Sadly they went off on this Dlc, Imo, It is not that bad but should of added mor content. http://adf.ly/246203/banner/www.gamespot.com/xbox360/rpg/the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim-dawnguard/review.html?part=rss&tag=gs_reviews&subj=6385352&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

the only bad part is the bugs and they drop it to 7 lol

Game Reviews nowadays are picky. Take Prototype 2 for example. Gregg Miller counted "Draw Distance" as a negative. That's sad.

gregg miller needs to choke on a corndog.

I don't trust any reveiws from gamestop, machinma, or gameinformer ( yes I know gameinformer and gamestop or almost the same)

Great, more people dislike certain review sites because they gave Dawnguard a 'lower' score. Instead of judging the review by what score it gave why not point out their shortcomings as a review itself? Granted, I really dislike metric scores in general.

EDIT: I have to agree with the fact that the negative points were kind of intentional rather than objective, like he wanted to look for faults

It's opinion, it is usually only 1 person reviewing it so it's going to differ alot. If you don't enjoy the crossbows, or any of the forms your not going to look forward to much. I take reviews lightly.

Meh, I don't trust game reviews anymore.... unless it's a zero punctuation one anyway...

I love vampires and the game did my vampire good so I think it was worth it. Meeting the knight-paladin was awesome too

I can't remeber who but somebody reviwed Ghost Recon Future Soilder ( Great game just lacks in lasting apeal) and said it was HUD overhual. I could see if you had bad eyesight but everything is simply there.

i think thats a pretty fair rating. The DLC adds a new way to play the game in becoming a VL, but lacks with the story. Not to mention the Soul Cairn which is a giant land of nothing.