Yeah, I'm reposting. Suuuue me. 
It's kind of disheartening reading some of the comments on articles about LulzSec, people don't seem to realise that the cybercrime you need to worry about isn't people hacking a website and posting ASCII pencses, but rather the hundreds upon hundreds of credit card defrauding, phishing scamming, identity thieving nameless groups who don't publicise their activities.
Those who take the time to read their pastebins are prolly those already interested in the issues of security, I suspect ; the vast majority simply won't take that time. And so, people's anger gets diverted in the wrong place. Once they get caught, everybody's going to shout "hurray" and go back to sleep, cause what, there's nothing left to fear amirite ?
Just saying : you are of course correct, but I suspect that problem is inherent to their modus operandi. If they're serious in their most serious claims, they're a diversion at best, and at worst, they'll end up 'proving' the exact contrary (naughty hackers get caught, y'all safe).
I don't agree with LulzSec at all, but I'm more angry with the multitude of companies who store our information yet invest little in information security.
I mean, take only banks : apparently, the nature of your purchases is written plain and clear, and stored a helluva long time. Just even that is scary, in a holy-big-brother kind of way. Add to that very creepy security measures (was not kidding about that bank that requests a 6-no-more-no-less-numbers-only password to access an online account).
As it is, I suspect extra security will (has ?) become a marketable good. What, invest our benefits in protecting your stuff ? Mhhh, pay extra. 'k you.
I don't know. I'm not really buying the whole anarchist enterprise thing. The tweets from friday gave the distinct impression they were bored : they're just upping their game to keep the show going. Besides, I don't think even they are buying what they're saying : I mean, they screw sony, but what's the net result ? Sony's well, but thousand of personal infos get leaked, and they're urging for defacing those "peons", and not hiding their delight in it either. Whatever they're doing, it's going to bounce back on us, and they know it. *Shrug* 'entertainment at your expense', indeed.
***
*edit* In other news, http://lulzsecexposed.blogspot.com/2011_06_01_archive.html(?). Hmm. They're not posting full info : I do hope it means they wised up about the inadvisability of public doxing, rather than actual lack of info. If the former, kudos, better late than never : after all, apparently the previous info on Kayla was false. So throwing wrong people to the public wrath *is*, if nothing else, an actual problem.