Rock band.
Rock band 2.
Rock band: Beatles
Rock band 3.
Fallout 3.
Fallout New Vegas.
Bayonetta.
... only ONE of those games do I wish I could get a refund on, and I'll give you a hint: it starts with "B" and ends with an "ayonetta". (It was fun for an hour or so, don't get me wrong.)
FNV is released at a price point below most saturday morning cartoon spinoff game trash. Bayonetta was $80/CND on release day, and it's nowhere NEAR as awesome as FNV.
From the perspective of a software engineer: This product is -amazing-. The attention to detail, the characters, everything about this game demonstrates how passionate the designers, developers, engineers, and artists were. Who is to blame? Alright, let's put it all on the game testers for the bugs.
Extremists on forums tend to say it's "the best" or "the worst", but really it's probably somewhere right in the middle. Rarely do I see people post their opinion on something with "I have no serious opinion in either direction," but rather something like "I hate it it's the worst pile of crap to ever be crapped" OR "I LOVE it, best thing ever made and ever will be made PERIOD." I realize this trend and I try not to be svcked into such extremes, but I've given it a lot of thought:
Fallout 3 and Fallout: New Vegas are the best games I have ever played.
I mean this 100%, and my gaming days go back a long way. ETQW, World of Warcraft, Quake, Super Mario World, Double Dragon, Master Blaster, Nibbles, L.O.R.D, SRE, BRE, etc... I know, some of these aren't very great by comparison, but my point is this: compare the AVERAGE game released today against F3 or FNV. Most of them are (by comparison) crap and cost the same if not more.
The problem is F3 set the bar and I think the expectations some people had for FNV may have been a bit unreasonable, but I can say it is clearly not a bad product, it isn't even a good product, it's at least a great product.
