CISPA...internet privacy in jeopardy again (approved post)

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 4:17 am

Big Brother is always watching.
User avatar
Mr.Broom30
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:05 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 2:17 pm

Doesn't really bother me...

Surprise! :P
User avatar
Sheeva
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:46 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:10 am

Surprise! :tongue:
Well I'm sure 'they' can already access anything I'm up to anyway, and I can't say that's a bad thing because we don't need any more WikiLeaks crap or anything like that.

Besides, I always opt in to my information being shared. As far as I'm aware my Facebook is still 100% public, and it just doesn't bother me. I'm not really a private person or anything, if I were going to do something I didn't want someone to know about I just wouldn't do it online in the first place.
User avatar
james tait
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:26 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 12:11 pm

Well, it just passed trough the House.
User avatar
Kristina Campbell
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:08 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:16 am

Well I'm sure 'they' can already access anything I'm up to anyway, and I can't say that's a bad thing because we don't need any more WikiLeaks crap or anything like that.
Not legally and not easily. This will make it so everything you do must be logged for years so that in the event you do something down the road that they don't like or at all think is suspicious they have years of logs of your information to go through and dig up every last bit of dirt. This is the exact opposite of innocent until proven guilty and makes a laughingstock of the legal system.

Besides, I always opt in to my information being shared. As far as I'm aware my Facebook is still 100% public, and it just doesn't bother me. I'm not really a private person or anything, if I were going to do something I didn't want someone to know about I just wouldn't do it online in the first place.
http://www.attackvector.org/invasion-of-privacy/
User avatar
Robert
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 6:27 pm

The only reason the SOPA bill failed is because a lot of corporations fought it. If a majority of the corporations support this bill, then it doesn't really matter what the public thinks.
User avatar
Lyd
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:56 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 8:25 am

Unfortunately, the telcoms are supporting this because they do exactly this anyway, and have been for many years now.
User avatar
Nikki Morse
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:08 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:25 pm

Well, if this does get passed, it'll be yet another reason for me to buy AirVPN.
User avatar
cosmo valerga
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:21 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 2:42 pm

It won't pass, once again it infringes on our rights. If it does pass I will move to a different country out of shame for what the American Govt. has morphed into. This is not Democracy.
User avatar
Maria Garcia
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:59 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 11:00 am

The only reason the SOPA bill failed is because a lot of corporations fought it. If a majority of the corporations support this bill, then it doesn't really matter what the public thinks.

Which is very sad.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

^Declaration of Independence ^


It is still our right & duty. I think the founding fathers would be turning in their graves at the current state of our govt.

I am pretty sure it states somewhere in the Declaration of Independence that it is the people that control the govt. not the govt. that controls the people.
User avatar
I’m my own
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:55 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 9:22 am

Ugh. Either we needed another major site blackout, or the social media networks are suppressing it from any sort of trending list.
User avatar
Ells
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:03 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:04 pm

^Declaration of Independence ^


It is still our right & duty. I think the founding fathers would be turning in their graves at the current state of our govt.

I am pretty sure it states somewhere in the Declaration of Independence that it is the people that control the govt. not the govt. that controls the people.
The Declaration of Independence holds no political weight. You need to quote the Constitution for that.

But don't. Let's keep politics out of it and discuss this bill specifically.
User avatar
Chelsea Head
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:38 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 10:06 am

The UK has a similar surveillance bill being discussed and Sweden already passed theirs. I'm certain there are ones in other countries, though I've not heard of them.
The snooping bill they tried here failed.
Like being allowed to read everyones emails, web history, text messages, phone calls etc was ever going to be allowed.
It was meant to home in on key words, I'd be shouting bomb/attack/death/martyrdom/death to all down the phone to my friend, then when the police kick my door in I'd merely tell them I was playing Call of Duty and they owe me money for breaking my door and any other damages.
User avatar
Solina971
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:40 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:04 pm

Sick of all the governments appeasing conservative Christians... Back here in South Australia the government is basically abolishing MA15+ in favor of RA18+...
User avatar
Chavala
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:28 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 12:06 pm

The UK has a similar surveillance bill being discussed and Sweden already passed theirs. I'm certain there are ones in other countries, though I've not heard of them.
Was talking to a Kiwi the other day. Apparently the NZ pork board can, technically, place surveillance equipment in one's home with basically no process. They've also got a filter with a secret blacklist, are getting China to build them internet infrastructure, and generally making questionable choices.

