averaging 24 FPS with a Radeon 7850 @ 1920x1080?

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 3:11 pm

In contrast to it being completely off I might lose 5 -8 fps tops. 8x kills me.
User avatar
bonita mathews
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:04 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 8:03 am

I use almost the same setup as you do, except that i only have 8gb ram and a 6950 HD card..

This is just bad optimizing i think, how can my game run better on a worse rig?

i have 55-60fps all the time, never drops bellow this, my temps are about 60-70c, which are standard.
minimal overclock on both the i5 2500k and my 6950 card, just to speed up an already awesome rig.

i use both the offical HD pack as well as skyrim HD
User avatar
James Wilson
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:51 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 10:37 am

I have an i5-2500k @ 4.3ghz and a GTX 580 1.5GB and I get 60fps everywhere with settings on Ultra (shadows on High) with Ambient Occlusion set to Performance and 4xMSAA and 4xTRSSAA.

I have no clue why considering you have a slightly more powerful card (I have mine overclocked to 930mhz), why you would be averaging 24fps. I get higher fps that than that even with ENB.
I'm pretty sure your GTX 580 is more powerful,although that doesn't explain OP's abysmal performance
User avatar
ONLY ME!!!!
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:16 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 9:23 am

@Jackstarr

Using Simple Borderless Window mod I am sitting at 60 FPS almost all the time the difference is uncanny. I was getting avg 45 before using the 4x SSAA now I am sticking at 60 running 8x shadows bumped back up to ultra as well.
User avatar
JaNnatul Naimah
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:33 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 8:53 am

I have an i5-2500k @ 4.3ghz and a GTX 580 1.5GB and I get 60fps everywhere with settings on Ultra (shadows on High) with Ambient Occlusion set to Performance and 4xMSAA and 4xTRSSAA.

I have no clue why considering you have a slightly more powerful card(I have mine overclocked to 930mhz), why you would be averaging 24fps. I get higher fps that than that even with ENB.

As I said earlier, he was trying to use an NVidia feature (FXAA) on an ATI card. FXAA being an NVidia feature kills performance on ATI cards if enabled. Since you have an NVidia card you're not seeing the performance dip he was. That's the difference.
User avatar
Joe Bonney
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:00 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 7:31 pm

My rig:

i5-2500k @4.2GHz
Crucial M4 SATA III SSD
16GB G Skill 1600 RAM
Sapphire Radeon 7850 @ 1050 core/1450 memory with official release 12.3 drivers
1920x1080 LCD monitor, stanbdard 60 Hz refresh rate
vsync turned off in INI file

Don't disable VSync in Skyrim. It will only cause more problems. If you're concerned with input lag, use a frame rate limiter to cap your frame rate at 58 fps.

Playing Skyrim with the HD texture pack from Bethesda

Bethesda never released an "HD texture pack." Perhaps you are referring to the http://store.steampowered.com/app/202485/ instead?

At Ultra settings I noticed it was kinda choppy, especially in perpetually snowy cities like Winterhold. So I downloaded FRAPS and recorded my min//max/avr framerates running around Whiterun and Winterhold.

FRAPS is telling me 22 FPS min, 28 max and 24 avr. How is this possible? Reviews of the Sapphire 7850 at the standard overclock (920 core/1250 memory) show numbers more like 50 min, 100 max and 70 average on Ultra settings.

I've checked GPU-Z and the entire time I'm playign Skyrim the log shows the card is clocked at 1050/1450, so it's not that it is getting downclocked to idle speeds for some reason.

I am at a loss. I want the performance the 7850 should provide. Advice appreciated - thanks.

Make sure that AA is disabled in the game launcher as well as the video driver control panel options. This applies to all forms of anti-aliasing. Enabling AA or the wrong types of AA is a likely cause for drastic performance deficits. If you are able to identify this as the cause, you'll then be able to start applying individual settings to find an acceptable performance/visual quality setup.
User avatar
TRIsha FEnnesse
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:59 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 2:28 pm

Ya leave the FXAA box unchecked totally worthless.

I think it depends on the display resolution. I play at 2560x1600 on a 30" monitor and what little aliasing I see is handled satisfactorily by FXAA alone. I would probably opt for full MSAA for screenshots, but for regular play FXAA is effective enough. I'm sure at lower resolutions it becomes less so since the performance hit caused by MSAA is directly proportional to the display resolution, so 4xMSAA is more manageable at 1920x1080 than at 2560x1600 on the same hardware.
User avatar
jennie xhx
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:28 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 8:28 am

I use 2xAA with FXAA enabled. Get 60fps with that at 1080p with max settings. I use FXAA because things seem to have a crisp white outline (everything like people, grass etc) when I use just AA alone at say 4x.

My monitor has a button for basically increasing the sharpness of the resolution of the screen, do it does away with the blur effect caused by FXAA pretty much.
User avatar
Monika
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:50 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 8:29 pm

I think it depends on the display resolution. I play at 2560x1600 on a 30" monitor and what little aliasing I see is handled satisfactorily by FXAA alone. I would probably opt for full MSAA for screenshots, but for regular play FXAA is effective enough. I'm sure at lower resolutions it becomes less so since the performance hit caused by MSAA is directly proportional to the display resolution, so 4xMSAA is more manageable at 1920x1080 than at 2560x1600 on the same hardware.

On an ATI card I would normally use anything but FXAA. I prefer different types for different games for example:
MLAA Edge Detect for DX HR,
SSAA for Skyrim
and MSAA for BF3
which are the 3 games I currently am playing.

DX HR has Trilinear, FXAA and MLAA and if I toggle it in that I get terrible FPS same in Skyrim.
User avatar
Dean Ashcroft
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:20 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 7:12 am

@ kastagir, If you look back at some of the posts you'd see some of your suggestions was already given, and that the OP has fixed his issues. The only question he had was to do with FXAA, which too was answered and he acknowledged.
In short he doesn't need any further "fix" suggestionsat this point in time.

BTW you can check out this article on FXAA as it does work with ATI cards though the performance hit probably depends on game and card - http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/07/18/nvidias_new_fxaa_antialiasing_technology/2
User avatar
Kayleigh Williams
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:41 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 10:02 am

Ya for sure def seems my card was made to take advantage of the Morphological AA and Super Sample AA. It handles AA amazingly as well as Tesselation however the way it loads textures makes me wish I had a faster than 256 bit bus.
User avatar
Michael Korkia
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:58 pm

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 8:31 am

@Jackstarr

Using Simple Borderless Window mod I am sitting at 60 FPS almost all the time the difference is uncanny. I was getting avg 45 before using the 4x SSAA now I am sticking at 60 running 8x shadows bumped back up to ultra as well.

Thanks for the recommendation - I just downloaded and tried out SBW but unfortunately seems to make no difference to my fps - I still get 60fps with 8x MSAA and 25fps with 8xSSAA. (This is with no other apps running in the background other than Steam client, CCC, AVG Free, and Asus AI suite).

On the upside, it seems to have solved my "microstutter" issues, so I could use this rather than DXTory...
User avatar
Jordyn Youngman
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:54 am

Post » Thu May 31, 2012 8:24 am

Well that isn't all bad :D
Any AA is better than none at the end of the day.
User avatar
Beulah Bell
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:08 pm

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim