You say magic is weak

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 2:34 pm

Have you tried buying lets say the fire damage boosts :flamethrower: under destruction?

That might help?
User avatar
Curveballs On Phoenix
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 4:43 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 11:57 am

Yes. Destruction damage doesn't scale, leaving it weak at high levels. Perks do not help enough to counter this.
User avatar
Tiffany Carter
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:05 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 7:39 pm

I think what there going for is fire or other magic is your secondary

I hit flame thrower :flamethrower: the run up and slash with my sword :spotted owl:
User avatar
Josephine Gowing
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:41 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 11:51 am

I think what there going for is fire or other magic is your secondary

I hit flame thrower :flamethrower: the run up and slash with my sword :spotted owl:
So...you're saying they intended for pure mages to not exist?
User avatar
Steve Smith
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:47 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 7:20 am

I'm personally a little tired of "magic" being equal to "destruction."

I wanted to play a character build that relied on a tactical use of magic with other options for weapons (namely a bow) and I found it to be too obnoxious to actually switch back and forth between magic and normal hand-helds, especially bows or two-handers, and you can't do magic and one-handed because you can't block (for the same reason you can't block while dual-wielding, even though the whole "dual wielding swords and blocking is stupid" thing no longer applies).

While playing a pure mage, I attempted to level my other magics and leave destruction low becacuse I didn't care to do everything with destruction.

To be honest, if I have any complaints at all, it's that --

1.) The mana costs for the OTHER schools of magic are TOO FREAKING HIGH.
2.) Using magic is absolutely useless unless you're playing a pure mage with destruction as your main weapon.

At low levels, no matter your difficulty setting, your style of gameplay is to cast ONE non-destruction spell, then use potions for the rest of the fight. It's rediculous.
I don't really care that destruction spells don't "scale" well enough in terms of damage; if you had better mana regeneration and weren't forced to stack magicka buffs, it wouldn't be an issue.


Can you 'chain lightning' things to death? Sure. You can also use that enchantment exploit to powergame. Those are personal choices and are examples of small oversights (i.e, chain lightning spells shouldn't have been included). To use those and then declare the whole system overpowered, however, is ludicrous. You should never be FORCED to stack certain enchantments or perks in order to play an 'okay' mage, as it makes using any other playstyle more of a chore than anything else.
User avatar
Ana
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:29 am

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 6:20 am

I think what there going for is fire or other magic is your secondary

I hit flame thrower :flamethrower: the run up and slash with my sword :spotted owl:

Sure, sure

But why do that when you can just slash with your sword twice and do more damage?
User avatar
Chloe Mayo
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:59 pm

Post » Sun May 13, 2012 12:26 pm

Sure, sure

But why do that when you can just slash with your sword twice and do more damage?

Cause it's freaking awesome :spotted owl:
User avatar
Naughty not Nice
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:14 am


Return to V - Skyrim