Eerie Image Captured in Woods : Othor Games

» Sat May 28, 2011 5:07 pm

That looks so ridiculously fake/photoshop against that background :rolleyes:

That's not the least of its concerns. I see no possible methods of reproduction in that thing's anatomy.

...What? It's not like I was looking for that. I was staring at the picture closely to see if I could find a part of it that would have been a dead giveaway for photoshopping and noticed that, indeed, that thing couldn't have been born if it's a member of any actual species.

EDIT: Legogod, what event are you referring to? I don't remember yelling at Rmctagg over this picture, especially because it's recent.

EDIT2: Are you referring to "GET OFF BGSF NAO, MCTAGGERT?" Because that was my CMOF, not actually yelling at him.

» Sat May 28, 2011 4:43 pm

Meh, I'm probably just being too hopeful. What gets me is the video from long ago that displays something very similar, but it can't be a shop because it's in video. True, it can still be hoaxed, but I know one thing..that isn't someone acting as a monster. It's too skinny and bony for that. Also, the reflection in the eyes from the IFR is strikingly realistic. Honestly, I have no idea what to make of any of it. Of course, I'm likely in the vast minority with this mindset. :shrug:

A possible, albeit unlikely, explanation, is that they found some guy with a severe physical disorder to play act for them in the woods without his clothes on. :laugh:

» Sat May 28, 2011 10:34 am

Looks familiar there...
http://i54.tinypic.com/28vf0oo.jpg

» Sat May 28, 2011 2:47 pm

Well, hey, will you look at that?

Mystery solved in under two pages, gang. I guess it's time to put the Mystery Mobile back in reverse and head home.

» Sat May 28, 2011 3:53 am

Looks familiar there...
http://i54.tinypic.com/28vf0oo.jpg

Now I'm leaning towards the hoax side. I could say things like "Well, maybe the image was being circulated before now and that website just now found out about the story", but meh. Better to let it go than get disappointed.

» Sat May 28, 2011 10:39 am

Looks familiar there...
http://i54.tinypic.com/28vf0oo.jpg

What's that from?

» Sat May 28, 2011 9:35 am

When I first saw the pic, I just thought, Quarantine. (American version of the movie REC.)

» Sat May 28, 2011 4:48 pm

When I first saw the pic, I just thought, Quarantine. (American version of the movie REC.)

Hah, Quaratine wishes it had images as good as that.

» Sat May 28, 2011 6:48 am

come over here stalker; lets have a chat

Get out of here Stalker. Get out of here Stalker. Get ouf of her...

Okay. Enough.

I do wonder from which media the creature is from because it is indeed cool looking.

» Sat May 28, 2011 12:24 pm

That's not the least of its concerns. I see no possible methods of reproduction in that thing's anatomy.

...What? It's not like I was looking for that. I was staring at the picture closely to see if I could find a part of it that would have been a dead giveaway for photoshopping and noticed that, indeed, that thing couldn't have been born if it's a member of any actual species.

EDIT: Legogod, what event are you referring to? I don't remember yelling at Rmctagg over this picture, especially because it's recent.

EDIT2: Are you referring to "GET OFF BGSF NAO, MCTAGGERT?" Because that was my CMOF, not actually yelling at him.

I did notice that, but I didn't want to be the first to say it :disguise:

» Sat May 28, 2011 8:04 am

Pretty obvious hoax in my mind (both the photo and the video). The photo is pretty easy. It's a blob of white. There's literally no extraneous detail. The rest of the picture has decent detail, and then there's asymmetrical blob man! Sticks out like a sore thumb.

As for the video, pretty clearly faked. Everything is too set up. Only a quick look at the face and barely any movement, and the same old tired 'Run away with crazy camera work!' that every hoax video has got to have.

» Sat May 28, 2011 9:57 am

Hah, Quaratine wishes it had images as good as that.

If only this statement wasn't true. :laugh:

» Sat May 28, 2011 9:12 am

Am I the only one that noticed its wearing pants?

» Sat May 28, 2011 5:18 am

Am I the only one that noticed its wearing pants?

Did some clearing up with Photoshop, sure looks like it:
http://i52.tinypic.com/t03ryh.jpg

» Sat May 28, 2011 6:03 am

BGSF Sooby Doo gang, gogogo.

» Sat May 28, 2011 10:56 am

That looks so ridiculously fake/photoshop against that background :rolleyes:

This. I've seen better "scary face" videos on YouTube. ^_^

» Sat May 28, 2011 11:05 am

It's either the cryptozoological find of the year or a major hoax.

» Sat May 28, 2011 6:00 am

:blink:

» Sat May 28, 2011 3:30 am

*yawns*

» Sat May 28, 2011 3:02 am

BGSF Sooby Doo gang, gogogo.

you sir stole my idea v.v i was about to write " scooby doo got nothing on bgsf " xD

Damn you and your quick thinking !!!

» Sat May 28, 2011 7:34 am

I think Gollum lost his precious again... we can lure him out of the forest with a ring!

Edit: and yes, it's clearly a fake.

» Sat May 28, 2011 10:04 am

Fake, my friend put this exact picture on his Face Book account and claimed he took the picture a month ago.

» Sat May 28, 2011 12:42 pm

If they kill the thing it's only going to have 2 or 3 bottle caps as loot...

» Sat May 28, 2011 5:06 pm

If they kill the thing it's only going to have 2 or 3 bottle caps as loot...

That's still 2 or 3 more than you had before you shot it!

And you're right, it does look like a feral ghoul. That's why I always go into the woods with my German shepherd.

» Sat May 28, 2011 8:02 am

That looks horribly fake.