what your complaining about, or if your actually complaining over something bigger. Something bigger would be the game was supposed to be a scary game in your mind and not a fragfest.
User avatar
Michelle Serenity Boss
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:49 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:57 pm

Fast forward to the bfg edition, take a step back and look at the game as a fragfest instead of a scary game, a simple mindless shooter like the original, does that make the game any better or worse?

I've already told ya why it doesn't work: the gunplay is not fragfest-class, it's slow and methodical. The darkness and flashlight made up for that. Now they don't. Without them it's just a slow game that svcks at being fragfest, with more fast-paced and fun "meat" shooters on the market like Serious Sam 3 and Painkiller HD overshadowing (pun unintended) DOOM 3 like there's no tomorrow. BFG Edition just svcks. It svcks at being a remastering - Serious Sam HD, which, just like with DOOM 3, was a remake of the 8 year old game, nailed remaking, with gorgeous graphics and little to no changes in gameplay. Here it's just some lighting changes and effects being cut off. It svcks at being a gameplay changer, removing one of the core mechanics and not making the changes to accomodate the lack of it. It svcks at being the ultimate DOOM collection, with Final DOOM and Master Levels missing and DOOM I-II being altered, but, again, not changed to make up for the censorship. The only good things are the enhanced engine and new UI.

I take both as a compliment thanks :smile:.

Why? It isn't supposed to be one.
User avatar
tannis
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:21 pm

Post » Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:54 am

I've already told ya why it doesn't work: the gunplay is not fragfest-class, it's slow and methodical. The darkness and flashlight made up for that. Now they don't. Without them it's just a slow game that svcks at being fragfest, with more fast-paced and fun "meat" shooters on the market like Serious Sam 3 and Painkiller HD overshadowing (pun unintended) DOOM 3 like there's no tomorrow.

The darkness and flashlight made up for that. Now they don't.

There we go that's what I've been trying to get at. Remember I said "I can't understand for the life of me understand why Tim Willits didn't design Doom 3 to be a scary game.", all the flashlight did for some accidently added a dynamic to the game that changed it from a fragfest to a more immersive scary game. Remember though that wasn't the point of the flashlight. :smile:, because Doom 3 was supposed to be a fragfest with a small story. I disagree with Tim's choice to make a fragfest rather than a scary game, so I'm not backing him up there, just trying to get you to look at it from the designers perspective.
User avatar
Dalia
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:29 pm

Post » Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:13 am

There we go that's what I've been trying to get at. Remember I said "I can't understand for the life of me understand why Tim Willits didn't design Doom 3 to be a scary game.", all the flashlight did for some accidently added a dynamic to the game that changed it from a fragfest to a more immersive scary game. Remember though that wasn't the point of the flashlight. :smile:, because Doom 3 was supposed to be a fragfest with a small story.
It doesn't matter what it was supposed to be, only what it was truly matters.
Again, you forget two little thingies: GAME DESIGN and COMMON SENSE. They could just add the flashlight on all the weapons and call it a day. Hell, it was one of the first mods for the game. The flashlight was the way it was because of a conscious design choice and slow gunplay and the enemy placement all took it into account. And Doom 3 actually was immersive. Not really scary, but the atmosphere was all over the place and the immersion was unprecedented.
User avatar
J.P loves
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:03 am

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:07 pm

It doesn't matter what it was supposed to be, only what it was truly matters.
Again, you forget two little thingies: GAME DESIGN and COMMON SENSE. They could just add the flashlight on all the weapons and call it a day. Hell, it was one of the first mods for the game. The flashlight was the way it was because of a conscious design choice and slow gunplay and the enemy placement all took it into account. And Doom 3 actually was immersive. Not really scary, but the atmosphere was all over the place and the immersion was unprecedented.

I agree with everything you said, if Tim Willits thought the same way when came up with the design for Doom 3, and your right also when it you said it doesn't matter what you thought it was supposed to be, it wasn't supposed to be that way.

I agree it should have been a scary game, I can't figure out why they made the flashlight the way it was, but you can read all the interviews from him: Doom 3 wasn't supposed to be a scary game.
User avatar
Silencio
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 11:30 pm

Post » Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:17 pm

I agree with everything you said, if Tim Willits thought the same way when came up with the design for Doom 3, and your right also when it you said it doesn't matter what you thought it was supposed to be, it wasn't supposed to be that way.

I agree it should have been a scary game, I can't figure out why they made the flashlight the way it was, but you can read all the interviews from him: Doom 3 wasn't supposed to be a scary game.
Dude, those interviews are a load of bull and Willits is a big fat liar. Why else would they bring Matthew Costello, one of the writers for a horror game dilogy The 7th Guest - The 11th Hour on board? Why all the jump scares, laughter, all the disturbing imagery and monsters redesign from goofy to creepy?
User avatar
kitten maciver
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:36 pm

Next

Return to Othor Games