does generic brand taste different

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:47 am

me and my friend were just talking about it and we were wondering what others thought, do generic brand food products taste any different or is it just your mind telling you that because it is less expensive that it is not as good?
User avatar
joseluis perez
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:14 pm

Different recipes = similar but overall different taste.

Also, more times than not there is a direct correlation between cost and quality. Better quality = better taste.
User avatar
RAww DInsaww
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:47 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:17 pm

Yes there's always a difference.Is it always bad, no.
User avatar
Monique Cameron
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:30 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 3:27 pm

I've never really noticed any. :shrug:
User avatar
Jake Easom
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:33 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:48 pm

It depends on the item. For, say, cereal, I've not noticed a difference. Soda, on the other hand, there is a taste difference.
User avatar
GRAEME
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 2:48 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:12 am

It depends on the item. For, say, cereal, I've not noticed a difference. Soda, on the other hand, there is a taste difference.

This, exact same examples 2, my family buys cheap cereal, tastes just like normal I used to buy. Purchased some cheap soda before, tasted different to the usual stuff.
User avatar
Mark Hepworth
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:51 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:54 pm

The strength of a generic brand is its ability to recreate the experience of name brands with a lower production cost. What you end up with are things that are very similar to the real thing, but not quite there. And depending on the specific kind of product it is, people will care more or less. I'm fine eating generic chips and candy, for instance, but I can't stand generic soda. In fact, I pretty much can't stand anything that isn't Coke Zero. Not even regular Coke. Soda, as it happens, is one of the most preferential products out there. People pick a kind they like and reject all others more than they do with most other products.
User avatar
ONLY ME!!!!
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:16 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:33 am

"It depends"
User avatar
Joie Perez
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:25 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:40 pm

In some cases.

In some cases the off brand stuff tastes better then the top selling brands. I often like generic brands more. Food items that save me money often give me a mental ease. If I buy expensive stuff, sure it tastes good, but then I wish I would've bought the cheaper stuff later.
User avatar
Lauren Graves
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:03 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:44 am

The strength of a generic brand is its ability to recreate the experience of name brands with a lower production cost. What you end up with are things that are very similar to the real thing, but not quite there. And depending on the specific kind of product it is, people will care more or less. I'm fine eating generic chips and candy, for instance, but I can't stand generic soda. In fact, I pretty much can't stand anything that isn't Coke Zero. Not even regular Coke. Soda, as it happens, is one of the most preferential products out there. People pick a kind they like and reject all others more than they do with most other products.

i remember when we were trying to cut back by buying "Sams Club" soda, after the first 12 pack we went back to Coke.
User avatar
Sophie Louise Edge
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:09 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:48 pm

Depends. Imitation Vernors? Crap.

As evidenced by others, the on / off-brand pop tends to taste different, while other things like cereal tend to be similar.

And yes, it's pop. :P
User avatar
Sunny Under
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:31 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:51 pm

Generic brands are sometimes the exact same thing, but this usually only happens with medication, not food.

Some generic food is technically the same stuff but is undesirable for some reason: perhaps it was the end of the batch or made while the machinery was heating up, or perhaps it failed some internal taste QA even though it's mostly fine and perfectly safe to eat. (These problems are sometimes true of the brand products found at discount grocery stores as well.)

But most of the time the generic foods really are different than the brand items. We shop at a very nice grocery chain and the store brand foods are often just as nice as the brand names, although even here they don't taste the same. The discount chain closer to us isn't worth going to but when I tried out their store brand soda I was quite unimpressed (and the box ripped open on the way home, so it was also shoddily packaged).
User avatar
roxanna matoorah
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 6:01 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:26 pm

Generic brands taste different to me, especially when it comes to water, of all things.
User avatar
Jeremy Kenney
 
Posts: 3293
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:31 pm

Home brand is nothing more than a brand name product in a plain packet. That doesn't necessarily mean it a good brand or even one you've ever seen before.
User avatar
Project
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:11 am

Depends on the product but most of the times if something is more expensive than the other (not necessarly overpriced obviously) it's a higher quality product, and higher quality = better product.
User avatar
victoria gillis
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:50 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:47 pm

The strength of a generic brand is its ability to recreate the experience of name brands with a lower production cost. What you end up with are things that are very similar to the real thing, but not quite there. And depending on the specific kind of product it is, people will care more or less. I'm fine eating generic chips and candy, for instance, but I can't stand generic soda. In fact, I pretty much can't stand anything that isn't Coke Zero. Not even regular Coke. Soda, as it happens, is one of the most preferential products out there. People pick a kind they like and reject all others more than they do with most other products.


Mountain Dew FTW
User avatar
emma sweeney
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:02 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:03 am

Marshmallows typically taste the same regardless of the brand name. In fact the name brand marshmallows we get are often really sticky and not very fluffy while the generic brand is easier to handle because they are not sticky and are fluffy and lighter.

Overall the taste is the same (especially when you roast them :liplick: ) but the generic brand wins out in terms of quality.
User avatar
matt
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 10:17 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:55 am

I buy whatever is cheapest, regardless of taste :P
User avatar
Jimmie Allen
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:39 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:53 pm

And yes, it's pop. :P


Better than saying soda-pop, I guess :P Actually it's weird I say soda because the regional dialect here would refer to it as pop.

On-Topic: Does the Pibb series count as imitation soda? I've heard it's supposed to taste like Dr Pepper but iunno.
User avatar
emily grieve
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:55 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:59 am

It depends on the item. For, say, cereal, I've not noticed a difference. Soda, on the other hand, there is a taste difference.

This sums up my experiences.
User avatar
Dale Johnson
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:24 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:45 am

Depends. Imitation Vernors? Crap.

As evidenced by others, the on / off-brand pop tends to taste different, while other things like cereal tend to be similar.

And yes, it's pop. :P

:foodndrink:
I can't stand any ginger ale that isn't Vernors, maybe I'm just spoiled. I don't notice much of a difference between off brand cola's or lemon-lime Sprite imitators, while Mountain Dew imitations, however, never taste like the original. Most other off brand food oddities vary depending on the product, some can taste very close with only a minimal difference, while others may have an entirely different taste; sometimes good, sometimes bad.
User avatar
Gisela Amaya
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:29 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:14 am

It depends on the item. For, say, cereal, I've not noticed a difference. Soda, on the other hand, there is a taste difference.

This

Mountain Dew FTW

And this.

However, as I am poor, I buy Shasta Cherry Cola. Because it is .79 cents for a four-pack. So less than $5 a 24-pack.
User avatar
Jonathan Montero
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:22 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:34 pm

I think generic brands taste better than name brands. For example, Walmart's generic Lucky Charms taste a whole lot better than the name brand, and the same goes for Coco Rice, Honey Combs, Corn Pops, and Raisin Bran.
User avatar
Matthew Barrows
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:24 pm

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:53 pm

Real oreos>Generic brand oreos.
User avatar
Lifee Mccaslin
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:03 am

Post » Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:03 am

Real oreos>Generic brand oreos.

This x1000.

Pretty much every name brand cookie is better than the generic brands.
User avatar
NeverStopThe
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:25 pm

Next

Return to Othor Games