Why you shouldn't listen to game reviewers...

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 2:14 am

Sorry a LARGE expansion... should have been on the shelf for $19.99...
User avatar
liz barnes
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:10 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:07 am

Sorry a LARGE expansion... should have been on the shelf for $19.99...

Fallout NV is bigger, better, and more Bad Ass than FO3, and I loved me some FO3.
User avatar
Victoria Bartel
 
Posts: 3325
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:20 am

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:30 pm

Bugs are an important aspect when reviewing a game. It can look nice, but if you can't play it, then it's crap.

As consumers, we should not be tolerant of game-breaking bugs, nor even large bugs. It's like buying a new car, only to have the AC not work, the stereo broken, and the tail-lights smashed. Sure, it drives, but it isn't what you paid for.

I play mostly PS2 and PC games, and of the dozen PS2 games I've played, I can think of only one that had a game-breaking bug, and none that had anything I could readily spot as a bug or problem. When you can't patch the final product, there's no forgiveness for tons of bugs (or even just a few outstanding bugs); if your game doesn't work at the day it's released, it never will, and your sales will stop once everyone becomes aware that the game is broken.
User avatar
Ells
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:03 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:54 pm

I dont care for graphics, I want the game to be good and I'm happy. I was immersing myself on Rayman for the PS1 yesterday (Nostalgia FTW) and I didnt once bother about the graphics. If I want something to look like real life I'll go outside :D
User avatar
Leticia Hernandez
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:46 am

Previous

Return to Fallout: New Vegas

cron