Not legally and not easily. This will make it so everything you do must be logged for years so that in the event you do something down the road that they don't like or at all think is suspicious they have years of logs of your information to go through and dig up every last bit of dirt. This is the exact opposite of innocent until proven guilty and makes a laughingstock of the legal system.
Would also be an extremely juicy target for malicious types. Governments do have very high security when they want it (I won't insult them unduly on that point), but a database holding years of personal information about every internet user in the USA? That would be one of the biggest targets in the world.

I can imagine other nations trying to get into it, too. Not in any way that could be traced back to them, obviously, but I wouldn't be surprised if a little money disappears from budgets ere and there...

Perhaps I'm just getting a bit paranoid. On the other hand, this hat is shiny!
User avatar
Scotties Hottie
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:40 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:42 pm

I don't really care anymore..
User avatar
Donatus Uwasomba
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 7:22 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:13 pm

Funny I haven't heard about this until just the other day, it is being kept relatively quiet.

According to Wikipedia it passed yesterday.... before that Obama threatened to Vito it.
User avatar
pinar
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:35 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 6:14 pm

Funny I haven't heard about this until just the other day, it is being kept relatively quiet.
According to Wikipedia it passed yesterday.... before that Obama threatened to Vito it.
It passed in the House, the Senate is going to vote on it today, and the prez said the same thing in regards to the NDAA.


The future looks grim.
User avatar
Jonny
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:04 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:46 pm

One of the problems I see is that people don't care about their privacy.

They "don't do anything wrong" and "have nothing to hide", so they don't care who sees what they do or say on the internet or anywhere else. The problem with this is that they put the kind of information out there that feeds cyber criminals. Then governments can use crime as a reason to gather information on their citizenry and monitor content.

We should all be conscious of not putting anything out there that can be used by criminals. The argument that "I've got nothing to hide" is also very flawed. We have been conditioned to be suspicious about those who believe privacy is a good thing.
User avatar
Dylan Markese
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:58 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:52 am

Sick of all the governments appeasing conservative Christians... Back here in South Australia the government is basically abolishing MA15+ in favor of RA18+...
:facepalm:
User avatar
Anna Kyselova
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:42 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 10:53 am

:facepalm:
That actually wouldn't be such a bad thing for advlt gamers. Would mean that the people classifying games could finally allow games that are a little too harsh to justify a MA15+ rating (Fallout 3's morphine thing is one example). Unless there's something more to it...

We should all be conscious of not putting anything out there that can be used by criminals. The argument that "I've got nothing to hide" is also very flawed. We have been conditioned to be suspicious about those who believe privacy is a good thing.
*Someone introduces legislation to allow watching people while they sleep are in bed*

"Why should I care? It's not like I do anything wrong while I sleep; I've got nothing to hide."
"But the wording would allow it to be extended to watching you *cough* relate to your partner, or listen in on phone calls made while in contact with your bed, or, or, or... And the fact that they would not only be able to do this, but would be able to do it on a whim, is at least as bad in itself."
"You must be a terrorist?"
User avatar
Karl harris
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 3:17 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 7:41 pm

In Victoria the government phones are now monitored so now when i talk to the local government office i keep putting in words like, weapons of mass destruction, plastic explosive, fertiliser, bomb, just to give the guys on the other end something to do so they can waste there time, investigating a non event. What i wanted to do was have the phone off the hook and just play hours of music over the phone so they would have this long recording of just music.
User avatar
Damien Mulvenna
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 12:25 pm

This is not Democracy.
Was it ever a Democracy? Back in the 50's they did exactly this looking for those commie bastards. Same game different name.
User avatar
ANaIs GRelot
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:19 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 1:36 pm

:wallbash:

It's stupid crap like this the Government does that makes me hate being an American. Our Government is attempting to be omnipotent godmen.

and that whole quote from the Declaration earlier, yea have fun doing that and being labeled a terrorist. America is stupid like that.
User avatar
N Only WhiTe girl
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:30 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 1:38 pm

Where's anonymous when you need em... maybe the whole anon thing was a joke/fake/coverup? Or maybe tis issomethin bigger than their capabilities?

User avatar
Calum Campbell
 
Posts: 3574
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:55 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games