Metacritic backlash from ps3

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:55 pm

Is it Bethesda's fault that the PS3 doesn't provide the developer tools that Microsoft does? PS3 may have lagged a little behind the Xbox at the beginning in sales, but the PS3 is NOT a console Bethesda would intentionally negelct.

EDIT: Maybe the backlash should be directed at Sony.

Yet again someone who doesn't get the point. I agree with you that a lot of the hate directed toward Bethesda due to the PS3 issues is unecessary. If sony, as you suggest, didn't give them the tools to work with, they shouldn't have released the game on that platform. It's still their respinsibility, not sony's.
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:58 pm

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:50 am

Sad that the Metacritic scores are so low due to technical problems on the PS3, meanwhile I have it on PC and so far I've encountered practically no bugs.
User avatar
JR Cash
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:59 pm

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:46 am

Sad that the Metacritic scores are so low due to technical problems on the PS3, meanwhile I have it on PC and so far I've encountered practically no bugs.

Same here on the PS3. Well, there was one in the quest progression in the Companions Guild but that is on all platforms.
User avatar
i grind hard
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:58 am

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:46 pm

Same here on the PS3. Well, there was one in the quest progression in the Companions Guild but that is on all platforms.

I second that.

I'm about 90% sure all PS3 users complaints stem from not creating a new character post 1.2. There are issues with pre 1.2 characters to sure, but nothing a restart won't fix.

The issue is also compounded by players killing people at random and expecting them not to be tied to something, in some way.

i.e

PS3 QUESTS are even broken.

Sorry people are having problems, but Bethesda & Sony gave you the fix. Your problem if you don't want to make a new character a WEEK after the game launched. Thats when 1.2 launched right? The save file stop-gap?

Thanks.
User avatar
:)Colleenn
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:03 am

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:47 pm



I second that.

I'm about 90% sure all PS3 users complaints stem from not creating a new character post 1.2. There are issues with pre 1.2 characters to sure, but nothing a restart won't fix.

The issue is also compounded by players killing people at random and expecting them not to be tied to something, in some way.

i.e

PS3 QUESTS are even broken.

Sorry people are having problems, but Bethesda & Sony gave you the fix. Your problem if you don't want to make a new character a WEEK after the game launched. Thats when 1.2 launched right? The save file stop-gap?

Thanks.

My 1.1 character works fine. I just deleted the game data before 1.3.
User avatar
Ronald
 
Posts: 3319
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:28 am

As far as I'm concerned, professional game reviews carry no weight. It's quite a simple relationship between game companies and professional reviewers - give us a good review or you will never get another review copy of any of our future games. Hence the number of game reviews that are heavily weighted towards the 90s and 100s.

I look at Metacritic to see what the real reviewers - the ones that pay good money and play the game - have to say.
User avatar
Brooks Hardison
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:14 am

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:20 am

Lol@Metacritic, seriously. Biggest joke of a critic site on this planet.

User avatar
~Amy~
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:38 am

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:44 am

Metacritic could really do to divide their scores over different consoles... a good game could suffer from a bad port, and while here that's not quite true (Bethesda put Skyrim on all 3 consoles) it'd be really unfair if one console got its game ported over by a different dev and the score for the whole game was brought down.

Umm, they already do, and not quite true doesn't cut it, the objection you make is based on something that simply isn't true anyway. Even if they were joined and you're objection was one of the version being weaker which brought down it's overall score it's still relevant as people checking it for an opinion including what to buy for can be made aware of it.

Metacritic scores you need to take with a grain of salt since sometimes you will get the 0 scores or whatever for having DRM or some other issue that is not related to the quality of the game though it may effect your purchase. The actual player reviews are worthwhile though. You can read of an issue and think that wont bother me, or I hate when games do that, or read about something someone liked and think to yourself awesome or god that is lame how could anyone like that etc. Once you get to the why's of the scores you get pretty good information even if the person exaggerated the score by giving it a 10 or a 1. That is of course assuming you have had life experiences and learned form then so you have a grasp of your own likes and dislikes. From what I could tell from this forum before launch that is a unusual trait, most people have never experienced anything and need to experience the kick in the balls to know it will hurt.
Heres the funny thing DRM is something thats tied deeply to the game, it's part of how you purchase it and built into the game, you can't say just cause a company takes a lousy way to include it does not make it irrelevant to the game and whether you may or may not purchase it. Sure it's not a gameplay feature nor is it glitched graphics and quests but if I checked out a series of reviews and none even mentioned let alone marked down the game for only being installable on one PC or shutting itself off if your connection drops I'd be pretty annoyed.

Lol@Metacritic, seriously. Biggest joke of a critic site on this planet.

Yeah having all the reviews listed with scores in one place and given an overall score is so much worse then reading OPSM US and being told the game is perfect with a score of 100 or numberous other sites that show a heavy bias.
User avatar
James Potter
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:40 am

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:27 am

Trust me after a while restarting the PS3 no longer works, it only works when your save file is around 7MB, but the game just plain becomes unplayable after awhile, and no Patch 1.2 did not fix it, it just delayed the lag for a few more hours, but at the cost of the game crashing very frequently.
Broken quest? I have yet to see a broken quest when I played unpatched, but of course once I started adding the patches the quest became broken.

Funny thing, the only Beth game that did not have this save file bloating was Oblivion, yet Oblivion was ported over by another company, *sigh* 300 hours in a save file on Oblivion and my save file is under 5mb....
User avatar
Cathrine Jack
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:29 am

Post » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:58 am

Anything is relevant until it says anything negative about Skyrim, then it becomes anathema on these forums.

That is a pretty petulant and untrue post. I expect better of you. We have forum rules on this forum. The language and behavior of posts and threads that get moderated are in violation of the forum rules. People would love to believe that we have an agenda, that we are all OMG, censorship, because they want to circumvent the behavior we expect of them. Civility, no personal attacks, no profanity, no flaming. There are a boatload of very negative threads, many of which you have particpated in, if my memory serves.

I am reviewing this thread. While, hopefully still able to have my drink with my friends here. :rolleyes:
User avatar
Kitana Lucas
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:24 pm

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim