[Emma Pennington]

This is a thread where the users can give out reviews so that new comers to these forums, pondering whether or not they should buy this game, can read these reviews, and decide on their on whether or not they want to purchase the game. As some gaming websites, well, you can't always just trust one person.

All reviews should be spoiler free, and when giving a review, focus on EVERYTHING. Focus on the positives and the negatives, what new users should watch out for, but not to be alarmed in any way by. Don't just be like:
"NV svcks butt, cuz like there be tons of bugs and idoit npcs.And everything is too hard..."

Make your review entertaining.
Obviously, sense we are NV fans, new comers will very well be expecting high scores, and the occasional mad flamer.
Be truthful in your words, and give honest opinions.

Example for how they should be done:

[Insert Review Here]

Rating: 10/10.

I cannot write my review up just yet, but when it comes, I'll be sure to have it done nicely. (Only have had 5 hours into the game so far.)

[vanuza]

[quote name='DarkxWater24' date='19 October 2010 - 11:32 PM' timestamp='1287545530' post='16515396']
This is a thread where the users can give out reviews so that new comers to these forums, pondering whether or not they should buy this game, can read these reviews, and decide on their on whether or not they want to purchase the game. As some gaming websites, well, you can't always just trust one person.

How about three reviews from game sites that say the same thing?

"The game--a retail disc running on a new-model Xbox 360--crashed on me about a dozen times over the 33 hours I spent playing, often taking a significant amount of progress with it. The load times and frame rate seemed to get randomly worse as I continued to play the game, with some simple scene transitions taking 20 seconds or more. The technical hurdles you'll have to make to stay interested in New Vegas are meaner and more frustrating than any Deathclaw or Nightkin you'll face in the game. If you're the type of person who likes to watch for a patch or two before settling into a game, know this now: you probably don't want to play Fallout: New Vegas right away." -Giant Bomb


"How could I tell you whether or not it's an insult that you're being asked to pay $60 for a game that's so technically deficient that it scarcely feels past the beta stage? It's shocking that it's being released to the public in this state." - Joystiq


"I should also be clear – there are lots of pieces of Fallout: New Vegas that are broken." - RPGFan

[Michelle Smith]

IGN got it wrong again!!!!!!!!, how can you rate it an 8.5 that is disgusting :swear: :swear: :swear: :swear: :swear: :gun:

My thoughts on New Vegas so far I love the game its way better then fallout 3. More armor options is awesome my only complant about the game is the food I don't like the fact that you have to wait over a certain period of time for it to fill your health meter. That should have impemented for hardcoe mode only but hey its like throwing a pebble into an ocean its not really going to affect anything. I strongly recommend getting New Vegas its amazing and I have had no issues with bugs except getting stuck in the landscape once but I just loaded an earlier save from a couple minutes earlier. Since I have it for the 360 I haven't had any problems with Memory Cache. I do see it after 3 hours but its not an issue.

My personal rating 10/10
My non biased rating I'd give it an 9.7/10

[Joanne Crump]

I played the game on my PC for at least 6 hours without a single crash.

What the hell are these reviewers talking about?