Eerie Image Captured in Woods

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:07 pm

That looks so ridiculously fake/photoshop against that background :rolleyes:


That's not the least of its concerns. I see no possible methods of reproduction in that thing's anatomy.


...What? It's not like I was looking for that. I was staring at the picture closely to see if I could find a part of it that would have been a dead giveaway for photoshopping and noticed that, indeed, that thing couldn't have been born if it's a member of any actual species.


EDIT: Legogod, what event are you referring to? I don't remember yelling at Rmctagg over this picture, especially because it's recent.

EDIT2: Are you referring to "GET OFF BGSF NAO, MCTAGGERT?" Because that was my CMOF, not actually yelling at him.
User avatar
Josh Dagreat
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:07 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:43 pm

Meh, I'm probably just being too hopeful. What gets me is the video from long ago that displays something very similar, but it can't be a shop because it's in video. True, it can still be hoaxed, but I know one thing..that isn't someone acting as a monster. It's too skinny and bony for that. Also, the reflection in the eyes from the IFR is strikingly realistic. Honestly, I have no idea what to make of any of it. Of course, I'm likely in the vast minority with this mindset. :shrug:

A possible, albeit unlikely, explanation, is that they found some guy with a severe physical disorder to play act for them in the woods without his clothes on. :laugh:
User avatar
lucy chadwick
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:43 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:34 am

Looks familiar there...
http://i54.tinypic.com/28vf0oo.jpg
User avatar
Daramis McGee
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:47 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:47 pm

Well, hey, will you look at that?

Mystery solved in under two pages, gang. I guess it's time to put the Mystery Mobile back in reverse and head home.
User avatar
Tiffany Holmes
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:28 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:53 am

Looks familiar there...
http://i54.tinypic.com/28vf0oo.jpg


Now I'm leaning towards the hoax side. I could say things like "Well, maybe the image was being circulated before now and that website just now found out about the story", but meh. Better to let it go than get disappointed.
User avatar
chloe hampson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:15 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:39 am

Looks familiar there...
http://i54.tinypic.com/28vf0oo.jpg

What's that from?
User avatar
Karine laverre
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:50 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:35 am

When I first saw the pic, I just thought, Quarantine. (American version of the movie REC.)
User avatar
Emily Martell
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:41 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:48 pm

When I first saw the pic, I just thought, Quarantine. (American version of the movie REC.)


Hah, Quaratine wishes it had images as good as that.
User avatar
Ray
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:17 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:48 am

come over here stalker; lets have a chat :)


Get out of here Stalker. Get out of here Stalker. Get ouf of her...

Okay. Enough. :P

I do wonder from which media the creature is from because it is indeed cool looking. :)
User avatar
Angela Woods
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:15 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 12:24 pm

That's not the least of its concerns. I see no possible methods of reproduction in that thing's anatomy.


...What? It's not like I was looking for that. I was staring at the picture closely to see if I could find a part of it that would have been a dead giveaway for photoshopping and noticed that, indeed, that thing couldn't have been born if it's a member of any actual species.


EDIT: Legogod, what event are you referring to? I don't remember yelling at Rmctagg over this picture, especially because it's recent.

EDIT2: Are you referring to "GET OFF BGSF NAO, MCTAGGERT?" Because that was my CMOF, not actually yelling at him.


I did notice that, but I didn't want to be the first to say it :disguise:
User avatar
luke trodden
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:48 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:04 am

Pretty obvious hoax in my mind (both the photo and the video). The photo is pretty easy. It's a blob of white. There's literally no extraneous detail. The rest of the picture has decent detail, and then there's asymmetrical blob man! Sticks out like a sore thumb.

As for the video, pretty clearly faked. Everything is too set up. Only a quick look at the face and barely any movement, and the same old tired 'Run away with crazy camera work!' that every hoax video has got to have.
User avatar
Louise Lowe
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:08 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:57 am

Hah, Quaratine wishes it had images as good as that.

If only this statement wasn't true. :laugh:
User avatar
{Richies Mommy}
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:40 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:12 am

Am I the only one that noticed its wearing pants?
User avatar
Bethany Short
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:47 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:18 am

Am I the only one that noticed its wearing pants?


Did some clearing up with Photoshop, sure looks like it:
http://i52.tinypic.com/t03ryh.jpg
User avatar
barbara belmonte
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:12 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:03 am

BGSF Sooby Doo gang, gogogo.
User avatar
gemma
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:10 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:56 am

That looks so ridiculously fake/photoshop against that background :rolleyes:

This. I've seen better "scary face" videos on YouTube. ^_^
User avatar
kasia
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:46 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:05 am

It's either the cryptozoological find of the year or a major hoax.
User avatar
IM NOT EASY
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:00 am

:blink:

User avatar
bonita mathews
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:04 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:30 am

*yawns*
User avatar
Katie Louise Ingram
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:10 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:02 am

BGSF Sooby Doo gang, gogogo.

you sir stole my idea v.v i was about to write " scooby doo got nothing on bgsf " xD

Damn you and your quick thinking !!!
User avatar
Bereket Fekadu
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:41 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:34 am

I think Gollum lost his precious again... we can lure him out of the forest with a ring!

Edit: and yes, it's clearly a fake.
User avatar
Veronica Martinez
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:43 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:04 am

Fake, my friend put this exact picture on his Face Book account and claimed he took the picture a month ago.
User avatar
Lakyn Ellery
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:02 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 12:42 pm

If they kill the thing it's only going to have 2 or 3 bottle caps as loot...
User avatar
des lynam
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:07 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:06 pm

If they kill the thing it's only going to have 2 or 3 bottle caps as loot...


That's still 2 or 3 more than you had before you shot it!

And you're right, it does look like a feral ghoul. That's why I always go into the woods with my German shepherd.
User avatar
Chloe Lou
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:08 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:02 am

That looks horribly fake.
User avatar
Alexxxxxx
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:55 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games