Graphics aren't what makes the game, if a review downgrades the rating because of the graphics they had no business playing fallout new Vegas. I've played some of the latest games on my PC and Fallout 3's graphics and New Vegas's graphics are PLENTY good enough for what kind of game it is. If you think differently you likely have a terrible setup to play it on and need to play it on a nice setup before judging the graphics.

This post is in defense of the game before it gets reviewed

So blame the person instead of the developer then eh? How quait. It's always my fault when things don't go right.

Sorry I do not understand what you are trying to say.

Quait!!?!! Kuwait!!!

Quaint.

Yeah the graphics could be improved without an Engine change. They won't be eye popping, but with enough time some super good textures can be pumped out.

What if you think they are bad for being too detailed? (just curious :unsure: )

The thread title reeks of failure. My computer easily maxed out F3 and will easily max out FNV. The graphics are average, infact I would even go as far to say they are slightly below average for games released in late 2010. I dont need a better system to show me that.

This is jumping the gun isn't it. I think this kind of discussion should wait until everyone has had a chance to play it on their own set ups and then can make an informed opinion.