today i was walking around a bookstore and decided to read a review on fallout new vegas just to see what it said cant remember the magazines name but pretty much it was this "fallout new vegas main quest is just poor nowhere near the level of fo3s main quest" and then it complains about there being no enclave and not enough bos game reviewers these days are idiots

The reviewers have Stockholme's Syndrome. They're used to cliches being shoved down their throats'. They've actually started to love the cliches and hate good writing. I've learned to live with it. Good plot=bad; generic (WESHOOTLAZERZATBADGUYZ!!!!LAWLZORZ!!!one!!!!eleven!!!)=good...

Game reviewers are people with opinions, too. :shrug:

Reviewers work like broken yo-yos. Sometimes they do get their [censored] together, but mostly they just do spirals while hanging down.

Sounds like most complaints I have seen "New Vegas is not FO3." Then there those that complain that "It is FO3 in Nevada." There are other Fallouts then FO3 to compare it to.

Styles, there are. But most people don't even know what they are. Old graphics and iso-metric turn-based combat is enough to keep 'modern gamers' away.